Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Asks High Court to Nix 'Speech-or-Debate' Ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 01:01 AM
Original message
U.S. Asks High Court to Nix 'Speech-or-Debate' Ruling
Source: Washington Post

Justice Dept. Says It Makes Lawmakers Invulnerable

By Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 21, 2007; Page A03

The Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court to overturn an appeals court decision limiting law enforcement searches of congressional offices, arguing that the sweep of the ruling last summer may kill ongoing public corruption investigations.

Acting Solicitor General Gregory G. Garre, in a petition filed this week, urged the high court to weigh in on how far the "speech or debate" clause of the Constitution goes in insulating members of Congress from legal action. In the meantime, he said, "investigations of corruption in the nation's capital and elsewhere will be seriously and perhaps fatally stymied."

The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was handed down in August in the case of Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.), whose office was searched in 2006 by FBI agents investigating possible bribery. A three-judge panel ruled that under the Constitution, the FBI is barred from "a location where legislative materials inevitably to be found," unless the member consents.

Justice Department lawyers called the ruling an "unprecedented expansion" of the speech-or-debate clause, which they said protects legislative acts but does not shield non-legislative materials that may show criminal activity. The appeals court found that FBI agents reviewed protected legislative records in the course of searching for criminal evidence ...

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/20/AR2007122002197.html



Jefferson to tell judge about interview
He felt he couldn't leave FBI meeting
Thursday, December 20, 2007
By Bill Walsh

ALEXANDRIA, VA. -- U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, D-New Orleans, is expected to take the witness stand today to challenge FBI agents' accounts that he was free to leave what turned into a damaging interview before a search of his home in 2005 as part of their public corruption probe.

It will be the first time the congressman will testify in the 2 1/2-year investigation that has cast him as the mastermind in a web of international bribery schemes and triggered a 16-count indictment against him in June. Jefferson has pleaded innocent.

Jefferson is expected to tell a U.S. District Court judge that he felt coerced into making statements to the agents that the government plans to use against him at trial in February ...

http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-2/11981330823090.xml&coll=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. NOW WE HAVE THE POLITICAL POLICE WANTING FREE HAND.
SOME HOW THIS STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candymarl Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
This is a very bad idea. What if a Senator or Congressperson is simply watching a floor speech or debate? Technically they are not debating or making a speech. Do we really want our Congress members, both houses, looking over their shoulders while trying to conduct the peoples' business? Do we want to see them dragged away while watching CSPAN? Is the Bush DOJ planning such a spectacle? I wouldn't put it past them. They're desperate to keep the WH and take back Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. The day the Supreme Court rules the Constitution
unconstitutional is the day the United States will cease to exist as a nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's some case law on speech and debate clause
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's the Justice Department.
What the hell do you expect? Mukasey is another Gonzo, just older.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Jefferson's defense - that he felt coerced to talk - is laughable.
A Congressman knows anything he says can, and will, be used against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. As the Bushies further prepare to cow and neuter Congress
I'd ask when enough is enough, but for a Bush, a Hitler, a Pinochet, we all know enough is enough when all enemies are cowed and silent, and power is fully unchecked by anything.

The Bushie Ministry of Justice functions, with exceptions to the rule decreasing in frequency daily, as an arm of the Bushie/Nazi party.

Nothing less and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC