Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some mull idea of Sen. Bill Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:03 AM
Original message
Some mull idea of Sen. Bill Clinton
If Hillary Rodham Clinton wins the presidency, some top Democrats would like to see her husband, former President Bill Clinton, appointed to serve out Hillary’s unexpired Senate term.

“As a senator, he’d be a knockout,” said Harold Ickes, who was once a top White House aide to Bill Clinton and now gives behind-the-scenes advice to Hillary. “He knows issues, he loves public policy and he’s a good politician.”

Some Democrats and political analysts say Bill Clinton would thrive in the world’s greatest deliberative body, much like Lyndon Johnson did before he became president.

“President Clinton would excel in the Senate,” said Paul Begala, who helped Bill Clinton get elected and served in the White House as a top aide.

More...


Interesting times, folks. Interesting times. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. so we'd end up with presidents Bill, Hill, Bill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. he could run for president again and despite his faults and policy short-comings, win again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, he couldn't. The two-term limit isn't sequential, it's total. NT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. i just meant people would vote for him again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes. Indeed.
I would love the Clintons in the WH! Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm thinking Secretary of State in ANY Dem administration
Want to start to repair Republicon damage to America's image?

Can you give me a better choice?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Any internationally visible position
Edited on Mon Feb-19-07 06:39 AM by BadgerKid
would be great since he seemed to be well-liked abroad. Sec. State, UN Ambassador,etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnyieldingHierophant Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. I agree, I think SoS would be a much more desirable position for him*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. That's where I've been saying I'd like to see him
SOS or Ambassador to the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is New York the Clintons' private fiefdom?
Let's keep Hillary in the Senate, where she belongs, and let the next Democratic President appoint Bill Clinton Ambassador Plenipotentiary for the Middle East, his mission to bring about peace to that troubled area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. This is a stupid idea
Progressives are not supposed to be for hereditary positions and I think that this is what all the clamor for everything "Clinton" seem to be aiming for. If Clinton wants, he could start training program to pass some of those political knack of his to other "mini-clintons" in the progressive world and help make the progressive movement stronger and more agile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I don't see why people are so obsessed with the name.
I can't imagine anyone else in the world more qualified to fill that seat than William Jefferson Clinton. That being said, I'm sure there are a lot of NY democrats who could serve in the senate admirably and make their state and the nation proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. IF Hillary were to win the presidency (highly unlikely, imo), that seat will likely go to . . .
Bobby Kennedy (who has expressed an interest) . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. If both Kennedy and Clinton expressed interest
I think the wishes of the former POTUS and POTUS elect would take precedent in Spitzer's mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Either he or the Big Dawg would do a fine job
The people of New York could be proud of either one of them. I think it's a moot point, though. I don't think we're going to see a President Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
12.  We have policy differences with BIll
Like the destruction following Nafta and the Telecommunications Bill. Yet, we somehow respect BIll more than Hillary.
I'd like to see him in the Senate. Can you imagine the likes of wingnuts such as Oklahoma's wingnuts senator having to sit in committee with Bill. I'd love it. I suspect Bill has learned from his presidential mistakes. ( He did his best to prevent the Bankruptacy bill after all, unlike Hillary.) I suspect overall his voting record might be better than Hillarys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. A younger Daniel Patrick Moynihan would be better
Senator Clinton's predecessor was 49 when elected senator in '76. He went on to server three terms before retiring in '00.

Spitzer should look for someone in their early '40s who can server with distinction, hold the seat for four terms, and build the kind of clout that senior senators acquire.

New York deserves effective representation in Washington, not celebrity senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. I'd much rather see him take up a more international role
Under Hillary, he'd have a greater opportunity to work on world matters. IMO, he's beyond just the US now. He has a responsibility to work for a greater/global change - and I would have liked to see him in a UN role. However, that too could have been limiting. If we place a "title" on him - it will limit him in any regard. It's one of the reasons why I admire what Gore has been doing for the past 5 years. He follows the problems, rushes to aid, gets his hands dirty - and isn't restrained by some expectation of what his current job role should or shouldn't be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I agree with most of what you say here, but I would like to see Gore become president
because of the magnitude of environmental problems now visible that threaten to unravel the web of life. Environmental problems are much worse than is being discussed publicly. Unlike most politicians Gore is uniquely capable of seeing the writing-on-the-wall patterns that show foundational life support systems are being dangerously undermined.

I'm not just talking about global warming here.

Gore is a holistic thinker... a necessary skill when looking at the environment and how different systems interact with each other. His analysis of global warming illustrates this ability to think laterally and holistically -- and so does his book "Earth in the Balance" that he wrote more than a decade ago. For example, Gore understands that the toxicities of widely used synthetic chemicals undermine health and life at the cellular level, and has concerns about their effects on entire systems. Gore understands that one sickened part of the web affects other systems. There is probably nobody in government today that realizes this as deeply as Gore does -- that all biological systems are critical to the survival of others. On an individual level Gore also knows that if you poison an organism, that it becomes weakened and more vulnerable to other stresses in the environment.

When we look at the massive devolution of whole regions of the ocean-- it is telling us that we are in deep, deep trouble. Although Gore has not spoken about this yet that I know of -- I think he of all people would understand how serious this threat is.

Although Gore plays an important role with what he is doing now - the impetus for change is still much too slow. Think of how much he could accomplish if he were able to get elected to the biggest bully pulpit of all! He is a supernerd when it comes to understanding and discussing these problems, with an unique ability to make the language of science accessible even to those who have no background in the topic. Think of it -- he has been a teacher for the past several years -- Gore would be able address these issues in a coherent way and do much more than he is able to accomplish as an independent activist.

It may seem strange to parallel Gore's holistic biological system thinking with the possibility that he holds holistic views of world cultures and political systems -- but I think it's perfectly valid to make that assumption. We need leaders who can see the need to develop more intricate systems of interacting with other countries, systems that interact with more precision, compassion and honesty than ever before. I suspect Gore would employ diplomacy as a priority strategy, with a high degree of contact and even intimacy with other cultures. If you think about it long enough it becomes clearer that this kind of intelligence and understanding -- is the only hope for moving humankind towards becoming civilized.

Anthropologists keep looking for the link between civilized man and the Anthropoid Ape -- but I think we've already found him. It's us!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Oh, I agree 100% and for more than just the environmental aspect
Gore is the only candidate I could say that today I stand behind 100%. I'm still bothered and undecided about our frontrunners at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. Let's wait until after the election is over.
We did this same thing figuring out who would be good in Kerry's Cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Team Hillary, it appears, is already vetting for cabinet secretaries
This is akin to a football team getting ready for the Super Bowl before their first pre-season game. If we thought Bush suffered from hubris, what about Team Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. Personally I already suffer Clinton fatigue -- I'm totally weary of
of their triangulating, nuanced double talk. And they're both too cozy with the Bushes and Ruppert and other powers that be. If we can't have Gore, let's at least go for Kucinich or Edwards or Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jahyarain Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. hmmm. better yet,
how about President Gore appoints Bill the next Secretary of State?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. We have 300 million people...let's try someone not named Clinton or Bush
A pox on both their houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. ill try someone named clinton
if it means not having to live with someone named bush, guilliani, mccain, gringrich or hunter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. The author of the article is RW journo hit man Bill Sammon.
He is trying to stir up anti Clinton feeling in the Republic base. I think Bill as a Senator is a great thought but my bet is that this article is just one more effort to create animosity among Leftists who are not as enthusiastic about Bill in Congress as I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. He has great experience.
I'm not so sure I'm against the idea, as long as he doesn't become a Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. The world community loves Bill and hates George with a passion.
Edited on Mon Feb-19-07 09:26 PM by MasonJar
Bill Clinton can take on any international job: Sec of State, UN Ambassador, etc. Bobby Kennedy should be in charge of the Dept of the Interior and Al Gore should be anything he wants. If Bobby prefers to be a senator more power to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC