You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: the notion that high taxes keep the rich from participating in the economy is an overplayed canard [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. the notion that high taxes keep the rich from participating in the economy is an overplayed canard
it works for the right to use it because there's an element of truth to it. rich people do consider taxes when deciding what to do. but for the most part, it influences HOW they participate in the economy, not IF they participate in the economy.

high tax marginal rates might lead them to steer more of their money to tax protected instruments like munis, but is this really such a terrible thing?

the only real risk is that they might move out of the country entirely, but this is not likely to be significant for quite a number of reasons, not the least of it is that america remains the best place for the rich to protect and expand their wealth.


moreover, quibbling about something like 33% vs. 39% is ludicrous. NO ONE decides against starting a business because the tax rate is 39%, where they really would have done it had the tax rate been 33%. if we're talking about jacking up tax rates above 70%, then the right might have a point, but no one's talking about that.

and even when we DID have marginal tax rates that high, we had a ton of loopholes that amounted to the government directing the economy via the tax code. they made sure there were way -- productive way -- for the rich to shelter their money by doing something desireable. for the most part, anyway. eventually the rich lobbied for more and more crazy, non-productive loopholes that it became silly, thus building their argument for doing away with it entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC