http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/news/15090898.htmCONNIE MABIN
Associated Press
CLEVELAND - Cuyahoga County's "nightmare election" with delayed results, absent poll workers and other problems can be blamed partly on an overconfident, overwhelmed elections board and a voting machine maker's questionable marketing, according to an outside review.
Besides outlining what went wrong with the May 2 primary in Ohio's most populous county, the 394-page report lays out a series of recommendations for improvements ranging from more public input to better planning.
Among other problems with the county's first election using Diebold Inc.'s touch-screen and optical-scan voting systems, some poll workers didn't show up or were not sufficiently trained in electronic voting. Vote counts were delayed six days when roughly 18,000 absentee ballots had to be hand-counted because of incorrect ballots designed by the board and could not be scanned.
The review by a board-appointed panel comprised of a judge, a law professor and the director of the state lottery commission found that most of the problems were predicted as early as January by a contractor working for Diebold, but the board did not heed the warnings...
ON THE NET
Cuyahoga County elections board:
http://www.boe.cuyahogacounty.usReview panel:
http://www.cuyahogavoting.org Recommendations of panel that reviewed Cuyahoga elections
Associated Press
http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/news/15090905.htmAn independent panel reviewing Cuyahoga County's botched May 2 primary made several recommendations for reform. The panel, led by Cleveland Municipal Judge Ronald Adrine, included Thomas Hayes, a former elections board director who is director of the Ohio Lottery Commission, and Candice Hoke, a Cleveland State University law professor who recently stepped down as director of the CSU Center for Election Integrity.
Among other changes, the panel said the county elections board should:
_Improve training of poll workers by having the state's colleges and universities create a poll worker training program with a core curriculum approved by the Secretary of State; until then, the board should improve the quality of its training.
_Evaluate poll workers after training to measure competence...
Training lax, warnings went ignored, panel says
Friday, July 21, 2006
Joan Mazzolini
Plain Dealer Reporter
http://www.cleveland.com/election/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1153470675195450.xml&coll=2 The election fiasco in Cuyahoga County was the result of widespread dysfunction in the county's election offices, where officials ignored specific warnings of the looming calamity, according to a report released today that blames election chief Michael Vu and deputy chief Gwen Dillingham.
In the 394-page report, a three-member panel concludes its investigation of the flawed May 2 primary with descriptions of breakdown after breakdown at every level of the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections. The problems included poorly trained poll workers, too few workers, the rehiring of poll workers with histories of poor performance, a lack of crucial supplies, error-filled and ambiguous manuals for poll workers, a careless or reckless disregard for security of the voting machines, and the refusal to accept help from outsiders with expertise.
The dysfunction was made worse by a rushed changeover from punch-card voting to electronic machines.
"Director Vu and
Dillingham effectively ordered workers to do the impossible, or nearly impossible, with inadequate resources," the report says. "This is an across-the-board failure to plan and manage the first countywide endeavor in electronic voting." ...
Why the vote count was doomed from start
http://www.cleveland.com/election/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1153470671195450.xml&coll=2
Cuyahoga County's May 2 election was a disaster by just about any measure. An army of temp workers labored for a week to hand-count absentee ballots before voters learned any results. An investigation into the many problems concludes today with the release of 394 pages of findings. What went wrong?
Friday, July 21, 2006
Elections workers were so reckless in their handling of voting machines that three months later, they still can't find a dozen memory cards on which votes were recorded.
Elections workers were prohibited from telling Elections Board members about looming problems, and the board repeatedly broke the state's "sunshine law" with closed-door discussions about the public's business.
TRAINING: Many poll workers found their training so abysmal that they did not show up for work May 2. Elections officials ignored pre-election surveys that 80 percent of the workers thought the training was deficient...
http://www.cleveland.com/election/
TOP STORY
Training lax, warnings went ignored, panel says
The election fiasco in Cuyahoga County was the result of widespread dysfunction in county's election offices
• Related: Why vote count was doomed
• More: Fraud | Warnings | Investigation
• Forum: Talk about it