You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #87: note the characterization here [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
87. note the characterization here
Edited on Wed May-11-11 05:34 PM by HankyDubs
"the far left" --> referring to the majority of Du'ers as if they were extremists. Marginalize and insult, good job!

The first argument put forward for days by the far Left was that bin Laden was a foggy old man who was assassinated. Now the argument is that bin Laden was the man all along, now that he is dead, why is the US staying in Afghanistan.

I don't think there's any inconsistency here. The "far left" (the majority of the US public wants to leave afghanistan, btw...far left?). The first part of your statement is straw man, never heard anyone describe him as a foggy old man. But even if we accept your characterization, the death of Bin Laden is a great excuse to GTFO of Afghanistan. That's why we invaded the country, remember? He's dead, mission accomplished time to go!

The United States would not have taken out bin Laden if it was not in Afghanistan.

How do you figure? We wouldn't have killed OBL if we weren't in an entirely different country?

The United States will not get to the number 2 man in al qaeda without operating bases in Afghanistan.

Oh so now the goalposts move. Then if we "get" the #2 man, then we need to "get" the #3 and then #4 and then on and on. Endless war, trillions wasted to "get" a few individuals?

There is absolute no certainty that if the United States leaves Afghanistan now that it won't have to invade that nuclear armed nation a few years down the line to eliminate another incubator for terrorism.

Again, afghanistan and pakistan are two different countries, it seems like you don't understand this. There is no absolute certainty that we need to invade Pakistan either, seems like wasting trillions on "no absolute certainty" is quite foolish. I'll say what other have already said here...Pakistan has nuclear weapons! Invading countries with nuclear weapons is no joke. If we ever did "need" to invade pakistan we would find a ready ally in India, but again we are talking about the beginning of WWIII here.

I trust President Obama more than I trust the far Left..

60% of the american people want to get out of afghanistan. http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2011-05-10-Afghanistan-mission-bin-Laden-troops-poll_n.htm?csp=34news Is that the far left? Marginalizing DU'ers again, btw.

The the day of fighting machines is in the distant future, until machines can take the place of skilled soldiers, the United States will need soldiers in outposts like Afghanistan.

Oh great, rise of the machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC