You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #3: So, was he indicted or wasn't he? [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » General Discussion

Cerridwen

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Apr-28-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1

3. So, was he indicted or wasn't he?

I'm not sure quite what you're saying.

As to Andrew Wakefield, wasn't his "research" published in the peer reviewed Lancet which is what gave his "research" such validity? It took the Lancet, what, 10 years to rescind their "seal of approval" and you think the general populace should be more knowledgeable than the "authorities" in medical research?

So, anyway, was Poul Thorsen indicted? If so, does the indictment call into question any research to which he's contributed?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.