Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman Scolds Reid For 'War Lost' Remark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jmc247 Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 06:59 PM
Original message
Lieberman Scolds Reid For 'War Lost' Remark
Source: Hartford Courant

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman rebuked Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid on Friday, saying he strongly disagreed with Reid's assessment that the Iraq war is "lost."

"This is exactly the wrong time to question our strategy in Iraq," said Lieberman, "or that our new strategy has failed."

"The question now before us," Lieberman said, "is whether we respond to these terrorist attacks by running away, as al Qaeda hopes -- abandoning the future of Iraq, the Middle East and ultimately our own security to the very same people responsible for this week's atrocities -- or whether we stand united to fight them."

To Lieberman, the choice is clear. "We should provide General Petraeus and his troops with the time and the resources to succeed. We should not surrender in the face of barbarism." Gen. Davis Petraeus is the top U.S. commander in Iraq.

Read more: http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-lieberman-reid-0420,0,6919400.story?coll=hc-headlines-home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why pay attention to anything
Liarman says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. lieman is a whorin'warmonger and
needs to get his scrively ass to the front lines in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, when is NOT "exactly the wrong time"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. barbarity, you nitwit...barbarity
such was your barbarism

I slay me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am convinced that he carried secrets to Bush in 2000 ~
He is real scum to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. You know it is possible that he sold the Dems out...it is
becoming a more believable scenario every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. It's real to me that Joey is a traitor

and we can add James Carville to the list.

How Hillary can trust him and his evil wife is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. "OUR" new strategy?
WTF?

It has nothing to do with us Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. What terrorists, Joe?
Are the voices in your head telling you there are terrorists again? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Would love to read headline, "Reid kicks traitorous whore Lieberman in the ass."
Lieberman deserves a HUGE dose of karmic retribution.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. 2008 Joe
At that point we will have more seats in the Senate and you will be relegated to the corner. No committee to chair, 4 years left in the Senate. I doubt he will be able to bs the CT voters again. I keep seeing re-runs of the Lamont campaign ad of the car hitting the brick wall over and over again. 19 months of Holy Joe left, then he will have no black mail power left, no threat of joining the republican party will matter at that point. I am not sure which I am more excited about, Bush or Lieberman leaving
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bush's strategy has failed, Joe.
Edited on Sat Apr-21-07 08:02 PM by Jack Rabbit
Wake up and smell the coffee.

We all understand that you wanted it otherwise. It didn't work out that way.

Now deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. He is clueless... Too scared for his own good, . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Message to Holy Joe...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Lieberman = Grima Wormtongue
Reid needs to tell him "Keep your forked tongue behind your teeth!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveAmPatriot Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. They spelled "accomplishing" wrong
They spelled it "accompolishing"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Tell me Joe
when would the right time be for congress to perform their constitutional responsibilities?

Let me guess, when someone named Clinton is in the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. It is time Reid scolded back...
Democrats can not keep letting this guy slam them without being called out. Who cares if he leaves the party, he doesn't vote with us anyways and the committees are locked until after the 2008 elections when we will most likely pick up at least a couple seats anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. The Kissmobile.
Does anybody remember the Kiss Mobile? While Holy Joe was out campaigning for the senate seat, some very creative people created a "Float" Car with Luscious Lieberman kissing Bush.

As I was falling asleep last night, I thought about that statue & how funny it was. And LIE-berman's face when he saw it.

Joe, anything you say at this point is just.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. The Kiss mobile still exists and
it may be traveling to Maine to help drive Lieberman's friend, Sen. Sue Collins (R-ME), out of the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. This one?
Who could forget, such a classic moment.

I'm glad to hear it's still being used.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaStrega Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. dip shit
"... or that our new strategy has failed."

He's such a tool. I agree, get yer ass to the frontline, Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm willing to give Fighting Joementum the benefit of the doubt on this one
Edited on Sat Apr-21-07 08:49 PM by arewenotdemo
For the valor he exhibited in tackling those Yale law courses in the '60s.

A spokesperson told the Hartford Courant in 1994 that Lieberman received an educational deferment from the Vietnam War draft when he was an undergraduate and law student from 1960 to 1967. Upon graduating from Yale law school at 25, Lieberman qualified for a family deferment as he was already married and had one child.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Let's get real.
Lieberman has someone out there pushing his message to the media. Most likely Dan Gerstein. But at the end of the day, does he have any real cred? Does he have any real constituency in this?

Not really. Just a shell of a man, a shadow of what he once was. Sold out everything he ever professed to believe in, for the proverbial 13 pieces of silver.

In a way, he is to be pitied. Just not too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanusAscending Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. Chicken shit Joe !!
There was a very important annual dinner for Dem's here in Ct. Fri. night. Nancy Pelosi was the main speaker, and Senator Dodd was there as well. It was a fundraiser, and for a price you got to have your picture taken with the "big guns". In my invitation, it stated that Joe LIEberman was scheduled to attend. THAT was reason enough for me not to go. I told some members from our D.T.C. to spit in his eye for me, if per chance they got to meet him. He is a PARIAH to us. Guess what???? The little weasel didn't even show up!! He's afraid to show his face in a DEMOCRATIC crowd, as well he should be. He used the excuse that it was his Sabbath. Well, bullshit!! He didn't know that when he let them put his name on the invite? I'm sure many other people like me didn't attend because he was "supposed" to be there!!! I really wish Harry Reid would tell him to go "begot" himself, and take away his Committee Chairmanship. He is a "non-entity" to the Party!!!:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. well, Joe-------put on a Uniform and go fight em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
45. No Joe is A Viet Nam Draft Dodging Weasel
Like his master and handler, Richard (five deferments) Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-21-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. Who the hell is Joe Lieberman??? and why is he making those weird noises ????
Edited on Sat Apr-21-07 11:10 PM by BrklynLiberal
:crazy: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
28. Here we go again with words taken
out of context and reported wrong throughout the country. Here is exactly what Reid said:
"This war is lost, and that the surge is not accomplishing anything, as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq yesterday.
I was like the odd guy out yesterday at the White House, but I at least told him what he needed to hear, not what he wanted to hear. And more people have to start telling George Bush what he needs to hear, not what he wants to hear. I did that."

HERE IS WHAT THE MEDIA DID NOT REPORT FROM THE SAME SPEECH ----"My conscience is clear, because I believe the war, at this stage, can only be won diplomatically, politically, and economically."

In the subsequent Senate floor speech, Reid again said that the "war is lost" but reiterated his belief that there is a political solution to a stable and secure Iraq:

Mr. REID. Madam President, the White House has been telling America that Democrats are doing the wrong thing by calling for a change of course in Iraq. They say holding the Iraqi Government accountable is wrong. They say finding a political solution Iraq is wrong. They say redeploying troops out of a civil war is wrong. They have said even debating a strategy for changing course is dangerous, and many Senate Republicans have backed that up by blocking several of our attempts to debate this issue here on the Senate Floor.

Conditions in Iraq get worse by the day. Now we find ourselves policing another nation's civil war. We are less secure from the many threats to our national security than we were when the war began. **********As long as we follow the President's path in Iraq, the war is lost. But there is still a chance to change course and we must change course.********** No one wants us to succeed in the Middle East more than I do. But there must be a change of course. Our brave men and women overseas have passed every test with flying colors. They have earned our pride and our praise. More important, they deserve a strategy worthy of their sacrifice.

Yet, in reporting on Reid's statement that the Iraq war "is lost," most media outlets failed to provide the full context of his comments. In addition to the Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, the Associated Press, the following television news shows did not include the portion of Reid's statements in which he said that "the war, at this stage, can only be won diplomatically, politically, and economically"

AND THIS IS THE SHAME OF THIS SO CALLED LIBERAL MEDIA.....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. You're right. You're exactly right.
Edited on Sun Apr-22-07 09:10 AM by w4rma
Big media isn't reporting that aspect of the speech because it puts the onus on Bush to actually accomplish something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
29. Lieberman is a bloodthirsty lying sack of demon shit. Killing people isn't going to solve anything
and it's all the military can do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
30. No surprises from the Courant; they backed Lyin' Joe in the Democratic Primary
over challenger Ned Lamont.

They're just "stickin' wit' their boy." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. Joe! Listen up Joe. If we leave Iraq that will take the fun out of
Arabs killing Arabs in that country. As long as we are there they have a cause that is Great for Allah's sake. The Arabs are getting really good at blowing things up, just like the U.S. Talk about terrorist training camps, Iraq is much more effective than Afghanistan ever was. Osama is one happy man, things are working out swell for his cause.

You realize this is sarcasm, but there is a lot of truth in my observations. Ah, but Joe isn't listening to the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. Shut your mouth, blowhole Joe.
You never have anything constructive to say, you DINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
34. Lieberman doesn't have the best interests of our country at heart.
He has the best interests of another country at heart, IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Just curious - would you say the same thing about everyone else who supports the war?
Or is it only certain racial and ethnic groups who are to be suspected???

And how is the war benefitting ANY country? Destabilizing the Middle East is a danger to all in the region. The only people who benefit are those in Big Oil, reconstruction companies notably Halliburton, and those who enjoy the power of empire. Actually, even the latter don't really benefit from the mess; but they can't bear to admit defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Interesting question. I suspect all who favor aggressively the IW...
have their own interests at heart. In Lieberman's instance, I suspect it's because of his loyalty to Israeli interests; it is not secret that Israel is in favor of the IW and has wanted a bigger U.S. involvement in the Middle East in total. It suspects, with good reason, that the country of Israel is in danger of being attacked by any no. of Arab countries in the region.

Others have their own interests at heart...either Israel, or their oil stocks, or their stocks in Halliburton subsidiaries, or the no-bid contracts awarded to other companies, or the oil in Iraq.

A number of Jewish Americans feel a certain closeness to the country of Israel, referring to it occasionally as "my homeland," etc. Nothing wrong with this at all. I believe Lieberman has made it no secret that he feels this certain closeness with Israel. Not all Jewish people do, but I think he's made no secret of the fact that he is one who does.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Could it not be that some people think that American interests are served by hegemony in the Middle
East, and that the Iraq war will advance this?

I think they are absolutely WRONG to think this; but nonetheless some do

It is not at all clear, in any case, that Israeli interests are favoured by the war in Iraq. Instability in the region and increased risk of terrorism is a danger for Israel as well as everyone else. In fact, the Israeli population have been very divided on this war. A poll taken by Ha'aretz in early 2003 suggested that 46% of Israelis were opposed to an American invasion of Iraq, and 43% in favour. This hardly supports the idea that 'Israel' as a whole supported the war.

Suspecting people of 'looking after another country's interests' just because of their ethnicity is fraught with danger. And how does one explain the hawkishness of several non-Jewish, non-Israeli, supposedly 'socialist' British politicians, such as Blair, John Reid, David Blunkett, and a number of others?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. This has nothing to do with "Ethnic Groups" unless Leiberman feels that way...
This has to do with the interests of a foreign nation, one that panders to the support of certain Racial and Ethnic groups in this country.

If you took "ISRAEL" out of the sentence and inserted some other nation as running PAC's and not being listed as foreign agents, there would be hell to pay.

And I think anyone who thinks that our involvement in the middle east doesn't take heat off of Israel is kidding themselves. I can't even remember the last report of a suicide bombing in Tel Aviv or Haifa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
35. As if it wouldn't be true if Reid didn't say it!
Lieberman's idea seems to be 'don't talk about it and then it won't exist'. What an ostrich. Stupid warmongering idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
37. Further evidence that Reid got it right
If you don't have time to find out the details, just go with the opposite of whatever Lieberman says. 4 out of 5 dentists recommend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
38. Does anyone remember when holy Joe
Slammed Howard Dean for saying that the capture of Saddam was meaningless and wouldn't lead to peace in Iraq?

I think Holy Joe has it wrong..........again. The war IS lost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
39. Joe, Joe, Joe........ Using our young men in uniform for your personal interest
Is looking real bad on your resume to God in heaven!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
40. Just like
A broken clock can be relied upon to tell you what time it isn't

The words of Joe Lieberman can assure you what is not truth

And so go the days of our lives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
43. Lieberman Has 0 Credibility! Turncoat! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
44. Hey, LIEberman, you fucking REPUKE TROLL, fuck off!
you're no Democrat...

YOU'RE proven WRONG on the issues...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC