Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santorum Regrets Making Hitler Comment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:43 AM
Original message
Santorum Regrets Making Hitler Comment
Sure you do, Santorum....

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Sen. Rick Santorum says he "meant no offense" by referring to Adolf Hitler while defending the GOP's right to ban judicial filibusters as Senate leaders prepared to start a countdown Friday to a vote over whether to stop minority senators from blocking President Bush's judicial nominees.

"Referencing Hitler was meant to dramatize the principle of an argument, not to characterize my Democratic colleagues," Santorum, the No. 3 Republican in the GOP leadership in the Senate, said of his remarks Thursday.

more...

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/FILIBUSTER_FIGHT?SITE=NVLAS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go to hell, Ricky.
Asshat. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Funny...
Edited on Fri May-20-05 11:48 AM by Stand and Fight
We posted at the same time and had the same thought in regards to Santorum:

ASS-HAT



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logician Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Needs to be flushed
Next election. Let's hope Pennsylvanians remember all of his stupidity and arrogance.

Let's hope they are all flushed....and that progressives/liberals reclaim our land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devinsgram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
68. Don't worry about that,
the election isn't till next year and his main opponent is already 14 points ahead of him. Just keep making those comments Ricky, you are doing a bang up job of helping yourself lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad, you still need to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good.
The jerk is catching fire for his idiocy and now he's trying to back-peddle. Someone help me grab the ass-hat and hold his feet to the fire!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. He flunks history AND charm school.
And Ethics 101.

It's enough to make me move to Pennsylvania just to work for his next opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
75. That's funny - I called his Capitol Hill office yesterday (Friday) and
said EXACTLY the same thing.

I EAGERLY await his concession speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. I watched his act on CSPAN. It was mainly just a stupid remark.
It was obvious that he was just looking for some way to work the "Hitler" word into his presentation. He sounded like a petulant child talking. He did zero damage to the Dems. He sounds like an inexperienced, small time preacher with no congregation. Get ordained Rick and work up your spiel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. wonder if he ever paid the school district its money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
48. He's just waiting for the next Schiavo to exploit
He should go back to trying to ban the NWS from having a website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Idiot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
50. Those photographs! ERRRRRRRRGH!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. Go to hell freak
Appology NOT accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. remember the stink
about the fake ad on moveon.com.......saying we Democrats were comparing bush to hilter..........they still raise the subject to this day.it was on crossfire after the ad about the new star wars and frisk...

no..we accept no apology!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
76. We DEFINITELY do not accept his "apology."
What he said smacks of that pathetic "I'm sorry if some people were offended..." line that might sound good to people who aren't paying much attention, but subtly absolves the guilty of any guilt and throws the onus back on those who "had the nerve, stupidity, bad judgment, and no sense of humor to get themselves all offended by what I said." He's not a BIT sorry - at least about the Hitler comment. He was trying to get it on the record in some way, to plant a seed in people's minds a la the old if-you-repeat-something-often-enough-it-eventually-gets-PERCEIVED-as-true strategy. He's just sorry he got nailed for it. He thought he could sneak this under the radar and people all over the place called him on it and gave him shit. Which he deserves. May he eat all of it, and more.

As I said, I EAGERLY await his concession speech. I'm budgeting now, for the rest of the year, specifically so I can donate to his opponent's campaign (and those running against a few other "choice" targets).

I despise rick sanctimonious. Can't wait to see him unemployed and defanged and discredited and reeking of Loser Sstench. Except, unfortunately, they'll probably find some nice cushy job for him on Pox "news."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. "No offense," Asshat, but...


Here, have a seat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:48 AM
Original message
Hit the showers, Rick...
You're finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. He's not sorry.
Edited on Fri May-20-05 11:48 AM by LiviaOlivia
If he had any decency or a brain he wouldn't have said it in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
72. Perhaps the story has changed, because I can't find reference...
... to Santorum at all in the present story of the link provided.

But, if I read the excerpt of the OP correctly, Santorum didn't apologize. He expressed "regrets" which is a long way from an apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiegranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. what? actual backlash
for a big mouth bloviating rednecklican? how unexpected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Say what you really think, and then apologize,
Edited on Fri May-20-05 11:52 AM by Kurovski
say what you really feel and then apologize.

Republicans have done it for years and with regularity.

Democratic leaders must learn the lesson. Do what they do because it works, it gets the message out and signals the base. The apology assuages most others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. I see your point, but...
my reaction is usually negative when I see a politician apologize. It usually displays one or both of the following:

1) Insincerity. I'm always reminded of Eddie Haskel: "Gee, I'm sorry Mrs. Cleaver, I would never deliberately offend little Theodore".

2) Weakness: "This is what I really think, but I certainly wouldn't want to offend anyone, so I take it back. Will you forgive me please?" (said while whimpering and cringing).

I prefer sincere people with backbone I can respect. Instead we have manipulators who are always playing some angle. They make me sick. But that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. Excellent points.
Edited on Fri May-20-05 02:45 PM by Kurovski
It works well for the R's is what I'm saying here.

Saying something straight out often leads to a round-robin of spin.

Putting a message into an edgy statement that will get wide press, and then apologizing, ends the endless discussion and arm-wrestling.

"I apologized" you say. End of discussion. To continue the discussion gives the appearance of whining after someone has apologized. The sincerity matters not at all. Go ahead and question the sincerity, but it gets you nowhere. It certainly does not get your message out.

When it comes to communicating and using the media, or any other platform, The Republicans do not waste time with things that do not work.

All too often, taking the high ground simply does not work. It just does not resonate in some quarters.

But understand this:I agree with you. Politics are as filthy as they've ever been, It has worked for Pubs and they've won by creating a perception of the Dem's that is inaccurate at best.

The R's did the one thing we're all supposed to despise: they've built themselves up by knocking the other guy down. It's a classic business model, and it works.

You can knock the living shit out of Republican party and still maintain truth and integrity, because what they have done on so many issues is just so outrageous. And dangerous.

But if that message does not resonate with enough people, forget about it.

All media is hot media these days. A small percentage of us read.

I think you can look to the style of Randi Rhodes to see the kind of message that people will remember, and her affection for anyone else who is interested in the truth is apparent. It doesn't matter what party you belong to, she's interested in fairness AND she's tough.

Of course she's not a politician, and doesn't have to apologize at all if she doesn't want to.

Geez, I mean look Rush on the other end of the spectrum. And he could give a rat's rear end about accuracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. Kurovski, good post! You're absolutely right...
Taking the high ground may not work, but I don't know that it's really been tried. Speaking from personal experience, I have fought some very large battles in my life as a small guy against big organizations, and I have always won. I never apologize. I hammer and shame the opposition - ruthlessly. Politically this may not work because the masses are so clueless. The very idea of being "stand-up" is completely foreign to so many these days. Honor and integrity are vanishing virtues; at best they are optional. And the media is too dumb, lazy, and/or biased to do its job. So the deck is stacked against us.

But at some level I think I'd rather lose the war than see our guys become like them. Did you see the movie "Ransom" where the father of a kidnapped boy turns the tables on the kidnappers and pursues them ruthlessly? That's the kind approach I'm talking about. Taking our powerful, righteous anger and thrashing the opposition continuously. Being on the side of good - being right - is extremely powerful, and apologizing is a betrayal to the cause; it completely diminishes one's power because it's tantamount to saying you aren't right; and the only thing our side has going for it is now is that we're right.

Even if we CAN take the country back, I don't know if the US can be united. The corporate fascists will still be there, much of the population will still be dumb as a box of rocks, and at best, power will trade hands every few years. The divisions are too deep, too heartfelt, and too fundamental to be healed in my lifetime. But I think the high ground (seizing good causes and attacking ruthlessly) is our only hope, faint though that may be.

I think we're saying pretty much the same thing. I enjoy you posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Pretty much, yes. It's about getting tough
with facts and reality.

And playing the game as it's been re-drawn. The Republican party openly declared war on Dems and Liberals (from the steps of the Capitol, no less) many years ago.

It was Trent Lott who spoke, if I recall correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
65. the old saw...
it's easier to ask for forgiveness, than permission still holds true for the repukes. how many times are they going to use this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. santorum is at the end of the trail. I would be surprised if he even
bothers to run again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Isn't there some sort of statement(s) that the Right throws around about
"losing the battle when you compare your opponent to Hitler" or something to that effect?

Esp. ironic when the term fill-in-the-blank-a-Nazi is tossed liberally around by one of their own?

And wouldn't the percentage of American NeoNazis voting Repub far outweigh the percentage voting Dem (when stuck with only two choices - no extremely-far-right candidate on the slate)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. How do you mean no offense when evoking the name of Adolf Hitler?
WTF, of course he meant offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Pennsylvanians - tell me
his days R numbered - please, please, please tell me his days R numbered. Your beautiful state deserves better than this rong wing wacko.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. Unfortunately, he had it BACKWARDS
His Hitler reference better refers to HIS party's ILLEGAL usurpation of power through rigged elections and its FASCIST DOMINATION AND IMPERIALIST AGRESSION here and abroad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. Does he admit that his little "analogy"
made NO SENSE whatsoever? Really, I didn't get it at all.

snip>>But on Thursday, Santorum said that Democratic protests over Republican efforts to ensure confirmation votes would be like the Nazi dictator seizing Paris and then saying: "I'm in Paris. How dare you invade me? How dare you bomb my city? It's mine."

Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. I've looked at this a lot of different ways
and it doesn't make sense. Does he mean we never had a filibusted until the dems invented it 4 years ago??? That's the only thing he could mean but that's just so stupid I can't believe he would even say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. I think he's implying that the Dems think they own the government?
Makes NO sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. In last election, I don't believe, he won by much... Maybe someone
can check this out. If so, he will definitely go down with big numbers. Most of the Blue Stater's are thinking people and they're going throw out all these rotten basters out!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. I will say this
He did say "it was a mistake." That's a step up from the usual "I apologize if anyone was offended" sort of nonsense that follows an intemperate remark. As loathe as I am to cut this clown any slack whatsoever, I do have to give him credit for admitting that his offensive locution was a mistake.

That being said, he should resign anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. Dan Savage, the gay sex guru..
has a special honor for Santorum. He named a sex-related substance after him.

Savage decided that "the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex" should be called Santorum.

http://www.nndb.com/people/478/000022412/

It's one of those images that sticks with you. I can't see Rick's name or see his face without thinking of that substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I know me too! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Man, I'm glad these guys are ok with Ricky's statements! ---
Edited on Fri May-20-05 12:40 PM by Dhalgren
"The Republican Jewish Coalition applauded the statement. "Sen. Santorum is sensitive to the effect of his words and the inappropriateness of the analogy," Executive Director Matthew Brooks said."

Never mind that the actual analogy was stupid and incorrect, at least he's "sensitive" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. The BEST Santorum site. Do you know the definition of Santorum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. LOL... very funny!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. He's sorry that anybody was offended, not the same as a real apology
Once agan, a non apology. "I meant no offense" puts the onus on the people who were offended. In other words, "What I did was right and good and noble so how could anyone be offended?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
69. Yeah I use to get that one from my brother all the time
When we'd argue he'd say - I'm sorry you have a problem with what I'm saying.

It is a way to deflect blame and responsability from yourself for your actions. Republicans have perfected this to the point that they actually beleive in the sincerity of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. The Pot Regrets Calling The Kettle Black
Especially when the pot is cast-iron and the kettle is copper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. He regrets getting caught saying it.
Nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
33. Anybody have a picture of Ricky's "residence" in PA? The one he is
raising 6 kids in that he used to justify sucking on the the PA taxpayer tit for their education?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Try thse url's. And thank Allegheny County
The picture:

http://www2.county.allegheny.pa.us/RealEstate/Image.asp?CurrBloLot=0367G00075000000&Name=Santorum&SingleResult=True

Parcel ID: 0367-G-00075-0000-00
 
 Owner Name: SANTORUM RICHARD J & KAREN GARVER SANTORUM (W)
 Property Location: 111 STEPHENS LN
VERONA , PA 15147

If that doesn't work, go to this one and type in "Santorum" under "Owner's Name."

http://www2.county.allegheny.pa.us/RealEstate/Search.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Try again...
www2.county.allegheny.pa.us/RealEstate/Search.asp

(type in Santorum under "Owner's Name...")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
34. Envoke the Enabling Act, Ricky...isn't that was the nuke option and new
Patriot act are all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orion The Hunter Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. RE: What a yutz
I cannot believe Santorum and Arlen Specter are even from the same state...one guy at least has some modicum of sense, and the other guy is Rick Santorum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. Well, Kind of
Remember Specter is the author of the JFK magic bullet theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. I Regret That Santorum Is Completely Insane and A Hypocrite...
He was so "outraged" at Byrd quoting a historian re: Hitler's government changes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. Unh unh unh, you didn't say the magic words, Rick !!
Edited on Fri May-20-05 02:07 PM by DinahMoeHum
I.
AM.
SORRY.
PLEASE.
FORGIVE.
ME.

Your "apology" is not accepted.

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. It is easier to ask for forgiveness than beg for permission...
I have noticed the majority of the Republican party LIVES by this catchy little phrase...Santorum no exception

Funny, they get away with it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
40. keep all of these flustered fools backpedaling and on the defensive.
that's exactly where we want them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
44. I regret that his parents made Santorum. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
46. He'll never be confused with a statesman.
Dumb analogy from a rather dimbulb mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
47. Funny, when I think of hitler, I think of republicans.
Both were/are ultra right wing moron* fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
51. Where does it say he regrets anything?
All he does is defend his use of it and that he "meant no offense".

That's not regret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corker Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
52. FU Santurdbrain
This guy has no redeeming qualities at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
53. So, he doesn't regret it.
He just 'meant no offense' by it.

Of course, how could he mean no offense while comparing someone to Hitler? Well, maybe to Santorum, Adolf Hitler doesn't seem so bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #53
66. maybe he just regrets the inevitable repercussions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
54. What Nazi wrote this? When did the GOPukes have a right to ban
judicial filibusters? They have no right whatsoever. They just cheat to win all the time. And the bought and paid for lap dog press just assumes that "We The People" are stupid enough to eat this bull feces. Santorum is a Nazi anyway in my opinion. Guilty people always accuse the innocent of their crimes.
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
55. I don't regret my demand for his resignation n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
58. A touch of projection there Gruppenfuehrer Santorum.
Adolf Hitler would be so proud of you. You rat fuck Nazi son of a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robworld Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
59. He should apologize for being inaccurate
Over throwing the government with right wing senators, right wing congress, and right wing judges is more like the Nazi parties action then anything else.
Santorum is an idiot, and should take a history lesson.

http://www.dumdumgoestothecircus.com /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
60. He made a similar statement once before.
Except he accused the NY Times of being Nazi-like.

http://santorumexposed.home.comcast.net/

Scroll down.

-as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Did you say he has 6 kids!
Man, my Gaydar must be broke.......I would have sworn.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
62. Fuck you, little Ricky.
The little bastard knows the end is nigh for the Republican House and Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
63. dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
64. Regrets it?
Not really. Not YET, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
67. And Strom Thurman wasn't a hypocritical racist either. Santorum should
resign or call for his resignation. Stop the anti-American name calling from Republicans NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
70. The #3 GOP Senator *ugh*
That just means you're the Senate's 3rd biggest lying hypocrite. This Pennsylvanian is disgusted you ever made Dog Catcher.

On the local news here (Philly burbs) he said his remarks were "off the cuff." Add a lie on top of the smear Ricky! Way to be a complete assclown!!

It's absolute BS, they were intentional and rehearsed, and this damage control isn't anything but transparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
71. Pot meet kettle
Sounds like Santorum was projecting a little. THEY are the ones acting like fascists, not Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
73. I think Santorum you should be locked up....
Locked up in a very nice padded cell and never be let out again. Thinking someone is like a Nazi for disagreeing with your removal of the filibuster is one thing, threatening and denouncing them as a Nazi is quite another.

It's clear to the whole world who had the Nazi intentions....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
74. SANTORUM GOSSIP--Ya gotta wonder where he spent the night
...if he turns up all mussed up in a badly wrinkled suit. This from WONKETTE:
Wonk'd. Earlier today, an operative wrote: "Saw Rick Santorum about 5 minutes ago ordering his foo-foo drink and muffin...His hair was quite disheveled and badly in need of a trim. Also, it looked like he picked his suit out of the hamper, as it was terribly wrinkled and his collar was half up." We didn't believe it, because usually Santorum's hair is fixed as tight as a Ken doll's. Then we saw this pic from today's National Catholic Prayer Breakfast.

http://www.wonkette.com/politics/remainders/index.php#remainders-bad-hair-day-edition-104481

Tight as a Ken Doll, indeed!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
77. Help! I need Sen. Byrd's statement
that he did not apologize for. It has been used by RWers to show that Santorum apologized but Byrd didn't. What on earth did Byrd say?

This was referenced on Al Franken's show on Thursday, I think, when he had his weekly phone call to his friend who likes Rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. If a little rough language doesn't upset you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. You mean like this???
"Or maybe we could just say this: F*ck Rick Santorum, the dim-witted savage who forced his living children to fondle a prematurely born dead fetus that was supposed to be Santorum spawn number 4. He's merely the loudest virus in the disease of the body politic, a tick on the American vein that needs to be yanked off and popped."
// posted by Rude One @ 9:32 AM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. Well, Tesla, don't know where you're coming from
but I will throw in my lot with the anti-Santorum folks any day. This guy knows what it is like to lose a borderline late term pregnancy. We do not know the terms of this situation. So do we pit a 20 week spontanious miscarriage of a fetus against a late term abortion that was done because it happened not to be spontanious but had to be what is called "partial birth abortion" (even tho that is nowhere found in medical literature!)to preserve the life or health of the woman?

Where is this guy's empathy for anyone else facing this situation? What would he have them do?

I think Rick Santorum is a nut case. I feel VERY sorry for his wife and kids!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. Thank you, Career Prole
That link was very instructive. Byrd was right on, as usual. Santorum was offensive, illogical, and abusive. AAAARGH!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PittPoliSci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
79. i bet he regrets it.
It will be his downfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paula Sims Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
83. The only thing he regrets is getting caught.
He couldn't care and less. Remember it's Santorum who, when confronted with Bush's breaking a campaign promise, said: "If it's a bad promise, he doesn't have to keep it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
84. Wasn't Ricky part of the group slamming Byrd for mentioning Hitler?
I thought he was. Funny how the perception changes when it's your words, huh Ricky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC