Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Takes 1st Step in Presidential Bid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:19 AM
Original message
Obama Takes 1st Step in Presidential Bid
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 10:24 AM by jefferson_dem
Obama Takes 1st Step in Presidential Bid

Jan 16 10:10 AM US/Eastern

By NEDRA PICKLER
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Democratic Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois said Tuesday he is taking the first step in a presidential bid, filing paperwork that will allow the newcomer who has rocketed to the top of national politics to raise money for a White House campaign.

Obama announced his intentions to file a presidential exploratory committee on his Web site, http://www.barackobama.com .

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070116/ap_on_el_pr/obama2008

***

VIDEO STATEMENT - http://www.barackobama.com/video/

TRANSCRIPT - http://www.barackobama.com/video/from_barack_transcript/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
itsmesgd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let me ramble a moment about why the dems will get nothing done to stop or limit the shrub..
It would appear with the entrance of so many different candidates into the 2008 fray, that we will spend the next year and a half arguing amongst ourselves. Biden started last week by complaining that South Carolina should take the confederate flag. Way to go, let's fight about stupid shit while the country marches to war.
If it keeps up in this manner, there will be no election, the shrub will appoint himself unitary executive (king) and the rest of us will be rounded up to protect the safety of the king (I mean the nation). This is hyperbole, but to what extent, I don't know. How far are we from king shrub or pres schwarzenager (movement is underway to repeal the ammend preventing a foreign born pres)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Damn that democracy! Too much trouble. We shouldn't bother with it.
His Highness will cancel elections anyway so why should we bother to contest them?

I know countries that have tried that. Seriously. I didn't come away with the opinion that opposition boycotts of elections, not contesting races at all and telling your supporters to stay home, were net positives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. So what?
We had a lot of candidates for the 2004 election, and if gay marriage had not been on the ballot in Ohio, the Amish would not have come out of their holes and voted for Chimpy, we would have a Democratic president right now.


I'm excited to see the rise of Barack Osama, six months ago, I was saying that the choice would come down to Hillary or McCain, unless someone else caught some heavy attention from the media. The only Repuke to do so is Mitt, and they never fail to mention he's a Mormon in each of the stories. They're cleverly trying to split the GOP, into its four main parts, the warriors (McCain), the libertarians (Giuliani), the fundies (Brownback, or whatever other unknown without a snowball's chance in hell), and the find-a-prettyboy-who-can-impress-the-ladies types, who will go for Mitt.


With Obama, we have a real choice, for a real leader, who can unite the American people, and win an election decisively. I wouldn't worry about the antics of Biden, he's totally old news, and after he gets his ten percent in the Delaware primary, he'll slink back into the shadows.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsmesgd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I'm sorry but he cant win
There are too many rich white racists with power and poor white racists with numbers. His middle name will echo throughout the rw radio and tv commericals. He will be trashed to a level that we have never seen before. Remember how the rw treated McCain in South Carolina about stories of a "black baby"?
He has no chance, he will only divide us against ourselves. He is a wedge issue unto himself. Hillary will have the same effect if she should run.

We need to focus on reality, and the reality is that we live in a hateful, class-divided, racist, country where money and hate stomp out ideals and justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm sorry, but if we don't nominate someone because of his/her name then...
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 11:06 AM by Dawgs
we don't deserve to be a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsmesgd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I'm not sanctioning it, I'm just saying that his name and race will be used against him.
If I had my preference on the race and sex of a president, I would have to pick an outspoken, black female along the lines of my highschool algebra teacher Mrs. Williams (savannah-jenkins '91) She was a strong teacher that would have congress and the corporations sitting up straight and behaving within five minutes of her election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. If his middle name is such a big deal explain his landslide victory...
in his bid for the senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Duh. The GOP candidate imploded.
Jack Ryan's sex scandal. Obama would have still done well, but Ryan was way ahead in the polls until the sex scandal made him step down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. I think they would vote for Keys over Saddam ?
huh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. His middle name wasn't common knowledge then...
Plus Keyes was resented as an outsider (he lived in Maryland, not Illinois), and he was a latecomer. Mostly the outsider thing though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. If the Republicans really thought the name would have hurt him ...
it would have been brought up. Everyone knows it's dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Not necessarily
They're not omnipotent, nor do they have unlimited resources--they may not have been aware of it, they may not have thought of it, they may have been too busy scrambling to find a replacement for Jack Ryan to assemble a coherent attack ad mentioning it. Who knows. They imported Alan freaking KEYES for pete's sake, instead of finding an Illinois state legislator to run.

Either way, Jack Ryan (and his kinky sex habits) are just one of several Repuke idiots we can thank for helping us get control of the Senate. Waytogo Jack! You were married to JERI RYAN, and that wasn't enough for you? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #49
62. Again, a well known fact here in Illinois is
that the reason Keyes was brought in to run against Obama was because no one else would do it. And they did try to find someone here in Illinois to do so. But Obama had gotten so popular that those contacted to run against him knew it would be a losing battle and did not want a lost on their record. Keyes was finally brought in, but the republicans already knew that there was no reason to put much backing into the race. Obama had it sewn up from almost the beginning, and would have probably even easily beaten Ryan if he had stayed in. Illinois was ready for a difference and we were tired of things the way they had been. If you think anyone had a chance to beat Obama here in Illinois, you would be mistaken. Oh, about his middle name. If Obama/Osama didn't turn voters off, I know the Hussein would not. You see, we are smart enough to know that 9/11 had to do with Osama and not Saddam. We also know that a name does not make you the same person as someone who shares it. What voters could not get over here was the shared history of the two presidential candidates. "Skulls and Bones" was seen as more of a negative here than any shared name that might have came from an ancestor. We are a state made up of mainly immigrants with names that sound foreign to many. Just look at our governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Exactly
Just as with Katherine Harris running against Nelson (D) for the Florida Senate seat--no GOP legislator wanted a loss on their record.

IIRC Ryan and Obama were neck-and-neck; Obama would not necessarily have easily beaten Ryan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. You tell them, rebel. He was beating Ryan by a mile when Ryan's campaign
imploded. The gop even tried to get Ditka to run against him and he knew it was a loosing proposition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #62
80. If Obama hasn't a chance...? why are the repugs already trying to smear him?!!
Repugs dictate to Dems, Hillary or Edwards is who your candidate will be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. I believe you are mistaken in who's post you are repling to.
I never said that Obama was not electable. In fact I was defending him. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
70. Incompetent Keyes
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 05:40 PM by benny05
He may have been an OK ambassador at some point, but he knew zip about Illinois. But because of him, we who live downstate didn't get a good hearing about Obama's views on the complexity of the issues. Now we will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
61. I have to speak up
Coming from Illinois I disagree with you on the whole Ryan thing. Ryan had lost a lot of popularity because of his treatment of Obama. Having him shadowed, paying a person to harrass Obama was the biggest thing to go against Ryan. His sex scandal was a problem for him as far as the republican party was concerned and they removed him. Also, when he was removed from the race, it was far from being very far in the campaign and too early to know who would or would not have won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. So all the GOP has to do is keep the fear level up
and we'll never get anything but a white male for Prez.
No, someday, somebody has to stand up and face the music, have the discussion, and convince voters that they are the best candidate. These things don't change by themselves. Somebody has to change them. Of course, we could enhance our odds by poutting up somebody with a lot of charisma, which by most accounts Obama has plenty of.

Having said that, I'm not sure he's the best candidate (yet), but just because he's running doesn't mean he'll get the nomination. Let's see how he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. So if not now....when?
In 10 years, 50 years? What is your litmus test to determine when the time is right?

Congrats to Obama for seizing this moment in history!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. Yes! Congratulations to a MAN who sets his own time table
Obama doesn't let anyone tell him that he "can't cause it's not your time!"

He has every right to run and America has every right to decide if he will be their candidate.

Unless I missed something, all of the potential candidates have not indicated their desire to run.

Unless I missed something,the debates have not even been scheduled.

Unless I missed something,the results of an election are not determined by the color of your skin or the spelling of your name.

After GW got selected that lowered the bar for anyone having the ability to be elected.

Let the debate be reflected in our VOTE, not in a middle name or a race.

As Progressive Democrats, IMO, we have tolled long and hard to set the example by our deeds and by our words that "All MEN and WOMEN ARE EQUAL."

OBAMA

:yourock:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Anyone who would vote that way, wouldn't vote for a Democrat anyway
There is NO Democrat who is going to get 100% of the vote. What Democrats are going to aim for is 51% of the electoral college. It would be nice to get a higher percent, but we aren't going to get some states no matter who our candidate is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. While it's true there are a lot of racists
They generally vote for the other party anyway, so who cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
42. Sorry. I think he can win. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aein Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
58. lets not concede the fight before its even been fought IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
89. Racists tend not to vote Democratic anyway, so it's irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
74. Chuck Hagel is running ...

Put some money on Chuck Hagel to run. He is distancing himself from the president to prepare for his push. We all know the next year and a half will be a disaster in Iraq. At that point, McCain will have a hard time distancing himself from Shrub's Iraq policy in any meaningful way. The uber conservatives will try to slam him, but Chuck should have a good ideological platform to capture Republicans who are fed up with Iraq.

BTW, I think the Barack Obama announcement is a good thing. He's a strong candidate and he's better then Hillary. He's very Kennedy-esque. He is seems to be a man of integrity, wit and wisdom. Any of the three would make him a far superior President when compared to shrubby.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama opens presidential exploratory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. 08ama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. So, does this mean Fox got the casting of "24" right for this season?
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 10:44 AM by mnhtnbb
Meaning, that liberal black guy will negotiate with terrorists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe VP, but he's green, never ran a tough race and we need more
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 10:46 AM by wisteria
than feel good empty promises to straighten out our country. He is a good man, but I don't see him as presidential worthy at this time. He has offered up no fresh ideas and has taken no genuine leadership roles in the Senate. Many say he has to seize the moment because he is hot and it may fade as time goes by, well this is not just about Obama, it is about our Country. What is best for our country and right now, I don't think Senator Obama is the choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. He's for immediate withdrawl
and that's a lot better position than all of the others who voted FOR the blank check in Iraq, whether they regret it now, or not. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton were fairly obscure Southern governors at this point in their election cycles, and managed to win. As for experience, well, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld have "experience", maybe the country needs to consider a fresh approach.


Like it did when it elected John F. Kennedy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
51. Since when was he for immediate withdrawal
He was against Kerry/Feingold because it set a date to leave last June.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
92. I so AGREE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Nearly the Bush Opposite
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 10:54 AM by StClone
He came from a international middle class setting. Barack's parents divorced and he was raised by his maternal grandparents. He had little connection with any type of legacy from his father of money or fame, only genes. Success came to Barack at his own hands. I don't know if he is the answer. But, it is really difficult to identify what is needed or what will work best after Bushmonster historic global debacle.

Intriguing fellow offering an interesting option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glide625 Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. I like him a lot!
He's a great antidote to the evil white corporatists and if he's elected with along with another left leaning congressional sweep, he could do a great deal of damage to the American economy, especially if he can screw the elites out of their ill gotten gains before they manage to get out of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. Obama/Edwars and Clark for Sec Def.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JacksonWest Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. Sweet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. I love Barack Obama, but at this point I would rather see him as VP.
Gore/Obama sure sounds nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. He's too green
Yes he's got media, looks, and apparently brains, but we seriously need someone with experience. I think going for pres. this early in his career is just plan wrong. What do his constituents think, about him just being elected and now, for the most part, abandoning them. Hilary made a promise not to run till..well.. now.

Honestly I would like the See Hilary in office, Gore as VP (again) because that would mean BILL would be back in the white house in some fashion. It would lend a fair amount of our seriously lost credibility back to the world.

Heh... Clinton Gore 08, like like old times :) Or better.. Gore Clinton. Why? Because I trust these people. They have a proven record of getting things done. Bill MADE the economy what it was before the GOP destroyed it! We have the people on our side this time. in under 100 hours, the Dems did pretty much their entire roster. Granted they will have to fight the veto the really good legislation is going to get, and dont get me started on those damned signing statements. But Much of what they said is now law, or on the way to being law anyway.

Obama...'16 is more my taste anyway to be honest. Lets get the known capable in to fix it. Then let the fresh ideas in.

>PLINK< My 2 cents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Too green? How experienced was Clinton? It's not about experience...
It's about integrity, foresight, intelligence, tenacity, creativity, compassion, curiosity... THAT makes a great President.

But I do echo concerns that his nomination will rally white racists to vote against him in droves. What a damn shame to feel that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. He'll have 4 years in he Senate by 2008
sitting in DC for 8-12 years won't help him much. This is his time to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. I would vote for him simply because he isn't totally corrupted by corporate money yet
I think he would be a great President. I don't think he can win because he is African American. There are still a lot of ignorant prejudice people that won't vote for him simply because of race. It's fucking sad when some people are so stupid that they will fuck over themselves just to make sure someone can't get ahead because of their race. Fucking sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
57. I don't think race will harm him that much.
As for corporate influence, we really don't yet know. Illinois politics can be questionable and that's where he spent several years. I won't be surprised to see stories coming out over the next several months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
21. You Know, If He Wasn't Hyped So Much, I Might Actually Take A Serious Look At Him (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Yeah, enthusiastic public support for and positive media coverage of an inspiring
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 12:01 PM by jefferson_dem
political figure must be considered a liability, and surely marks an aspiring candidate not even worthy of consideration. :sarcasm:

That being said, i know what you mean...

Typically, i also say "fuck the hype" and avoid bandwagons like the plague. Just not this time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Well, I AM Trying To Learn What I Can About Him
I realize that I have to get by some of my "stuff," but it is hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Obama's AMAZING Legislative Record in Just 2 years in the Senate:
Ethics and Lobbying Reform
Throughout his political career, Barack Obama has been a leader in fighting for open and honest government. During his first year as an Illinois State Senator, he helped lead the fight to pass Illinois' first ethics reform bill in 25 years. As a U.S. Senator, he has spearheaded the effort to clean up Washington in the wake of the Jack Abramoff scandal.

Senator Obama is one of the authors of the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act (S. 2180). The bill would lengthen the cooling off period to two years for lawmakers and staff who seek to become lobbyists, and it would require immediate disclosure as soon as any job negotiations begin. The bill would open conference committee meetings to the public and require that all bills be posted on the Internet for 24 hours before they can be voted on by the Senate. Finally, the bill would end all lobbyist-funded gifts, meals, and travel and strengthen the Senate office that monitors lobbyist disclosure forms.

In addition, Senator Obama has sponsored three other ethics-related bills:

The Congressional Ethics Enforcement Commission Act (S. 2259)
The bill would create an outside ethics commission to receive complaints from the public on alleged ethics violations by members of Congress, staff, and lobbyists. The commission would have the authority to investigate complaints and present public findings of fact about possible violations to the House and Senate Ethics Committee and Justice Department. By taking the initial fact finding out of the hands of members of Congress, who are often reluctant to investigate their colleagues, the bill ensures prompt and fair disposition of public complaints.

To avoid manipulation of the commission for political purposes, any person filing a complaint that they knew to be false would be subject to a fine and/or imprisonment. No complaints could be filed against a member of Congress for 30 days before a primary election and 60 days before a general election.

The bill has been widely endorsed by reform groups. According to Common Cause, "this legislation would do more to reform ethics and lobbying than any other piece of legislation introduced thus far because it goes to the heart of the problem: enforcement." Public Citizen praised Senator Obama "for having the courage to challenge the business-as-usual environment on Capitol Hill and introduce far-reaching legislation." Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington stated: "This is the first bill that deals seriously with the lack of oversight and enforcement in the existing congressional ethics process. . . . This bill will help restore Americans' confidence in the integrity of Congress.

The Transparency and Integrity in Earmarks Act (S. 2261)
The bill would shed light on the almost 16,000 earmarks that were included in spending bills in 2005. Under the bill, all earmarks, including the name of the requestor and a justification for the earmark, would have to be disclosed 72 hours before they could be considered by the full Senate. Senators would be prohibited from advocating for an earmark if they have a financial interest in the project or earmark recipient. And, earmark recipients would have to disclose to an Office of Public Integrity the amount that they have spent on registered lobbyists and the names of those lobbyists.

The Curtailing Lobbyist Effectiveness through Advance Notification, Updates, and Posting Act (The CLEAN UP Act) (S. 2179)
The bill aims to improve public access to information about all legislation, including conference reports and appropriations legislation, in particular after hurried, end-of-session negotiations. Conference committee meetings and deliberations would have to be open to the public or televised, and conference reports would have to identify changes made to the bill from the House and Senate versions. Finally, no bill could be considered by the full Senate unless the measure has been made available to all Senators and the general public on the Internet for at least 72 hours.

Health Care
The United States is one of the wealthiest nations in the world, yet more than 45 million Americans have no health insurance. Too many hard-working Americans cannot afford their medical bills, and thus, health-related issues are the number one cause for personal bankruptcy. Too many employers are finding it difficult to offer the coverage their employees need.

Promoting affordable, accessible, and high-quality health care was a priority for Barack Obama in the Illinois State Senate and is a priority for him in the United States Senate. He believes firmly that health care should be a right for everyone, not a privilege for the few.

Preserving and Improving Medicare and Medicaid
Medicare and Medicaid represent America's commitment to take care of the elderly and the poor--some of our most vulnerable citizens. Senator Obama has voted to preserve and strengthen these programs at every opportunity. He has voted to restore funding to these programs and has voted against budgets that cut these programs.

Medicare

Some 42 million American seniors are served by Medicare, including 1.7 million in Illinois. Medicare is a promise we have made to our seniors, and along with Social Security, it is essential to a dignified and financially sound retirement. Cuts to Medicare will seriously harm those who have worked all their lives, paid into the system, and need medical care.

Senator Obama is concerned about the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program and its effect on our nation's elderly and disabled. In particular, he is concerned with the difficulty enrolling and choosing among a large number of plans (more than 40 in Illinois), the restrictions on changing plan selection after enrollment, the prohibition against negotiating for the best drug price or discounts, and the high costs of the program for seniors.

Senator Obama is a cosponsor of the Medicare Informed Choice Act (S. 1841), which would extend enrollment without penalty until the end of 2006. This bill would also allow all Part D beneficiaries to change their plan once during 2006.

Medicaid

Medicaid is the nation's health safety net. Over 53 million Americans of all ages, including 2 million Illinoisans, rely on Medicaid for their health care. As a member of the Senate's Medicaid Working Group, Senator Obama will continue the fight to strengthen Medicaid, as well as help providers who care for large numbers of poor and uninsured patients.

Improving Quality of Health Care
Senator Obama is pursuing legislative initiatives to help improve health care quality.

He helped draft and introduce the National MEDiC Act (S. 1784), which promotes patient safety initiatives, including early disclosure and compensation to patients injured by medical errors. He also introduced the Hospital Quality Report Card Act (S. 2359), which will use federal hospital quality reporting requirements to inform and assist patients and other consumers in making their health care decisions.

Senator Obama strongly believes that greater use of health information technology can contain costs and improve the efficiency of our health care system. He introduced the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program Efficiency Act (S. 2247), which would leverage the federal government's purchasing power to encourage increased adoption of technology by participating health plans.

In 2005, Senator Obama spoke at the commencement of the University of Chicago's Pritzker School of Medicine about the importance of health information technology. Click here to read that speech.

Avian Flu
Avian influenza - or bird flu - is a potentially grave health threat to the U.S. and other countries around the world. Senator Obama was an early leader in bringing this problem before Congress and pushing for greater funding to improve preparedness.

Starting in March 2005, he obtained $25 million for international efforts to combat the avian flu and called for an inter-agency task force to immediately address this issue. This funding is now being used to mitigate the effects of the pandemic in Southeast Asia.

Senator Obama introduced the Attacking Viral Influenza Across Nations Act (S. 969), which calls for collaboration and cooperation at the state, national, and international level to ensure preparedness in the event of pandemic influenza. Such preparedness includes the procurement of antivirals, development of effective vaccines, and improvement of the public health infrastructure and medical surge capacity in hospitals.

Senator Obama also worked to push $7.9 billion through the Senate to help the U.S. prepare for the possibility of an avian flu pandemic.

Environmental Health
Senator Obama is deeply concerned with the hazards of lead poisoning. Almost 400,000 children have elevated blood lead levels, including many in Illinois. Over the past year, one of his legislative priorities has been highlighting the problems associated with elevated blood lead levels in children. As a member of the Environment and Public Works Committee, Senator Obama pressured the Environmental Protection Agency to issue long overdue rules for home remodeling and renovation that could prevent 28,000 lead-related illnesses each year, resulting in an annual net economic benefit of more than $4 billion.

In 2005, Senator Obama introduced the Lead Free Toys Act (S. 2048), requiring the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to ban any children's product containing lead.

He also introduced the Healthy Communities Act (S. 2047) to identify and address problems in communities that are at high risk from environmental contaminants. In addition, recognizing the contribution of housing, parks, trails, roadways, and public transportation to healthy lifestyles, Senator Obama introduced the Healthy Places Act (S. 2506) to assess and support improvements to the built environment.

Genomics
Genomics is the study of how a person's genetic makeup affects propensity for disease and response to treatment. Research in this area has the potential to predict which people will get sick, diagnose illnesses earlier, and screen patients to determine which drugs will be safe and effective. In August 2006, Senator Obama introduced the Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act of 2006 (S. 3822), which would increase funding for research on genomics, expand the genomics workforce, provide a tax credit for the development of diagnostic tests that can improve the safety or effectiveness of drugs, and reaffirm the need to protect genetic privacy.


Environment
As a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Senator Obama has worked to ensure our nation's environmental laws and policies balance America's needs for a healthy, sustainable environment with economic growth.

Lead
Since coming to Washington, Senator Obama has made the elimination of childhood lead poisoning one of his top priorities.

Over 400,000 children in the U.S. suffer from lead poisoning. Lead is a highly toxic substance that can produce a range of health problems in young children including IQ deficiencies, reading and learning disabilities, reduced attention spans, hyperactivity, and damage to the kidneys, brain and bone marrow. The most common source of lead exposure is lead paint in older housing.

During his first year in office, Senator Obama successfully fought to get the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to publish long-overdue rules for how contractors involved in the renovation and remodeling of homes should deal with lead paint hazards. To force EPA to issue the rules, Senator Obama threatened to block the confirmation of an EPA official and passed an amendment to stop EPA from delaying the rulemaking process. When the rules are eventually finalized, they will prevent 28,000 lead-related illnesses each year, resulting in an annual net economic benefit of more than $4 billion.

Lead is also present in many children's products. In 2003 and 2004, nearly 150 million pieces of toy jewelry were recalled because of toxic levels of lead. To address this problem, Senator Obama introduced the Lead-Free Toys Act (S. 2048) to require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban any children's product containing lead.

Senator Obama is also an original cosponsor of the Home Lead Safety Tax Credit Act (S. 2053), which would provide tax credits to property owners who eliminate or contain paint hazards in homes where low-income young children or women of child-bearing age live.

Great Lakes
The Great Lakes store one-fifth of the world's surface water, and Lake Michigan alone provides drinking water for an estimated six million residents in Illinois. The Great Lakes are also important for recreation, transportation, and economic development. To preserve this national treasure, Senator Obama has been a strong supporter of the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration and is a cosponsor of the Great Lakes Environmental Restoration Act (S. 508).

One of the greatest threats facing the Great Lakes is aquatic invasive species. Senator Obama was successful in ensuring that Illinois receives adequate federal funding to operate a barrier to prevent Asian carp from entering Lake Michigan and disrupting the balance of the lake's ecosystem.

Global Climate Change
In addition to protecting the quality of the air we breathe, Senator Obama believes the U.S. needs to do more to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change. He is a cosponsor of the Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act (S. 1151), which was introduced by Senators McCain and Lieberman.

More info: Senator Obama's speech to the Associated Press in April 2006 on climate change.

Mercury
In December 2005, the Chicago Tribune published an in-depth report on the extent of mercury contamination in the fish eaten by Americans. Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that can cause serious developmental problems in children, ranging from severe birth defects to mental retardation. As many as 630,000 children born annually in the U.S. are at risk of neurological problems related to mercury. In adults, mercury can cause major neurological problems affecting vision, motor skills, blood pressure and fertility.

Sampling conducted by the Tribune showed surprisingly high levels of mercury concentrations in freshwater and saltwater fish purchased in the Chicago area. The Tribune series also reported on how existing programs at the Food and Drug Administration and EPA have failed to adequately test and evaluate mercury levels in fish.

To address this problem, Senator Obama introduced two bills - the Mercury Market Minimization Act (S. 3627) and the Missing Mercury in Manufacturing Monitoring and Mitigation Act (S. 3631). These bills would significantly reduce the amount of mercury that is deposited in oceans, lakes, and rivers, which in turn would reduce the amount of mercury in fish.

Defense
With the nation facing unprecedented threats, our military needs to remain the world's best. We must adapt the Pentagon to face 21st century threats such as global terrorists and loose nuclear weapons in the former Soviet states. Senator Obama is working to ensure that the nation's defense capabilities are strong, agile, and prepared and that our troops are provided with the equipment they need.

Destroying Surplus and Unguarded Conventional Weapons
Small arms have caused four out of five casualties in recent conflicts. There are countless caches of older mortars, antipersonnel landmines, and other weapons spread across the globe. These caches are minimally secured and make attractive targets for terrorists. For instance, shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles have hit more than 40 civilian aircraft and killed more than 600 people since the 1970s. The U.S. government's current response to threats from conventional weapons stockpiles is underfunded and divided.

Senator Obama has partnered with Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Dick Lugar (R-IN) to address this looming security vulnerability. In 1991, Senator Lugar helped craft the sweeping Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program to enable the former Soviet Union to safeguard and dismantle its enormous stockpiles of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, related materials, and delivery systems. The program has deactivated or destroyed 6,760 nuclear warheads.

After visiting weapons stockpiles in Russia, Ukraine and Azerbaijan, Senators Lugar and Obama introduced S. 2566, which would expand the cooperative threat reduction concept to conventional weapons. The Lugar-Obama bill would energize the U.S. program against unsecured lightweight anti-aircraft missiles and other conventional weapons and would strengthen the ability of America's allies to detect and interdict illegal shipments of weapons and materials of mass destruction. Funding would be provided to eliminate unsecured conventional weapons and assist countries in improving their ability to detect and interdict materials and weapons of mass destruction.

Respect for the Nation's Armed Forces
American troops are serving admirably overseas. Senator Obama believes that we need to give them the resources they need when in combat, and the support and services they earned when they return home.

Military Funding
Since arriving in Washington in 2005, Senator Obama has been a strong supporter of defense funding. He has supported the annual Defense Department appropriations bills and supplemental appropriations bills that fund American troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Senator has also supported pay raises for the troops, efforts to improve military readiness, and the acquisition of new weapons systems.

Senator Obama backs efforts to expand TRICARE eligibility and reduce TRICARE premiums so that our nation's service members, Guard members, reservists, and their families can have improved access to health care.

Armored Vehicles
During consideration of the 2005 Defense Department authorization bill, Senator Obama voted to provide additional funding for add-on armor for military vehicles and for additional up-armored military vehicles to help keep our troops in combat safe. According to a report by the New York Times, roughly half of the Army's 20,000 Humvees are fitted with improvised shielding that leaves the underside unprotected, while only one in six Humvees used by the Marines is armored at the highest level of protection.

Health Care
Senator Obama successfully passed legislation in the Senate to force the Pentagon to work towards an efficient electronic medical records system that will help ensure better care for our nation's troops. It is Senator Obama's goal for each separating service member to receive a secure electronic copy of his or her military and medical records at the time of discharge to smooth the transition to the Department of Veterans' Affairs health care system.

Traumatic Brain Injury
As a member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, Senator Obama has been tracking the high incidence of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) among the veterans returning home from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. TBI is being called the signature injury of the Iraq war. Often caused by the shock wave of improvised explosive devices, TBI can result in permanent brain damage. In order to ensure that these returning heroes receive appropriate medical attention, Senator Obama passed legislation in the Senate that requires all soldiers to be assessed for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) after they return from deployments.

Protect Troops from Avian Flu
In 2005, Senator Obama passed legislation that would require the Department of Defense to issue a plan to protect our troops from an avian flu pandemic.

Seniors
As we transition to an increasingly global economy, many Americans are at risk of being left behind through no fault of their own. Among those most affected by these changes are senior citizens, many of whom are on fixed incomes. We need to modernize our social safety net to help senior citizens meet these new challenges, but we also must preserve those elements, such as Social Security and Medicare, that have enabled us to fulfill our moral commitments to our parents and grandparents.

Social Security
Social Security is more than just a retirement plan; it is also a program of social insurance. And it has been one of the most successful government programs in our nation’s history. Senator Obama has fought to prevent the privatization of Social Security, which provides a vital safety net to tens of millions of seniors and Americans with disabilities.

Prescription Drugs
The U.S. is the largest market for pharmaceuticals in the world, yet our seniors pay the highest prices for brand pharmaceuticals. The Medicare Part D Program was supposed to address this problem but instead created a “doughnut hole” which limits drug benefits for seniors with more than $2,250 in annual costs. (Senator Obama was not in the Senate in 2003 when Congress passed the Part D program but would have opposed it.) For many seniors, this is a particularly devastating example of "bait and switch." A truly meaningful prescription drug program should provide a benefit that seniors can understand and count on, and reduce the cost of these drugs. To help lower the cost of prescription drugs, Senator Obama has supported efforts to allow American seniors to purchase prescription drugs in Canada and bring them back to the U.S. He also has supported giving Medicare the ability to negotiate lower drug prices.

Veterans Benefits
Illinois has a large proportion of aging veterans. Unfortunately, Illinois ranked 50 out of 53 states and territories in disability benefits for at least 20 years. As a result of Senator Obama’s involvement, the VA has increased the number of claims reviewers in the Chicago office, providing for a speedier processing of claims. The VA has also increased training which will ensure more consistent decisions. He has worked with Senator Durbin to require the VA to provide veterans in six states, including Illinois, with notification of their rights to appeal any benefit decisions. As a result of these appeals, Illinois veterans are starting see larger benefit checks.

The Administration’s approach to handling veterans’ health care ignores the reality of rising demand on the VA, and it places additional burden on veterans. Three years ago, the Administration established a means test for VA health care eligibility, and it has banned hundreds of thousands of veterans – some who make as little as $30,000 a year – from enrolling in the system. That affects both older and younger veterans. Senator Obama has opposed these changes and has fought for greater funding for veterans’ health care.

Housing Assistance
President Bush has proposed a 25% reduction – $190 million – in the Section 202 senior housing program, which provides affordable housing to senior citizens in developments owned by nonprofit organizations. The Section 202 senior housing program allows seniors to live with dignity and self-determination. There are about 286,000 Section 202 units serving very low-income seniors across the county, and an additional 15,800 units serve low and moderate-income seniors. Senator Obama has supported greater funding for the Section 202 program. He has also worked with Senator Stabenow to increase funding for housing for grandparents raising their grandchildren.

Heating Assistance
Senator Obama has been a strong supporter of greater funds for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), which helps senior citizens in many Northern and Midwestern states pay their winter heating bills.

Food Assistance
About one in every five elderly Americans is at risk of hunger during the year. For that reason, Senator Obama has opposed President Bush’s proposal to cut food supports, such as the Commodity Supplemental Food Program, that sustain vulnerable families, children, and senior citizens.

Emergency Preparedness
In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Senator Obama introduced legislation to prevent another tragedy in which the poor and elderly are left behind during a natural disaster or terrorist attack. His proposal, which was included in the recent port security law, requires states and localities to have emergency evacuation plans in place that take into account the special needs of senior citizens.

Crime
Senator Obama is a strong proponent of tougher measures to fight crime, in particular the growing problem of methamphetamines, which has ravaged many communities in Illinois. He has also advocated providing more resources to local law enforcement officers.

Fighting the Spread of Methamphetamines
Senator Obama cosponsored the Combat Meth Act (S. 103) which provides more money for fighting methamphetamines, tightens up control on the sale of meth ingredients, and provides assistance to children of meth abusers. The legislation would limit access to cold medicines containing pseudoephedrine, the primary ingredient used to make methamphetamine. This bill passed the Senate on September 15, 2005, and was signed into law.

Senator Obama has supported greater funding to fight meth through the use of Byrne Justice Assistance Grants. The Byrne Grant program provides important funding to many local Illinois law enforcement groups. For example, the Southern Illinois Enforcement Group (SIEG), a meth taskforce that polices 31 Illinois counties, pays for 5 of its 12 agents through Byrne grants. During Senate consideration of the Department of Justice funding bill, Senator Obama cosponsored an amendment to raise Byrne funding to $900 million in 2006; the amendment passed the Senate.

Support for Local Law Enforcement
Senator Obama has been a strong supporter of efforts to increase funding and support for our local law enforcement. He supported the reauthorization of the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program in the 109th Congress (PL 109-162) and supports efforts to increase COPS funding. The COPS program provides local law enforcement funding for: (1) hiring and training law enforcement officers; (2) procuring equipment and support systems (3) paying officers to perform intelligence, anti-terror, or homeland security duties; and (4) developing new technologies, including interoperable communications and forensic technology. Since 1994, the COPS program has funded more than 5,800 additional police officers and sheriffs deputies in Illinois and over $45 million in crime fighting technology assistance.

Sex Offenders
Senator Obama cosponsored Dru's Law (S. 792) which creates a nationwide sex offender database and requires greater monitoring of sex offenders upon their release from prison. The bill passed the Senate on July 28, 2005.

He also cosponsored the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. This bill increases the penalties for sex crimes against children under the age of 12, and creates a national Internet site known as the National Sex Offender Public Registry. The bill will also provide grants to local law enforcement to assist in preventing and investigating sex crimes against minors.

Violence Against Women Act
Senator Obama cosponsored extension of Violence Against Women Act (S. 1197), which passed the Senate on October 4, 2005, and was signed into law. The Act provides increased funds to law enforcement to combat violence against women. It also establishes a sexual assault services program and provides grants for education programs to prevent domestic violence and encourage reporting of abuses.

Security for Federal Judges
After the horrific murder of an Illinois federal judge's mother and husband, Senator Obama and Senator Durbin worked together to beef up security at our federal courthouses. The Illinois senators secured $12 million to improve security for federal judges. Senator Obama also joined Senator Durbin in requesting a Government Accountability Office investigation into additional steps that can be taken to protect judges.

Greater Funding for Chicago
Senator Obama has voted in favor of distributing federal homeland security funds to states and cities most at risk of a terrorist attack. In 2006, Chicago obtained a $52.5 million grant for training and equipping emergency first responders, up 16% from the previous year's $45 million grant.

Immigration
Senator Obama shares the growing public concern about illegal immigration in the United States. The challenge facing President Bush and Congress is how to effectively stop the flow of illegal immigrants across our borders, better manage immigration flows going forward, and deal with illegal aliens who are already living and working in this country.

The Department of Homeland Security recognizes that identifying and deporting 11 million undocumented workers currently in this country would be both logistically impossible and highly disruptive to the American economy. Instead of mass deportations, Senator Obama believes that Congress must pass comprehensive, compassionate reform that reaffirms the rule of law and brings the undocumented population out of hiding.

The Senate Immigration Bill
Senator Obama played a key role in the crafting of the immigration reform bill that the Senate passed in May 2006. The bill, which President Bush supports, would provide more funds and technology for border security and prevent employers from skirting our laws by hiring illegal immigrants. The bill also would provide immigrants who are now contributing and responsible members of society an opportunity to remain in the country and earn citizenship. But not all illegal immigrants would be guaranteed the right to remain in the U.S. under this proposal; they would first have to pay a substantial fine and back taxes, learn English, satisfy a work requirement, and pass a criminal background check.

Senator Obama offered three amendments that were included in the Senate bill. The first amendment strengthens the requirement that a job be offered at a prevailing wage to American workers before it is offered to a guestworker. The second amendment makes it simple, but mandatory, for employers to verify that their employees are legally eligible to work in the United States. And the third amendment authorizes $3 million a year for the FBI to improve the speed and accuracy of the background checks required for immigrants seeking to become citizens.

A final consensus bill must now be negotiated to work out the differences between the House and Senate immigration bills. Senator Obama appreciates the serious ramifications of this issue – for American workers, Illinois communities, and immigrant families. He will continue to work with President Bush, his colleagues in Congress, and the citizens of Illinois to improve the effectiveness of our immigration laws and strengthen border security.


Chemical Plant Security
Illinois has at least 10 facilities where a large-scale chemical release could threaten more than a million people, and an additional 20 facilities where such a release could threaten more than 100,000 people. Despite this, there are currently no federal standards to require chemical plants to protect against terrorist attacks. While a number of plants have taken important voluntary steps to improve security, there are still major gaps, and there has never been a comprehensive security assessment of chemical plants across the country.

Senator Obama, working with Senator Lautenberg, introduced tough legislation to drastically improve security at our nation's chemical plants. The Chemical Safety and Security Act (S. 2486) would establish a clear set of federal regulations that all plants must follow. Plants that are considered a high risk to large population areas or critical infrastructure would face more stringent standards. The bill requires chemical facilities to take steps to enhance security, including improving barriers, containment, mitigation, and safety training, and, where possible, using safer technology, such as less toxic chemicals or safer procedures.

Transit Security
Senator Obama is deeply concerned about the safety of the millions of Americans who use our nation's public transportation systems everyday. Unfortunately, non-aviation security has been under-funded since the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, and our subways and buses remain vulnerable. Only days after the July 2005 bombings in London, England, Senator Obama cosponsored and voted for an amendment that would have increased rail and transit security by $1.2 billion. Although that amendment was defeated, Senator Obama remains committed to improving rail and transit security.

Disaster Response
In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, improving our nation's emergency planning and response capacity has become a priority for Senator Obama. He has introduced legislation to ensure that the mistakes witnessed before and after Katrina are not repeated in the future. Senator Obama's legislation includes provisions to establish a national family locator system for missing persons, a mobile corps of volunteer health professions, and mandatory planning for the emergency evacuation of people with special needs, including low-income individuals, the elderly, and the disabled.

Terrorism Risk Insurance
Senator Obama cosponsored the extension of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (which became Public Law 109-144). The Act provides important protections to real estate in large cities such as Chicago.

Nuclear Waste
Within the past five years, three nuclear power plants have reported missing spent fuel. Senator Obama introduced the Spent Nuclear Fuel Tracking and Accountability Act (S. 1194), which would establish specific and uniform guidelines for tracking, controlling, and accounting for individual spent fuel rods or segments at nuclear power plants, including procedures for conducting physical inventories. These provisions were included in S. 864, which passed the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee on June 8, 2005.

Drinking Water Security
Senator Obama drafted an amendment, which was included in the Safe Drinking Water Act, which passed the EPW Committee on July 20, 2005. The Obama amendment would provide $37.5 million over the next five years to protect the country's drinking water from a terrorist attack. It also instructs Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control to develop the tools needed by drinking water systems to detect and respond to the introduction of biological, chemical, and radiological contaminants by terrorists.

Education
Obama is committed to providing every American with the opportunity to receive a quality education, from pre-kindergarten to college or vocational school to job retraining programs.

Technology has created a quiet revolution by breaking down barriers and connecting the world's economies. Businesses have the ability to move jobs wherever there is an Internet connection. Countries like India and China start schooling their children earlier, keep them in school longer, and have a strategic emphasis on math, science, and technology. The importance of educating American children for the global economy was the subject of a commencement address that Senator Obama delivered in June 2005 at Knox College.

Senator Obama believes that we must do the same here in America. States and local school districts, as well as parents, teachers, and students must take the lead. The federal government must fund its mandates and assist in identifying and expanding the best programs.

However, there is no substitute for strong parental involvement. Because education begins at home, parents must set high standards and inspirational examples for their children. As a father, Senator Obama believes we need to find the time and the energy to help our kids love learning. Parents can read to their children, discuss what they read, and make time for this by turning off the TV.

Early Education
Head Start is the major Federal program supporting early education. In Illinois, Head Start provides tens of thousands of children with a safe learning environment, while encouraging parents to be involved in their children's education. Senator Obama believes that Congress must increase overall funding for the program, especially funding for Early Head Start and teacher education. He will also work to preserve the essential role of Head Start parents.

Primary & Secondary Education
Local public schools not only educate our students, they often provide a focus for community activity. Local school districts often serve as laboratories for innovation in education, but too often this innovation remains localized. Although the federal role in education is limited, one way the federal government can make the most of its scarce resources is by fostering innovation - identifying the best programs and practices, and helping expand them around the country.

Senator Obama has introduced the Innovation Districts for School Improvement Act (S. 2441). Under this initiative, school districts would submit plans on how they would become centers of reform. Twenty districts nationwide would be selected based on the best plans to increase achievement for all students and put effective teachers in all classrooms. These districts would receive substantial federal resources but would be required to implement systemic reforms and show convincing results.

Differences in learning opportunities during the summer contribute to the achievement gaps that separate struggling poor and minority students from their middle-class peers. Senator Obama introduced the Summer Term Education Programs for Upward Progress Act (STEP UP) (S. 2149) to address the achievement gaps among schoolchildren in the early grades. STEP UP establishes a grant program to support summer learning opportunities to be offered by local schools or community organizations.

Post-Secondary Education
Senator Obama believes that every high school graduate should have the opportunity to go to college or vocational school. Student loans provide critical financial aid for many Americans. Not long ago, financial aid was primarily in the form of grants. Unfortunately, this is no longer the case. Graduates now have more and more difficulty keeping up with loan payments. At a minimum, our government has the responsibility to ensure that the most affordable and sensible loans are available to our students. But government and students are not the only ones who need to act. Tuition costs have been rising at an average rate of 8% per year, well above the overall rate of inflation. Colleges and universities must also do their part to rein in costs and pass those savings on to students.

To address this problem, Barack Obama's first bill as a U.S. Senator was the HOPE Act (Higher Education Opportunity Through Pell Grant Expansion Act) (S.697), which would help make college more affordable for many Americans. The bill would increase the maximum Pell Grant from the current limit of $4,050 to a new maximum of $5,100.

Veterans
As a member of the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, Senator Obama is committed to helping the heroes who defend our nation today and the veterans who fought in years past.

Benefits Disparities
Following reports in December 2004 that Illinois veterans have for decades ranked nearly last in average disability pay received, Senator Obama led efforts to uncover the reasons for this disparity and to correct it. As a result of this pressure, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) opened an investigation into the matter, agreed to hire a dozen new claims specialists for the Chicago regional office, and agreed to re-examine the claims of Illinois veterans who felt they have been treated unfairly. Senators Obama and Durbin introduced an amendment that became law requiring the VA to notify Illinois veterans about their right to seek a review of their past claims. The resulting outreach to Illinois veterans in the summer of 2006, led to an increase in the number of Illinois veterans getting the benefits and services they deserve.

Greater Funding for Veterans Health Care
As early as February 2005, Senator Obama warned of a shortfall in the VA budget. Four months later, the VA reported that in fact it had more than a $1 billion shortfall. Senator Obama cosponsored a bill that led to a $1.5 billion increase in veterans' medical care. During the debate on the Fiscal Year 2007 budget, Senator Obama cosponsored measures that would have provided additional funding increases for veterans.

In September 2006, Senator Obama introduced the Lane Evans Veterans Health and Benefits Improvement Act (S. 3988) to improve the VA’s planning process to avoid budget shortfalls in the future. The bill requires the VA and the Department of Defense to work together and share data so that we know precisely how many troops will be returning home and entering the VA system.

Homeless Veterans
Every year, 400,000 veterans across the country, including an estimated 38,000 in Chicago, spend some time living on the streets. Senator Obama has been a leader in fighting homelessness among veterans. He authored the Sheltering All Veterans Everywhere Act (SAVE Act) (S. 1180) to strengthen and expand federal homeless veteran programs that serve over 100,000 homeless veterans annually. During the debate on the Fiscal Year 2007 budget, Senator Obama passed an amendment to increase funding for homeless veterans programs by $40 million. These funds would benefit programs that provide food, clothing, mental health and substance abuse counseling, and employment and housing assistance to homeless veterans.

In June 2006, Senator Obama introduced the Homes for Heroes Act (S. 3475), which would expand access to long-term affordable housing for homeless veterans by setting aside $225 million to purchase, build or rehabilitate homes and apartments for veterans. The legislation would also greatly expand existing veterans rental assistance programs and create a new office within the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to coordinate services to homeless veterans.

Food for Recovering Soldiers
Senator Obama introduced an amendment that became law providing food services to wounded veterans receiving physical therapy or rehabilitation services at military hospitals. Previously, service members receiving physical therapy or rehabilitation services in a medical hospital for more than 90 days were required to pay for their meals.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and TBI
Senator Obama fought a VA proposal that would have required a reexamination of all PTSD cases in which full benefits were granted. He and Senator Durbin passed an amendment that has become law preventing the VA from conducting a review of cases, without first providing Congress with a complete report regarding the implementation of such review. In November 2005, the VA announced that it was abandoning its planned review.

Senator Obama passed an amendment to ensure that all service members returning from Iraq are properly screened for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). TBI is being called the signature injury of the Iraq war. The blast from improvised explosive devices can jar the brain, causing bruising or permanent damage. Concussions can have huge health effects including slowed thinking, headaches, memory loss, sleep disturbance, attention and concentration deficits, and irritability.

Easing the Transition to the VA
Senator Obama passed an amendment that became law requiring the Department of Defense (DOD) to report to Congress on the delayed development of an electronic medical records system compatible with the VA's electronic medical records system. DOD's delay in developing such a system has created obstacles for service members transitioning into the VA health care system.

In September 2006, Senator Obama introduced the Lane Evans Veterans Health and Benefits Improvement Act (S. 3988) which would help veterans transition from the DOD health system to the VA system by extending the window in which new veterans can get mental health care from two years to five years. The Lane Evans bill also would improve transition services for members of the National Guard and Reserves.

http://obama.senate.gov/issues /

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. Wow!
Thanks!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
75. Obama cannot match Hillary when it comes to experience
and Congressional longevity. Consider Hillary's major accomplishments:

1. Voted for PATRIOT Act, no questions asked.

2. Voted for Iraq War Resolution, no questions asked.

3. Kept silent about news reports of torture at Guantanamo.

4. Still "evolving" (her words) on full equal rights for gays and lesbians.

5. Opposed John Kerry on the Alito filibuster.

6. Bad-mouthed John Murtha's call for troop withdrawals.

7. Opposed Kerry/Feingold troop withdrawal resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #36
85. Very Impressive!!!
This man reminds me of the late and beloved Paul Wellstone - a lot! He seems to have heart coupled with intellect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
athena Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
65. If you're trying to learn about him, read his book.
He wrote the first one, Dreams from My Father, long before he went into politics. It's a beautifully-written book.

By the way, Obama himself makes fun of the hype. Watch these videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-qLDWQQmmo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2HVck0TV_g&mode=related&search=
(The jokes and comments about hype come near the end, in each case.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
86. He is not doing the hype, the MSM is doing it


So you are letting the MSM do your selections?

Hope you will take a look at him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
23. his voting record is nothing special
personally i think he comes off as a little too smooth and greasy- i really hope he is not the nominee because he would get trounced at the big one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Which vote do you have a problem with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
52. He is NOT greasy at all or too smooth
he pretty low key and soft spoken.

I prefer another candidate - but that is a strange impression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. It's difficult listening to him speak...
When he's not giving 8 second soundbites, he *seemingly* says "uh" before every sentence. That's not something to determine one's vote by alone, but it certainly factors into debate considerations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. I've seen that sometimes but not others - so it may be nervousness
I don't think I saw it at the SRFC hearing - which as a Kerry supporter I've watched online since 2005.

That's the opposite of smooth and greasy though - from the person I was responding to - not you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. He pauses sometimes before he speaks
to think about the question. What a strange thing for a politician to do.

I listened to Obama speak quite a bit in 2004, and I never had problems listening to him. And although I volunteered at his office in my part of the country, I did not always agree with him. When he came there to campaign, I would confront him on what I did not agree with, and he would stop, think and then address my question either in an answer or by taking part in a discussion. Now I am a peon in the realm of things, and he did not have to address me at all, but he did.

I am not pushing him for a presidential candidate, but if no one else enters the race, he has my vote. And only if one of two other people enter the race would I even consider voting for someone else besides him. And if one of these people enter, I would want him for VP. I trust Obama. I don't always agree with him, but I trust him. He openly thinks about things. I want someone who thinks!!! I like people who think!!! I don't want someone who just goes by what he knows or has been told. I want people in power who think about their actions. No one is perfect, and I don't expect someone to be, but I do want someone who is approachable and is able to contemplate that things are not always as they see them or want them to be.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #64
78. He pauses sometimes before he speaks? -Bush doesn't, he uses a teleprompter
Obama answers any topic with a script, the debates will serve him well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #78
84. I agree
I think he will do well in debates because he is intelligent. He listens to what the other person says and speaks to it.

If you want to know something funny about my conversations with Obama. I sort of insulted him one time because I thought he was too young to know who Basil Rathbone was. (Barack was born in 1961 and Basil died in 1967.) Barack was forty-three in 2004, but at fifty-nine, anyone in their early forties seemed very young. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. What the Hell are you talking about? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glide625 Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I'm talking about
the obvious point that being Black he deserves to be elected but the racists will find subtle arguments to vote against him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. Sad but true nt
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 01:57 PM by bearfan454
Welcome to DU. Now you can get the real news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
55. Clearly ignorant to say everyone who votes against him is racist.
Whether in the primary or general election. But you go ahead and have your oblivion. I hope you enjoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentblack Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
63. Good try...
...that it such a lame statement. It almost rises to the level of trolling....


I live in Maryland and voted for Ben Cardin over Michael Steele (a black man)...does that make me racist? In the 88 Primary, I voted for Paul Tsongas even though Jesse Jackson was on the ticket - am I racist?

Will some people (in both parties - yes, Virginia there are racist Democrats) not vote for him because he is black? Of Course. But the majority who do not vote for him will be because he is very new and they have other loyalties - I will not give up on Kerry just something flashier came along.


Keep the knee jerk, stereotype crap somewhere else...people are trying to think here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
72. Go play
somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GlenP Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
83. Wrong

I'm not a racist and I'LL be voting against him, even though HE IS very likely the best person in the current lot to be president.

I'll be voting against him because he CAN NOT and WILL NOT win in a general election in this country. Period.

If he is the nominee, I will campaign for him and vote for him (as futile as that will be), but he will lose (not only to the racist independent vote, but also to the hardcore republican vote, 99.9% who will come out to vote in that match-up).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stratomagi Donating Member (811 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
34. Exciting! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. Did y'all get the email?
I did. :loveya: Barack!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
38. Watch out Hillary! Obama's in the house
He will run, and will be front runner. May the best candidate win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
69. Obama brings a fresh face to the race
I haven't seen the video yet. How is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #38
76. Tell Momma that I'm for Obama
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. Great! I really like him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
44. Obama brings something special to the table: hope. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
48. A sober question...
Part of the equation for a good President is having the right positions on issues, which I'm withholding judgement on at this point until I have a chance to do a thorough review. But the equation also calls for the necessary managerial skills to implement those positions. What experience does Senator Obama have that will allow him to successfully undertake the Executive responsiblities of the Presidency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
53. I think he's too early. But I hope wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
54. great timing - shows real political savvy
He let the speculation grow on its own without announcing - then the day after MLK day he quietly forms exploratory committee- no big event to announce just let it spin itself. this on the day after most americans are feeling and thinking more about progress and racial equality than on any other day. He gets to still be underdog to Hilary's unnanounced run as the speculation continues to mount for her and plants a seed in the minds of enough people that this might finally be the time when skin color won't matter in the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GlenP Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #54
82. LOL

LOL. You wish. Not only will skin color / race matter to the most likely voters who will come out in massive MASSIVE droves to vote against Obama, but there will be MILLIONS who will base their entire vote decission to be against Mr. Saddam HUSSEIN OBAMA Bin Laden!

Get friken real.... Barrack (who would probably make an excellent president) has not got a snowball's chance in hell of being elected president in the U S of A.

If the most likely primary voters do select Obama, then we may as well just hand the presidency to the Repugnicans right now and not put us through the pain and trouble of an election.

I will NOT be voting for the best Democratic candidate and presidential candidate. I'll be voting for someone who can actually win in the general election. And if anyone thinks the American people will vote for the Best candidate in the general election then they've been in a coma the last 6 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #82
88. because voting for the most electable worked so well in 200 and 2004
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 11:20 PM by daveskilt
so we try finding the handsome white man with no strong opinions in 08 ? thats like lord kitchner thinking the hun would be surprised the 27th time they rushed the trenches at dawn.

you may be right. but I will be voting for the best candidate (whoever that turns out to be) not the electable pre-chewed mess who will get the nomination and then get eviscerated. it is safe for the repubs and the media to go after kerry or gore or edwards or dean - but they don't risk going after the black man in case they get called racist.

the southern strategy works against a white man they can paint as a Nlover but not against the black man - those who turn out to vote against him based on skin color were not going to turn out to vote democratic anyway. As I had dinner with some lifelong republicn friends this weekend - they said the only way they would vote dem is if obama is the candidate - there is a pickup to be had for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #82
90. That's right. Fuck the best candidate.
We need to choose the worst one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aein Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #82
91. does anybody else get the impression that this guy is an idiot? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
60. Go-Bama!
Im sick of hearing about the candidate that seems like the are electable... how about one that will DO something?!

What happened to Kerry's electability? How about McCain?

I think Obama will talk himself into a very electable position. With brain, class, and ablity.

These are foriegn concepts in american politics for sure. Lets try it!?


I dare say there are more anti-Hillary votes than racists anyway....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
67. I am happy and jazzed
this is great news!!!! He is just what we need in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #67
94. With Obama you can kiss '08 goodbye! Not enough experience!
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 03:10 PM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citygal Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
71. I keep hearing the race card as a downside,
that no one will vote for him because he is African American. I disagree. This past November Harold Ford, Jr. made a solid challenge to the Republican candidate and almost won. And it was in Tennessee - the DEEP South. I think race will be less of an issue with most voters than many on here think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #71
93. They won't vote for him because he's got NO experience! Say Bye Bye to 2008
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 03:09 PM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
73. great orator - where is his management experience in government?
too new to senate -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dean Martin Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
77. Well....
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 09:00 PM by Dean Martin
I'm in the middle of Obama's first book. Yes, he is a wonderful writer. While I've stated I don't like the liquified coal deal, I still really like Obama. I'll vote for him over any Republican, but I'd prefer someone stronger on the environment like Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
79. It's good DUer's aren't sweating Obama -- Hillary sure is, and she's been talking to Bill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slj0101 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
87. His middle name is Hussein, He's biracial.
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 10:52 PM by slj0101
But he's eloquent, intelligent, and I like what he stands for. I'm voting for him in the primary and if he gets the nom, regardless of his race and name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC