You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Theory: Liberals use deductive thinking, Conservatives rely on inductive reasoning. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:04 AM
Original message
Theory: Liberals use deductive thinking, Conservatives rely on inductive reasoning.
Advertisements [?]
Think of Sherlock Holmes. He gathered clues and then reached a conclusion. That's deductive reasoning.

But coming up with a theory and then looking for clues to support that theory is also valid in detective work. That's called inductive reasoning.

Now, Liberals, with their critical thinking skills, are deductive reasoners. They look at the facts and then, reach a conclusion. If the facts change, their conclusions change. It's all based on the facts.

Conservatives, who are more ideologues, are more inductive. Perfect example was the study of the Bell Curve where someone came up with a theory and used existing data to put together like a montage puzzle to prove that I.Q. was based on race. The key problems with the study, was that the researchers were biased, and the data they used was weak and refutable.

By the way, the Bell Curve, in case anyone forgets, was an early effort from the Right to use bad science to eliminate public money for social programs like head start which benefited poor black areas.

This is key to understanding the conservative mind. They are influenced by their ideologies and prejudices. They reach conclusions, and then pull in all the studies and information that supports that conclusion. Then they go on a full offensive strategy to (1) spread the meme so that people in their political camp can echo their soundbites and (2) flat out attack any data that challenges their conclusion. That includes rewriting reports and discrediting anyone who questions them.

And then, to further show the destructive nature of the inductive method as used by the conservatives, when liberals change their conclusions to fit new data as it comes up, the conservatives call them weak. This is why they saw Bush as a strong leader. Because Bush stuck to the same premise and never varied in his eight years of office. People who questioned his facts were attacked. Their patriotism was also questioned.

So the more we can take the time to dismantle their poor reasoning methods, the more a pattern will emerge. And once we have the evidence, we need to put it out there so that even their own people can see how their thought process is being hijacked by an ideologically driven reasoning method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC