Freepers outraged that marriage has been tossed "Under the Bus" in Iowa

[marmar]

:rofl: :nopity:




from the FreeRepublic thread "Iowa Supreme Court Throws Marriage Under the Bus":



To: Drew McKissick
Impeach the tyrant judges.



2 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 12:58:15 PM by Regulator (Welcome to Zimbabwe! Now hand over your property)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Drew McKissick
Iowa of all places.



3 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 12:58:32 PM by Slapshot68
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Regulator
Impeach the tyrant judges.

And that's what really bothers me about this. If it was done legislatively, I'd be much more OK with it. Even if God is against it - well, this isn't a theocracy, and I like our government erring on the side of liberty. Let the Church speak the truth on the issue. But despotic judges - they definitely are not good for liberty.

4 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:00:48 PM by kc8ukw
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Drew McKissick
Attention all queers living in my hometown: Go to Iowa.
That is all.


5 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:01:09 PM by clintonh8r (Librerals are more dangerous to liberty than terrorists.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Drew McKissick
they said that the law is unconstitutional

????????????????????????????????????????/

so does this mean now homo’s can get married right away or can an appeal go in and why are people not demonstrating up there about this and why not get the constitution changed like we have down here in FL

for any homo’s thinking they are married, YOU ARE NOT
I am not religious either so cut the crap about me being a religious person.

You are sick and have a perverted sick mind which needs to be addressed



6 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:02:08 PM by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick MA,CT sham marriage end racism end affirmative action)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Drew McKissick
Yep. 1000 years from now, historians will discuss the Decline and Fall of America. I believe they will look back to Marbury v. Madison as when the courts began to steer the whole thing into the ground.



7 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:03:24 PM by NeoConfederate
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Drew McKissick
When are we, as a nation, going to stand up and say ENOUGH?

Judges have NO right to overturn the voter’s decisions.



8 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:09:38 PM by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Drew McKissick
I ask you all to consider why gays agitate for the “right” to marry....

Hint: It’s the financial benefits of marriage that are conferred by the state when they license the union.

If you really want to end this agitation for gay marriage, you have to remove the invidious discrimination against gays in things like taxation and socialist insecurity benefits.

It’s that simple.



9 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:11:55 PM by DivaDelMar (CRAm member-- (Conservative Republicans Against mcCain) Think you're entitled to my vote? CRAm It!!!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: DivaDelMar
They agitate for the their right to “marry” because they want to destroy the traditional family and all that it represents.

They don’t want any healthy normal behavior going on. It bothers them.



10 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:13:35 PM by Marie2 (The capacity for self-government is a moral quality. Only a moral people can be free.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Marie2
Have you ever talked to a gay person?

They could care less what goes on in your bedroom.

They want the right to devise their property to their significant other, free of taxation.

I just did an inheritance tax return for a woman who was living in a “non-traditional” relationship. Because she had the audacity to die while not “married” in the eyes of the state, the state confiscated $150k and allowed her to convey the remainder to her significant other.

If they had been married in the eyes of the state, the tax burden would have been ZERO.

Tell me again what is driving this push for gay “marriage.”



11 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:16:07 PM by DivaDelMar (CRAm member-- (Conservative Republicans Against mcCain) Think you're entitled to my vote? CRAm It!!!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Drew McKissick
Kawlefornea is next.
We don't need no stinkin' amendments... we will overrule them because we are untouchable and we know what's best for you whether you like it or not.

Well, I don't like it. I'm sick of it. And I'm not going to take it anymore. IMPEACH, IMPEACH, IMPEACH.


12 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:17:49 PM by BigFinn (Isaiah 32:8 But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Slapshot68
Iowa of all places.
The people of Iowa are as opposed to gay marriage by huge margins. That makes this decision even more tyrannical. It's the judges in question lost their jobs and the Democratic party in that state paid the price.


13 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:24:21 PM by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: DivaDelMar
Have I ever talked to a gay person?

I work for gay people.

I live in SF.

I have had violent protestors at my church several times over the past 20 years. I have had agitators in the church.

I know ALL ABOUT the WHOLE AGENDA.



14 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:24:53 PM by Marie2 (The capacity for self-government is a moral quality. Only a moral people can be free.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: DivaDelMar
Me thinks you are at the wrong website. Take your gaymarriage-loving views and preach them to the subhumans over at DU. You might get some respect from them.



15 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:26:55 PM by ohioman
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Drew McKissick
This idiocy also creates an open path for people to marry their children, their siblings, their dogs or other livestock, or as many “partners” as they want.

To anybody who disagrees, I say “Why not ?”



16 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:31:12 PM by jimt
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Drew McKissick
The cancer has spread to the point where seccession may be a prescient topic for today. The malevalent judges are EVERYWHERE! So just voting a couple of politicians isn’t going to fix the ubuquitous rot of our schools and culture. We got problems, baby! As for myself, I think I’m going to just mellow out a little.



17 posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 1:32:40 PM by Professor_Leonide (I said to the young man who showed me a photo, "Who can ever be sure what is behind a mask?")
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: DivaDelMar
They want the right to devise their property to their significant other, free of taxation.
I don't see a problem with that - that's just. Let's get rid of ALL inheritance taxes.

Also, no hospital should be allowed to keep a "significant other" from a sizk person.

There are many changes that I'd agree wholeheartedly to.

Redefining marriage is NOT one of them.



More, sadly, at: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2221629/posts