You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #62: Agreed it is not the same, It is slow, archaic, and hit-and-miss. Why do it the [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Strong Atheist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #32
62. Agreed it is not the same, It is slow, archaic, and hit-and-miss. Why do it the
slow/hard/hit-and-miss way when there are faster, and easier ways that tend to get controlled results?

Not disingenuous or pretending; genetic manipulation is genetic manipulation; it is just that now we have better ways of doing it than we did in the previous 12,000 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC