Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Can Withhold Security Firm Data

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 03:56 AM
Original message
U.S. Can Withhold Security Firm Data
WASHINGTON — The U.S. government can keep secret the names of private security contractors involved in serious shooting incidents in Iraq, a federal judge has ruled, rejecting a Freedom of Information Act request by the Los Angeles Times.

U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper in Los Angeles said Tuesday that she deferred to the judgment of Army officers who said the disclosure could "provide an advantage to insurgents" and aid them in targeting contractors who provide protection at job sites.

Since the U.S. invasion of Iraq nearly 3 1/2 years ago, the Pentagon has relied heavily on private contractors to carry out a variety of tasks, including efforts to rebuild the country. The companies in turn have relied on private security contractors to protect workers and supply lines, and to deter attacks on oil pipelines and the power grid.

The Defense Department said last year that at least 60 private security providers were working in Iraq with perhaps as many as 25,000 employees.

The effectiveness of private security contractors has been unclear. Many have been attacked, and some have been accused of recklessly using deadly force against Iraqi civilians.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-security27jul27,1,6709223.story?coll=la-news-a_section
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Knowing the names could aid insurgents in targeting contractors, huh?
Do they honestly think any Iraqi who has a reason to be, shall we say, interested, doesn't already know who these firms are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why not extend this to private NSA contractors and DoD contractors?
That way, they're all secure from investigation and prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. don't give them any more ideas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC