I take it that you agree with him that it was primarily wasting time trying to negotiate with repug pretend moderates that held it up and not discussions of the public option. So you think he should have also mentioned that certain centrist Dems dragged their feet? Was that really relevant to making his case against dana milibank? To not mention that is rewriting history?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
