Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chafee Gives Reluctant Support to Bolton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bossy Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:47 PM
Original message
Chafee Gives Reluctant Support to Bolton
May 10, 6:38 PM EDT

Chafee Gives Reluctant Support to Bolton

By ANNE GEARAN
AP Diplomatic Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- One of the moderate Republicans who has been wavering on the nomination of John R. Bolton to be the U.S. ambassador to United Nations said Tuesday he will reluctantly support the embattled nominee.

Rhode Island Republican Sen. Lincoln Chafee's decision gives momentum to Bolton ahead of a Senate committee vote on Thursday. Chafee said he decided to support Bolton because he is President Bush's choice.

"I won't deny a lot of the information certainly brings great pause, but I fight the administration on so many issues this is one of those that I've been with them on - to appoint their team," Chafee said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Weeks of inquiry into Bolton's conduct in office also left three other GOP members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee leaning toward supporting Bolton or unwilling to write him off.
(more)
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/UN_AMBASSADOR?SITE=SCCOL&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damn POS! There is no way on this planet he can justify that.
Edited on Tue May-10-05 05:49 PM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Any Senator who votes in favor of Captain Toupee is only doing it...
...out of political expediency. He is the absolute WRONG choice for the ambassadorship. I cannot think of anyone WRONGER!:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Spineless.
Dems better target him hard in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. They got to him (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. They must have. What has he got to lose now?
Aren't his re-election chances toast?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. No, they didn't have to
Chafee has basically voted the Bush line during the last several years, and just gets a pass from so many people because he is actually pro-choice and he *talks* like he's a moderate on other issues. His voting record is more conservative than most Southern Dems who are routinely vilified around here- including even Zell Miller on most issues.

But I do feel for Rhode Islanders, as their next Senatorial election will be a tough choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. makes me wonder what favors were granted him!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomofthehill Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. THEY DID NOT GET TO HIM
We did, we had a good candidate to run against him and possibly win. Instead the Democratic candidate was forced out of the race and now Chefee is off the hook to do what ever he wants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. There ya go
never trust a republican. never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Chafee sold his soul so the gop would support his re-election bid
pathetic. For the people , by the the people----bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a putz
I guess if Bush wanted to appoint Himmler, Chafee would go along with it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. His father had character....Lincoln has a spine composed of linguine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. What a bastard!!!
My goodness, that asshole still doesn't get it. The Repugs (and some Dems) keep saying "The President has a right to have the team he wants."

That's utter bullshit. The President has a right to APPOINT who he wants.....that doesn't been he has a right to their confirmation. What happened to advise and consent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lady lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. I want to know what Rove says to these guys
that always makes them fall in line. What can you possibly say that would make someone sell their soul - or at least their integrity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. I want to know if he ever once voted against one of Clinton's choices
I want to know if he is a hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. So tell me again why we're running an anti-choice
Dem against him? Do we actually WANT to lose that seat? It certainly seems like it, since we're trying our hardest to just give the race to him.

For all the lionizing of this man on this site, Chafee and the other supposed moderate republicans have voted lockstep with this administration since January. So much for that crack in the republican solidarity.

And we could have an incredible chance to get his seat in RI, but instead will likely lose it over abortion. It would certainly be a tough call for me- a supposed moderate who is at least very pro-choice versus a fairly moderate anti-choice Dem? Glad I don't have to vote in that one.

Sometimes there actually is an advantage to being forced to choose between a right wing Nazi Christo-fascist Smith-Friedman wannabe nutjob and a DLC style centrist as we usually get to do in Texas. Makes our lives so much easier. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Didn't Zogby or some other pollster report that 80% of Rhode Islanders
were against Bolton? What does the GOP have hanging over wimpy little Chafee's head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Reluctant is so much worse than whole hearted
fucking wimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Chafee is not a moderate republican, he is a right-wing republican. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Bottom line...he is a Republican
Whether "moderate" or not.

Same as Collins and Snowe. I don't trust them at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Cracks Showing in the Pro-Bolton Facade:
May 10, 2005
Cracks Showing in the Pro-Bolton Facade: Paula Dobriansky Next in Line for U.N. Job?

TWN has just learned that State Department officials are worried that Bolton's nomination will not go through.

The combination of stone-walling, withholding of key documents, shenanigans related to the long-awaited NSA intercepts and names of U.S. officials requested by John Bolton, dysfunctional behavior questions, and recent relevations about the extent that Colin Powell and Richard Armitage felt they needed to go to guard themselves and U.S. diplomatic efforts from the potential damage that John Bolton might do has seriously undermined the administration's confidence in the nomination.

There is a crack in the facade of the pro-Bolton forces.

The Office of the Vice President and the Secretary of State refuse to acknowledge that the Bolton nomination is limping -- and there has been a tremendous game of psychological warfare underway to convince Bolton opponents that a party line vote is on its way.

This is not the case -- at least not by my read of circumstances.

There are several names quietly being floated as the back-up alternative to John Bolton, the most prominent and impressive of whom is Paula Dobriansky, currently Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs.

There are others being discussed, but TWN has not confirmed how serioualy these other candidates are being considered. . .while TWN has confirmed that back room gossip is that Dobriansky is a strong alternative candidate.

The Center for Security Policy has cynically argued that those who oppose John Bolton are really just sore losers about the 2004 Presidential Race. I disagree, strongly.

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/000597.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. it looks like he read his latest polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. Time for Chafee to go, who's running against him in 2006?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. They're all alike
when it comes right down it, NEVER EVER think that a repuke by chance might do the decent thing. :banghead: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kissy, Kissy....Lincoln.... and you father must be feeling like Chimp's
about now. Not that I liked George I...he was disgusting..but his son is even more disgusting and doesn't have the intellectual capacity of the father...not that Poppy had much...but still.

Lincoln Chaffee .....a joke. But, his poll numbers went up in Rhode Island...and that's all these politicians care about. So, short of "death threats" and "Plane offings" we gotta figure it was his poll numbers. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. OK, now appoint Michael Jackson head of UNICEF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. Republicans are such amazing spineless cowards!!
I have never met a breed more cowardly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCLA Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. Lets get him out of there!! We should be able to take that seat!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
28. keep in mind that chafee was one of the few who voted against
giving * the authority to go into iraq, which is more than I can say for most of the senate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
29. Wonder how much it cost.
What's a soul going for these days, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
31. Piss off, Linc
Or should that be "Lancelot Link, Secret Chimp Fan"

Fucking tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
32. "Because he is President Bush's choice"
Edited on Tue May-10-05 09:08 PM by Generator
Rant ahead:

Excuse me for SCREAMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You stupid fuckhead BUSH choice means it's not the BEST this country can do you fuckhead-GOD in HEAVEN is this a cult of personality-is there NOTHING you stupid fucking politicians won't do to lick his ass-to get another TERM??? Selling out your conscience your soul your real GOD your countrymen..is there nothing you won't do?


HISTORY is watching
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC