You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: I heard some DC bureauocrat say last week that 60% of the economy was consumer consumption [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I heard some DC bureauocrat say last week that 60% of the economy was consumer consumption
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 11:45 AM by HereSince1628
What the guy seemed not to understand was that consumers are generally people who are employed and thereby have money to spend.

I am quite surprised that the powers that be don't understand why retail is tanking. Virtually every family in the country suffered this summer due to the gouging of oil/gasoline prices. Many burdened credit cards and depleted savings accounts to make it through the summer. On top of this, in our country where about 15% of people (about 1 in 6) are either out of work or under-employed virtually every worker has either a close friend or a family member who is suffering from lack of gainful employment.

This quite justifiably makes people resistant to spending on anything but essentials. Getting money into the hands of consumers will certainly help fix our problems. We either get money into people's hands by putting people to work or we create a huge population on welfare. Which of those alternatives is the most attractive?

It seems obvious to me that we need to reconstruct our national economy so that manufacturing is part of it. The 20 year experiment with a retail-based economy now reveals it doesn't provide the means to get people back to work. Government spending on infrastructure isn't going to do any good for our nation if we hire foreign companies to do the work with imported materials. Although technologically in a better place, we are back in the same place where we were in 1789, which is desperately needing to develop an economy. Doing that will require the same sorts of things that the writers of the Constitution built into the Constitution for that purpose--the application of import taxes, tariffs and trade restrictions. That doesn't mean trade shouldn't be encouraged.

However, the promotion of freemarketering has been a Letter of Mark that has pilfered our treasuries and pirated our industries. Our developed nation has moved to a much reduced and hugely indebted status. A status that now hasn't the means of production need to meaningfully employ Keynesian solutions to this deepening recession. A significantly enhanced manufacturing base must be added to the economy and protected as a strategic necessity for long term national survival.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC