You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: I would feel more comfortable that it was just Bush if they would close Bagram. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would feel more comfortable that it was just Bush if they would close Bagram.
I believe the prisoners were transferred to Bagram from Guantanamo by the Bush Administration (when the court decided that Guantanamo prisoners should in fact have habeas corpus rights). The ACLU filed a FOIA request yesterday to try to get information regarding what is going on at Bagram. Here is just a snippet of that request (link to pdf of the FOIA request: http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/safefree/bagramfoia.pdf):

"This Request seeks records pertaining to the detention and treatment of prisoners held at the Bagram Theater Internment Facility at
Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan ("Bagram"), including records concerning the process afforded these prisoners to challenge their detention and designation as "enemy combatants.

<snip>

Recent news reports suggest that the U.S. government is detaining more than 600 individuals at Bagram.

<snip>

Bagram prisoners reportedly receive an even less robust and meaningful process for challenging their detention and designation as
"enemy combatants" than the process afforded prisoners at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay ("Guantanamo") - a process the U.S. Supreme Court declared unconstitutional last year... Moreover, there is public concern that the U.S. government is holding many prisoners at Bagram, rather than at Guantanamo, specifically to avoid any judicial review of their detentions in U.S. courts."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC