You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: From MN DUer Mr Ed (it's nice to hear from DUers who live in MN about this): [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. From MN DUer Mr Ed (it's nice to hear from DUers who live in MN about this):
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3847287&mesg_id=3848227

Mister Ed Donating Member (859 posts) Fri Apr-24-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. MN DUer here

I've been following this closely since November 5th. I can't claim that makes me someone who knows what's going on, but I'll give you my take on it.

I think the reason the MN Supreme Court allowed Coleman such a long time to prepare for the hearing is simply that he asked them to. I think they would have done the same for Franken if he had asked. Why? Because this is such an important matter, and they want to make sure no one has cause for complaint - at least not legal complaint. The three-judge panel allowed Coleman five weeks to try to make his case. They never once asked him to hurry it up, because they wanted to make sure he couldn't claim on appeal that he had not been given due process. I think the MN Supreme Court is thinking along those same lines.

What you say is true. The MN Supreme Court is widely viewed as being fair, judicious, and nonpartisan. I anticipate that they will rule in favor of Franken, because Coleman simply doesn't have a case. I also predict that they will do Governor Pawlenty a big favor and order him to issue an election certificate. That would get him off the hook with the GOP ("Hey, my hands are tied!").

It's become crystal clear to me that Coleman is doing all he legally can do to delay the inevitable seating of the winner of this close election. The fact that the courts have accommodated him does not mean they're complicit. He's operating within his legal rights, and the courts are upholding the law.


Had the courts moved as fairly and deliberately in Bush v. Gore in the 2000 election as the MN courts have done in this election, then Al Gore would have been the president. If Florida's election system was as good as that of MN, then Gore clearly would have been declared the winner there. This will be done in June when the MN Supreme court declares Franken to be the winner and orders that he be certified the winner. Pawlenty will have political cover and have no choice but to certify him and Al Franken will go to Washington.

I am certain that most voters in MN want Franken to be seated as we do. It's their system, their state and if they can endure this to its conclusion we should be able to endure also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC