Reply #15: You and your outrage.

[babylonsister]

You posted a link, I posted three to dispute yours, and you never even addressed them. All I'm saying is your opinion doesn't necessarily make it so. But you have a hard-on for Gates and have for awhile, so anything he does, you're not going to like. I'm trying to see both sides. And I hate that we're in Afghanistan with no end in sight, just as you do. But I'm not the boss, nor do I have inside knowledge of what their reasoning is other than the broad outline we've heard.

And you're right, I know you're not hoping for failure, so that I take back, and I do acknowledge your positive posts when I see them. EDIT TO ADD: I didn't think you were hoping for failure, so you put words in my mouth. :spank:

Edit to add from Matt Yglesias:

http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/04/praise_for_the_new_defense_budget.php

Praise for the New Defense Budget

For more analysis on yesterday’s defense budget analysis see Robert Farley, Spencer Ackerman, Fred Kaplan, and James Fallows. All are impressed, and all rightly so.

This is the move that justifies the decision to keep Robert Gates on at the Pentagon. Any new Defense Secretary, no matter how brilliant, would have had to have spent his first three months in office building relationships with the top military commanders and focusing on filling out the DOD civilian staff. Only a Secretary who’s already been in office could have the ability to propose sweeping change. But only a president who’s brand new could have the popularity and honeymoon effect necessary to have any hope of driving the changes through congress. Hence the appeal of the odd alignment of new president and old defense secretary.