Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

14 U.S. Attorneys Never Officially Nominated by President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 12:34 PM
Original message
14 U.S. Attorneys Never Officially Nominated by President

Here's a nice piece that looks thoroughly at who's currently serving as attorneys that haven't been "officially" nominated and under the new Patriot Act, are defacto "permanent" entries as attorneys. It seems like every time we see an article on this subject, the number and scope of this problem is growing. This has really been a stealth program I think that's been going on for some time. As the article notes, now that it is on many people's radar screens, how they will be nominating those to replace those latest entries caught in this "purge".

From:
http://scoop.epluribusmedia.org/story/2007/2/14/113121/438

14 U.S. Attorneys Never Officially Nominated by President
by ePluribus Media
Wed Feb 14, 2007 at 11:31:21 AM EST
Without the "official" nomination, of course, the attorney serving in the capacity of U.S. Attorney in charge of a district is never sent to the Senate for vetting and confirmation.

A collaborative piece by Roxy, AvaHome, cho and standingup
Contributions by:Rayne Today, JeninRI, wanderindiana, Greyhawk, intranets, Duke1676, ConnecticutMan1, Zan, Biblio, clammyc, Aaron Barlow. On Kos: DC Pol Sci, Marketrustee, MacDust, carolita, lapin -- Let us know if we left anyone out.

On February 15th, 2007, keep your eyes peeled on the U.S. Attorney Carol Lam's seat in the California Southern district to see whom Attorney General Alberto Gonzales names as U.S. Attorney to step in until the "official" presidential appointment is made. After that, don't relax too much, because on February 28th, another of the Gonzales Seven, Daniel Bogden, will be stepping down. So far, there's been no announcement of recommendations for his replacement. It will be intriguing to see who fills the spot, even temporarily.

No matter who they are, these two replacements will join a list of 14 who, although serving as their districts' U.S. Attorneys in an official, acting or interim capacity, have not been confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

14 U.S. Attorneys Serving without being Presidentially Appointed*

* ALASKA - Nelson P. Cohen
* ARIZONA - Daniel G. Knauss
* ARKANSAS, EASTERN - Tim Griffin
* CALIFORNIA, CENTRAL - George S. Cardona
* DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - Jeffrey A. Taylor
* ILLINOIS, SOUTHERN - Randy G. Massey
* IOWA, NORTHERN - Matt M. Dummermuth
* MAINE - Paula D. Silsby
* MISSOURI, WESTERN - Bradley J. Schlozman
* NEBRASKA - Joe W. Stecher
* TENNESSEE, EASTERN - James R. Dedrick
* TENNESSEE, MIDDLE Craig S. Morford
* WASHINGTON, WESTERN - Jeffrey C. Sullivan
* WEST VIRGINIA, SOUTHERN - Charles T. Miller

* compiled from the Department of Justice's list of U.S. Attorneys

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. The one what worries me is Rove's friend in Arkansas
I just know Whitewater and the Rose Law Firm will be hitting the news again :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green Mountain Dem Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if...
they all know that in Nov 2008 they will all be FIRED!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. How might their very presence prevent that from happening?
I fear we are seeing the completion of a slow-motion coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. exactly. Their investigations are getting turned off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seems as if those are pretty much all purple to green. No bright red
in there anywhere. Coincidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I have no idea what that means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sorry, purple to blue. That should make a bit more sense...
(red + blue = purple).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC