You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Physician incomes SEEM [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Physician incomes SEEM
Edited on Thu May-12-11 02:05 PM by Carolina
large but if you factor in the cost and years of a medical education (i.e. physician indebtedness) and malpractice insurance, you get some perspective.

Medical education --tuition alone for 4 years-- costs anywhere from a low of ~80,000 to high of >$200,000. This does not include books, housing, equipment, etc nor does it take into account any indebtedness from college! So in the end, most doctors complete their education with loan debt equivalent to the mortgage debt for a McMansion!

Then there is malpractice insurance which can easily run into $100,000+ and which is what drives defensive medicine. No doctor will ever make millions of dollars from one case while lawyers do everyday (and they bill for phone calls, emails, whatever -- billable hours)!

Specialists train for years (neurosurgeons 6 years after med school, cardiothoracic surgeons 6 years, general surgeons 5 years after med school, OB-GYNs 4 years after med school, etc.). No doctor controls all the factors encountered in cases/situations but in the legal world, a doctor is held accountable for the outcome and does not get a jury of his/her peers. Moreover, doctors frequently have to juggle diagnostic verbiage so that you can get the care you need (including specialist referrals) covered by insurance and they can get some reimbursement. To see what I'm talking about take a look at those confounded "explanation of benefits" statements you get after office visits, procedures, etc.

The doctors are not the ones profiting from this system nor are they the ones driving it. Insurance companies call the shots.

I will concede that there are greedy bastards everywhere, including medicine, but I work in an acdemic setting and I am awed by:
- the expertise and ethics of many of my colleagues who do good and well but don't bilk the system
- the idealistic medical students who study hard, for long hours, for years and who walk the talk of service in medical school and beyond

Carolina MD

Edited to add: I hate the AMA and never joined. It opposed Medicare and Medicaid, it supported Phil Gramm for POTUS in 1996 :puke: and it's reactive (rather than proactive for good), reactionary and frequently behind the times & on the wrong side!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC