Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Campaigning here, Clinton goes over Culinary’s head

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:02 AM
Original message
Campaigning here, Clinton goes over Culinary’s head
Source: Las Vegas Sun

Just beneath the smiles and the hugs and the flash of cameras, Sen. Hillary Clinton played in-your-face politics in a visit to Las Vegas on Thursday. A day after the 60,000-member Culinary Union endorsed Illinois Sen. Barack Obama for president, Clinton walked a northeast Las Vegas neighborhood heavy with Culinary workers and won the support of several. Her campaign’s message: The endorsement means nothing and Culinary members should follow their conscience and not the order of union Secretary-Treasurer D. Taylor. It was a political kick in the shins to Obama and the union, all delivered with the New York senator’s trademark wide grin.

Marhayra Bermudez, a Culinary member who works in the kitchen at Bally’s, said she’s ignoring the Obama endorsement and backing Clinton. Many of her co-workers are doing the same, she said. Clinton stopped at the home of Gilberto and Elizabeth Santana and their two young children. Elizabeth Santana is a housekeeper at Harrah’s who cleans 16 rooms during every eight-hour shift. She’s supporting the family because her husband was injured on the job and can’t work.

The event gave Clinton some pitch-perfect TV moments. Sitting on the Santana couch, looking concerned as Gilberto Santana explained the family’s financial difficulties, Clinton said, “If we don’t take care of our children, we don’t care of our future.” She was once on the board of directors for the Children’s Defense Fund. Clinton’s theme for the day, which she adroitly returned to repeatedly, was the economy and the foreclosure crisis that is causing significant hardship across the country, but especially in Las Vegas.

At a roundtable discussion at Lindo Michoacan, a popular Mexican restaurant, Clinton listened to the stories of local residents either hit by the crisis or trying to do something about it, and she laid out her agenda on the issue: Clinton is calling for a 90-day moratorium on foreclosures and a five-year mortgage rate freeze, both dependent on the voluntary cooperation of lenders. In the past, she has said if the financial industry opposed her measures, she would consider legislation to make the steps mandatory including giving legal protection to lenders that fear being sued by investors for renegotiating mortgages. Clinton supports a fund, estimated at $5 billion, to help existing state foreclosure programs.



Read more: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/jan/11/campaigning-here-clinton-goes-over-culinarys-head/



Nice, positive story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't understand
If a group endorses a candidate they are off limits to other candidates? That seems to be the "message" of this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Apparently the individual has to give up his right to chose who
he wants to win the nomination if an organization they belong to supports someone else.

Democracy in action.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The group didn't endorse Obama - just the group's leaders have.
Not every one follows the leader, thank goodness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. The officers endorse on behalf of all members.
But there isn't a requirement that the members support the endorsed candidate.

The members are free to campaign for and contribute to whoever they wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Polls and media pundits don't vote. People do. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. well said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. RECOUNT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good for Hillary to keep campaigning and good for....
people to vote their own choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. I've been impressed -- and heartened -- how well HRC's going with blue collar women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. There was data on how women voted in
Iowa and in New Hampshire.

Most Iowa women voted Obama while most New Hampshire women voted Hillary.

Do you think there may be a gender gap in the African American vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. A few sentences picked from this story have been posted on DU and spun into a smear attempt.
DU never changes... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. It is a bit rediculous.
I would expect Obama and Edwards to do the same thing...It is called a CAMPAIGN.

Any candidate that let every member of a union go just because of a public endorsement is a dumb candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm not supporting the endorsed gubernatorial candidate of our regional leader.
At least nationally they made a better decision not to endorse a presidential candidate at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. And I would expect my NEA would endorse Clinton, but I am
backing Obama no matter what. I don't even know why endorsements by unions are considered a big deal. It seems like so many are frustrated by their union leadership an endorsement could actually be counter-productive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. It is the process that they used to endorse here
It did not even involve local union leaders. It was decided by a former regional leader who doesn't even live in the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC