|
Should this be the standard for how we deal with all the terrorists? For example, since they (the terrorists) are not going by the normal rules of warfare, they don't deserve the standards of trials?
I think it would be a dangerous road to go on myself, but when I see so many saying they are happy with the way things happened and don't see any issues of legality then I wonder if this is the new standard which is accepted for justice for terrorist.
Or was OBL such a notable exception, so it was kind of a one time deal you are ok with it, but that you would not be willing to have this applied as a wide standard when pursuing other terrorists?
|