Special Education Ruling's Effects Unclear
By ELISSA GOOTMAN
Published: November 17, 2005
It may take years to assess fully the impact of the Supreme Court ruling on Monday on disputes between school districts and the parents of special education students, experts across the country have said.
The decision gives parents who disagree with the individualized education plans the burden of proving that the plans are inadequate.
Advocates for disabled children greeted the ruling with dismay. In some states, they acknowledge, it will have virtually no effect. In others, the effects remain to be seen. Some advocates are looking for ways around the ruling, like seeking state or federal laws to shift the burden of proof to school districts.
... Arlene Mayerson, directing lawyer of the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund....said she believed that at the very least some parents would be deterred from pursuing complaints against school districts. She added that districts, knowing that parents have to assemble convincing cases, might be less likely to compromise beforehand....
***
Essentially, states fall into three categories on disputes over individualized education plans. One group includes Texas, Virginia and Maryland, where the Supreme Court upheld what has been in practice. The second group includes New Jersey and New York, where the burden of proof shifts to the parents. In the third group, states including Alabama and Connecticut have regulations or statutes that place the burden of proof on school districts....
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/17/politics/politicsspecial1/17parents.html