Reply #64: That's a nice coverall statement that means nothing, in case you missed it, there was no apology in

[Uncle Joe]

my posts.

I was filling in actual substance, something that's sorely lacking with too many re: the Pavlovian Bell word "NAFTA."

One other point if you actually read my posts, the very first one starts out siding with Grayson and criticizing the Congress, (that would be both parties) for not treating NAFTA nor any other "free trade agreement" as a treaty; which would require a 2/3 Senate vote for approval.