Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Special Education Ruling's Effects Unclear

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 09:46 AM
Original message
NYT: Special Education Ruling's Effects Unclear
Special Education Ruling's Effects Unclear
By ELISSA GOOTMAN
Published: November 17, 2005


It may take years to assess fully the impact of the Supreme Court ruling on Monday on disputes between school districts and the parents of special education students, experts across the country have said.

The decision gives parents who disagree with the individualized education plans the burden of proving that the plans are inadequate.

Advocates for disabled children greeted the ruling with dismay. In some states, they acknowledge, it will have virtually no effect. In others, the effects remain to be seen. Some advocates are looking for ways around the ruling, like seeking state or federal laws to shift the burden of proof to school districts.

... Arlene Mayerson, directing lawyer of the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund....said she believed that at the very least some parents would be deterred from pursuing complaints against school districts. She added that districts, knowing that parents have to assemble convincing cases, might be less likely to compromise beforehand....

***

Essentially, states fall into three categories on disputes over individualized education plans. One group includes Texas, Virginia and Maryland, where the Supreme Court upheld what has been in practice. The second group includes New Jersey and New York, where the burden of proof shifts to the parents. In the third group, states including Alabama and Connecticut have regulations or statutes that place the burden of proof on school districts....


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/17/politics/politicsspecial1/17parents.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can predict some effects of this ruling:
1. Towns embroiled in a variety of lawsuits. Tax dollars towards attorneys, experts, surveys, trial prep, trial, appeal.

2. Worried parents initiating suits against their municipalities. Unless it's a class action, these plaintiffs will be strapped for funding for this legal pursuit. Attorneys specializing in this field will be minimum. They will need money for expert psychologists, special education experts, experts in public education, etc. And in the meantime, this issue won't be resolved for years while their children are losing time.

End result: Nobody wins. The issue may be arbitrarily resolved. But nobody wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC