You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alaska Governor Introduces New Alcohol Bill [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 04:15 PM
Original message
Alaska Governor Introduces New Alcohol Bill
Advertisements [?]
House Bill 91 / Senate Bill 85: ALCOHOL: LOCAL OPTION / LICENSING / MINORS

The Governor’s office introduced bills in both houses to limit alcohol distribution to damp communities. The bill would reduce the current allowed amount of distilled liquor by 75% and the current amount of wine and beer by 50%. Additionally, there are provisions in the bill which increase the penalties for selling alcohol to a minor, for bootlegging, and for consuming alcohol as a minor.

I think there are multiple problems with this bill. Such a drastic reduction in the amount of alcohol allowed into a damp community may convince communities to change from “damp” to “wet” (“wet” is the same as “unrestricted”. “Unrestricted” can mean several things: the community decides to have importation limits above “damp” levels; to have liquor sales in restaurants, to have liquor stores, or to have package stores. The community can choose which if any of these options it wants to enact).

The impact of no limits on amounts of alcohol probably would be worse. It may also actually increase the criminal activity of bootlegging, with the “street value” of imported alcohol rising exponentially.

I believe the Governor’s office has good intentions. But there are many tools that public policy makers have to fight the problems that bootlegging and underage drinking present, and we need to use all of them – not just one or two, as this bill does. I also think that the Governor would have benefited by listening to the people on the ground – the people in our communities who know and fully understand this problem.

The House version of this bill is in the Community and Regional Affairs Committee which I co-Chair. Its current status is “under review pending pro & con input from western Alaska”.

http://www.deltadiscovery.com/insidebethelnews/insidebethelnews.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC