You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #151: More than one possible cause of the atypical pattern of deaths [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Jim Pivonka Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #99
151. More than one possible cause of the atypical pattern of deaths
The cause of deaths as reported in the media has included flooding of the lungs with fluids, and related symptoms.

Some reports have indicated, correctly, that these can be associated with strong immune system reactions. Though I am not familiar with and will have to research the "cytokine" response, I do know that immunlological reactions resulting in inflammation can "runaway" and cause tissue breakdown etc. So that would be one possible explanation. It would be consistent with a reduction in the degreee to which healthy immune response in young adults is protective against severe disease - in a few case the response goes too far and itself causes severe illness and death.

But in dealing with flu there is at least one additional possible reason. Some flu, notably the 1918 flu, is capable of causing severe inflammation of and tissue breakdown in the broncial and alveolar epithelium. This leads in some cases to a proteolytic cascade, a breakdown of epithelial cells and of the intracellular scaffoldingl, which is extremely serious - life threatening and hard to treat.

The second is the probable cause of the high death rate among young adults during the 1918 flu based on some characteristics of the virus. The first may have been significant too. I am not sure there is agreement about which is most important, or even if there is much evidence (other than the character of the virus) for either compared to the other.

I have not seen indications that this second possible cause has been excluded as the cause of death in the fatal cases.

The pattern of distribution of the fatal cases in time and geography is also of concern. The apparent distribution raises serious questions about the nature of the virus itself - is it changing rapidly? why? What characteristics (parts of its genetic complement) are changing?

Or is the apparent pattern only an illusion resulting from faulty and incomplete data? Too early to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC