You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #114: The OP may be fine [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #31
114. The OP may be fine
in general, I think it is a terrible idea to borrow 100%. And I disagree as to the cause of the current issues.

The change in lending standards which made 100% loans the norm, completely changed the way people bought homes. There suddenly was no impediment for young first time buyers to start in their real estate market by buying their "dream house". For decades before the deregulation and lowering of mortgage standards first time buyers particularly were forced into purchasing smaller homes in older neighborhoods, often investing in improvements, building equity for a period of time, then selling their "starter home" cashing in their equity to make the larger down payment for the nicer property. This period also served to solidify the younger buyers financial status and their job time making catastrophic loss of income less likely. This system kept the housing market in check, toward the end of the housing bubble new homes were selling at an unprecedented rate against existing property.

There used to be a show on HGTV which each episode followed the purchase of a first home by a young person or couple. It demonstrated this week after week and I knew that we were headed for trouble (it didn't take a Pulitzer economist to see). Every week a new young buyer(s) would tell of their entry level job as they were driving their new car(s) around looking at $200k to $500k real estate. It would come time for the closing and the host would explain that the buyer had no down payment and was hoping to finance enough additional to buy all new stainless appliances, living room furniture and maybe a new entertainment center. Then off to the closing they would go in their new cars, finance 80% for 40 years with a 5 year interest only deferment, and 20% which was actually 25% to enable the purchase of all of the new amenities desired. The payment totaled 50% of their gross when you looked at PITI payments. There has never been another time in history that I am aware of that lending practices have been so lax for such a long period. This is the basis of our current housing/mortgage problem IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC