You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: Sad... Sometimes necessary but IMO should rarely be the outcome [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sad... Sometimes necessary but IMO should rarely be the outcome
Then again, I think wildlife impact statements should be the requirement for new development into previously forested or wilderness areas, just as environmental impact statements are required for commercial development. I know every RWer, Libertarian and a fair share of liberal/progressives will ridicule me for that, but I sincerely believe we have that responsbility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC