I agree it is quite likely that the exposure of his guilt is a result of selective investigation and enforcement policies implemented by a suborned DOJ. Proving that will be difficult without further information/evidence. In this context, I think we should focus our attention on the Siegelman (sp?) case in Alabama, where it appears much more likely that an innocent man has been prosecuted to achieve political ends.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
