You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gunderson discusses radiation threat to US [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
robdogbucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-23-11 06:53 PM
Original message
Gunderson discusses radiation threat to US
Advertisements [?]
Video:

http://www.fairewinds.com/updates

Epidemiologist, Dr. Steven Wing and nuclear engineer, Arnie Gundersen, discuss the consequences of the Fukushima radioactive fallout on Japan, the USA, and the world. What are the long-term health effects? What should the government(s) do to protect citizens?


Pretty down to earth discussion, as always by Arne. Take aways from first listen included some things I was not aware of. Firstly, even though the acute danger of being closer to the source of any radiation, there are other hazards associated with being dosed much smaller amounts at a great distance, as we are here in the US. The amount of radiation released though, still causes the same amounts of cancers, wether exposure is nearer or far away.

We must not ignore other sources of radiation while waiting to learn if these smaller but cumulative deposits of radiation from Fukushima will persist here (even small radiation deposits over a long period of time is damaging), how extensive and how long deposits of low doses of radiation on us here will be. It is not over no matter what we are currently being led to believe by the entities that brought us to this point.

Best not to panic as at this time either, as we do not know for how long we will absorb these apparent currently small doses of radiation, better to put pressure on our government officials to devise a more sane energy policy. There is presently no danger in eating a trout from a stream in Idaho, but the fish higher in the food chain in the Pacific, e.g. salmon and tuna, should be monitored and probably avoided until we know for how long radiation will be dumped into the ocean from Fukushima. We need to put pressure on our government to make those in industry that benefitted from the disaster and continue to proceed without taking worse case scenarios seriously when planning nuclear power plants.

We do know those same fish swimming off Fukushima are the same fish that migrate to west coast fisheries.

I was inspired to post this from that other thread by Generic Other and the issue of radiation monitoring and reporting, etc.

Hope this link enables more to hear this rather sane discussion without sugar coating anything.



Just my dos centavos

robdogbucky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC