You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #42: They're interns. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #28
42. They're interns.
Thing about internship programs is that they have extremely high wash-out rates.

Intern in year 1, intern year 2, and you're looking at a higher wash-out rate than student teaching + 2 years in the classroom.

I've known teachers who have done the intern route to certification and they all say it's unwieldy: First-year teachers that have been fairly well trained have no time to eat or breathe, they're so busy with stuff at school, wrangling paper, preparing lessons. Now, take a new teacher who isn't well trained *and* has to continue their own training.

There's positive feedback on new ideas that work. In this case, it's not a new idea. Moreover, it doesn't really work. For a few thousand $ you can pay for a post-bac program that provides better training than TFA does *and* includes student teaching (this also isn't a new idea).

Could it get worse for our children? Yes. In trying to increase our ranking administrators have two choices: They can get the bottom 25% of students to do better or get the top 25% of students to do better. The bottom 25% has a bigger impact, feels good, has all the right ideological content behind it. But in working on the bottom 25% you take time to review, review, review--and unless you have enough good students to form separate classes *and* there's no obvious racial/religious/ethnic skew to peeling out the good students you warehouse them in classrooms that are reviewing and reviewing and reviewing. Those few additional percentage points at the bottom show up in the rankings--but the real drivers of scientific and engineering innovation aren't those students, but the 10% at the top. They're "privileged" and "advantaged," so we don't give a hang about them. It's bending the future innovation curve downwards.

The usual come back is that a good teacher can find work to keep the high-achieving kids engaged. Right. You teach two courses, differentiate both courses for limited-English proficient students, handle the special needs kids' IEPs, help teach reading to the junior at a 7th grade reading level, deal with the kids in the class that failed last year, deal with classroom management issues, reporting requirements, and the incessant high-stakes standardized tests and what do you get? A teacher who's already swamped being told that because s/he can't differentiate two courses 9 ways each instead of the 8 ways s/he already needs to and the 3 ways there's actually time for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC