Reply #42: Personal attacks are no substitute for answering factual questions yes or no....

[Blackhatjack]

Who needs credentials when they post easily verifiable factual statements with a Link? (Do I need to provide you with my professional credentials to make reference to the Periodic Table?).

Once again you spent precious electrons pontificating on 'credentials' and 'profiles' as if they will provide anyone with 'proof' of any of the statements I made in my OP.

As far as casting dispersions on my credibility because I have not provided you with a profile from which you can peer into the smoke and fathom the degree of credibility I deserve, I might make the counter argument with your feigned credibility because you posted a profile.

Epidemiologists deal with facts, and draw inferences from those facts, in the performance of their duties. Since you avoid facts, I have my doubts as to your allegations that you are an epidemiologist.

I guess you must be some kind of special epidemiologist since you use terms like 'booga booga.' Do you refute arguments in the course of your work by making up terms to describe them?

So you have not answered any of my questions, and have not pointed out even one statement in the OP which is untrue. I guess that is all anyone needs to know about who is 'telling the truth' in this exchange.