Previous stuff on race:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/nov/05/highereducation.researchOn why 'modern feminism is evil'
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200908/why-modern-feminism-is-illogical-unnecessary-and-evilOn war, hate, nukes and why Ann Coulter should be president:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200803/why-we-are-losing-warHis writings are not only nasty but pseudoscientific. He constantly confuses correlation with causation, and, despite paying occasional lip-service to denouncing the 'naturalistic fallacy' is an extreme example of the problem with some evolutionary psychologists: they assume that any behaviour that people have traditionally shown must have evolved for a specific purpose, and that changing it would be 'against human nature' and thus either impossible or 'evil'. The Kanazawa sort of evolutionary psychologist has a remarkable amount in common with fundie creationists. Indeed, he more-or-less says so himself:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201104/why-liberals-and-conservatives-are-both-wrong-about-evolut