Obama’s Budget: Freezing the Poor
By Amy Goodman
Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 900 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller.
February 15, 2011
(Paragraph #1) President Barack Obama unleashed his proposed 2012 budget this week, pronouncing, proudly: “I’ve called for a freeze on annual domestic spending over the next five years. This freeze would cut the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade, bringing this kind of spending—domestic discretionary spending—to its lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president.”
(Paragraph #2 Focus on the word “freeze.” That is exactly what many people might do, if this budget passes as proposed. While defense spending increases, with the largest Pentagon funding request since World War II, the budget calls for cutting in half a program called Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, or LIHEAP.
(Paragraph #3 LIHEAP offers block grants to states so they can offer financial assistance to low-income households in order to meet home energy needs, mostly for heating. Most of its recipients are the elderly and disabled. The program is currently funded at more than $5 billion. Obama is calling for that to be slashed to $2.57 billion—roughly half. This life-or-death program, which literally can help prevent people from freezing to death, represents less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the proposed $3.7 trillion annual budget.
Paragraph #4 Compare this with the proposed military budget. “Defense spending” is a misnomer. Until 1947-48, the Pentagon was officially, and appropriately, called the War Department. In the proposed budget released on Valentine’s Day, the Department of Defense request is $553 billion for the base budget, an increase of $22 billion above the 2010 appropriation. The White House has touted what it calls “$78 billion” in cuts that Defense Secretary Robert Gates is considering. But as the Institute for Policy Studies notes: “The Defense Department talks about cutting its own budget—$78 billion over five years—and most reporting takes this at face value. It shouldn’t. The Pentagon is following the familiar tradition of planning ambitious increases, paring them back and calling this a cut.”
Read the full article at:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obamas_budget_freezing_the_poor_20110215/I received the following edit notice:
"The moderators on duty have determined by consensus that this message does not meet Democratic Underground's community standards. This message will remain hidden from public view until you edit it. If you do not wish to edit the message, you may choose to self-delete it without penalty. The moderators have requested an edit for the following reason:
Moderator comments
Five paragraphs were included from the source, please limit citations to no more than four paragraphs
Note: you only have one opportunity to edit a message. If you submit an edited message that still does not meet Democratic Underground's community standards, you will be forced to delete the message and you will be locked out of posting for a brief penalty period of 15 minutes."
I only included four, not five paragraphs from the article, in compliance with Democratic Underground rules therefore I there is nothing to edit in the post. The DU rule is clear in this regard: "Do not post entire copyrighted articles. If you wish to reference an article, provide a brief excerpt and include a link to the original source. Generally, excerpts should not exceed three or four paragraphs."Better Believe It