Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Jersey Begins Offering Civil Unions to Gay Couples

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 10:05 AM
Original message
New Jersey Begins Offering Civil Unions to Gay Couples
Congratulations to our G & L brothers and sisters everywhere.

This is a major step forward toward that most cherished of American ideals: Liberty and Justice for All.

Next step: the "M" word, "marriage." :hug:

New Jersey Begins Offering Civil Unions to Gay Couples
Associated Press
February 19, 2007 6:37 a.m.

Hundreds of gay couples received the same legal protections as married couples early Monday when a law took effect to make New Jersey the third U.S. state to offer civil unions.

The civil unions -- which offer the legal benefits but not the title of marriage -- were granted automatically to the hundreds of gay New Jersey couples who have been joined in civil unions or married in other states or nations.

At least one couple held a ceremony at the first possible moment. Steven Goldstein and Daniel Gross reaffirmed their Vermont civil union shortly after midnight. They would have had the rights in New Jersey even without holding a midnight ceremony here.

State Sen. Loretta Weinberg, a prime sponsor of the civil unions law who hosted ceremonies for couples including Messrs. Goldstein and Gross in her office, called the day "a big giant step forward." A handful of town halls across the state also opened at 12:01 a.m. to accept civil union license applications from couples who had not been so joined previously. They must wait 72 hours before they can hold civil union ceremonies, and several plan to exchange vows early Thursday.

More:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Gay-Marriage-Partners.html

(Also: http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6425695,00.html )

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good for New Jersey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. GO JERSEY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. CUE THE VONAGE THEME!
Edited on Mon Feb-19-07 12:23 PM by rocknation
But this has to be taken care of at the federal level. You can't legally married in one state and not another.

P.S. I don't to start pumping my own gas, though.

:woohoo:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. YES!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good for Jersey, a question
Congratulations on being able to be civilly unioned! Great to get the same legal protections! Good start.

Question: In how many other states can you have civil unions/marriages done? I found this paragraph in article, but was wondering about any other ones.

"Forty-five states have legal or constitutional bans on same-sex marriages. Only Massachusetts allows gay couples to marry, while California offers domestic partnerships"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. CT has had CU's for a couple of years now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Vermont was first to offer civil unions as a step toward marriage fairness.
Edited on Mon Feb-19-07 01:34 PM by Zenlitened
Then Connecticut and now New Jersey.

And of course (note boastful* tone of a Bay State booster here) Massachusetts was the first U.S. state to extend the right to marry to same-sex couples. :)

From Wikipedia:

As used in the United States, the term civil union connotes a status similar to marriage for same-sex couples; domestic partnership, offered by some states and municipalities, generally connotes a lesser status with fewer benefits, though this may vary.

The first civil unions in the United States were enacted by the state of Vermont in 2000. The federal government does not recognize these unions, and under the U.S. Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) of 1996, other U.S. states are not obliged to recognize them. By the end of 2006, Connecticut and New Jersey had also enacted civil union laws; furthermore, California's domestic partnership law had been expanded to the point that it became practically a civil union law, too. The same might be said for domestic partnership in Maine.

Link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_union


Though other, entire countries are light-years ahead, it has to be noted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Makes me very proud!
I expect the rest of the north east to follow suit with civil unions shortly and then it won't be much of a leap to marriage. I have found that my teenagers generation are pretty nochalant about it all, in their minds it is just silly that gays can't marry ( and I agree) So I have huge hopes that the generation coming up will finally rid us of some of the last of the civil rights issues. As time goes on in Mass I believe more and more people are realizing it just really isn't a big deal.

Added boastful note: I live in the first town to have a legally married gay mayor. Woo go Attleboro, MA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. "The first town to have a legally married gay mayor."
:woohoo: Attleboro rocks!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Awesome. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. as a former Jersey girl I say
a good beginning! Love is love and one of the ways we protect those we love is to make sure the law is looking out for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. As a born-and-bred Jersey girl, I second that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. A step in the correct direction.
Bravo NJ!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good job Jersey. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Ginny Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. I love my state. NJ is a great place! We are making progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good for NJ
It is still illegal in Minnesota, but only by law and not amendment. Wisconsin on the other hand took a big step back last fall by making both illegal by amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. why are people permitting this outrage?
would they allow the government to call interracial weddings a 'special conjoining'? unless its a MARRIAGE certificate its pointless. and offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I disagree, I honestly do. I understand where you're coming from...
Edited on Mon Feb-19-07 08:22 PM by Zenlitened
... Marriage is the goal, nothing more, nothing less. I think we agree there.

But IMO this is an important step that has an immediate, real impact on the lives of real people. Not pointless at all.

And in terms of strategy, I think it's important to (if I may turn an old phrase on its head) declare victory... and keep on fighting.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. imo, the problem is it lets them STOP at this
'don't worry, this is just as good as marriage'

'you should be grateful for what we gave you'

- - - that sort of thing. politicians aren't going to take any more 'steps' now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Welcome to the club, NJ.
One at a time, they'll all go this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC