26. They can force one senator to deny unanimous consent requests. If you want to call that a filibuster
then fine.
My question to you is: do you still falsely maintain that there is any way under the Senate rules to force a single Republican to TALK for an indefinite period of time (or any period of time)? I don't mean saying "I sense the absence of a quorum," or "I object to the unanimous consent request" every hour. I mean actually talk.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
