Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US found date-stamped Iranian weapons in Iraq: report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:22 AM
Original message
US found date-stamped Iranian weapons in Iraq: report
Source: AFP

NEW YORK (AFP) - The US military says it has found Iranian-made mortars, rockets and explosives in Iraq bearing recent date stamps, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.

"You can see the manufacturing dates right on the armaments themselves," a senior commander in Baghdad was quoted as saying. "These are very clearly weapons that were made in the last month or so."

Iran denies supplying ammunition to Iraqi militants, or training them.

Earlier this week, a US general in Iraq said that the increasingly sophisticated attacks carried out by Shiite extremists were evidence that they were getting extra aid from Iranian groups in the country.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080425/wl_mideast_afp/usiraqunrestiranweapons_080425110848;_ylt=Ak17WsNTkgi5A_zyKev6aMpX6GMA



we need a war drum emoticon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why the hell would they date-stamp weapons?
Hell, everyone knows that you post-date a check when you want to create the illusion that you paid your bill earlier than you really did!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. LOL.... b/c it's a QC issue
find out who has been shirking on the assy line if a batch of duds fails to go off or worse
maybe some on site inspections

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IS6EuDa5-bs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVrWO4MQWZE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYTT5Uooht0&feature=related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Time to Obliterate!
:puke: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Probably in English too! - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Compared to how many date-stamped US-made weapons?
Any "secret anti-IED" stuff, for example???

:rofl:

Keep on catapulting that "Iran supplies weapons to Iraq" propaganda, bUsh! The stupidest MFers in America will blindly swallow it up, as always!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh not this old story again.
They tried to do the same thing a few years ago. Seems they didn't realize Iran uses a different calendar system and the dates on the supposed weapons were in US calendar notations. I wonder if this is more of the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darue Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. so it's "black market" then. not hard to believe some iranian hardware goes missing
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 07:35 AM by darue
heck, we've got sensitive secret military hardware for sale on eBay the GAO reports....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wait until they find the signed receipt.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Was it a "good until" stamp
or a "born on" stamp

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. rolling out the new product line earlier with each new war model, aren't they?


It's just that I can't get that one quote from Chief of Staff Andrew Card out of my head, the one where's he talking about selling the voters on the administration's Iraq policy: "From a marketing point of view, you don't introduce new products in August."

But when I read the U.N. speech, it was also fairly persuasive. (And when I read Vice President Tony Blair's dossier, I was further impressed.) It's just that I can't get that one quote from Chief of Staff Andrew Card out of my head, the one where's he talking about selling the voters on the administration's Iraq policy: "From a marketing point of view, you don't introduce new products in August."

(Note: In earlier editions of this column, I inaccurately quoted Mr. Card. I quoted him as saying, "From an advertising point of view, you don't launch a new product line until after Labor Day." The incorrect version of the quote was in a transcript of Mr. Gore's speech on Iraq. I apologize for the serious mistake, which was entirely my fault.)

War as "product line." The Founders would be so proud. Lincoln too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. WTF?!?! Iran may be involved with military and political groups within Iraq?!?!
No way, man!!!!

:sarcasm:

Shocking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. deja-vu.
They tried this last year. I guess they figured we wouldn't remember..

February 28, 2007
But skepticism abounds about the origin of the weapons, with critics wondering why those alleged to have been made in Iran had markings in English, not Farsi. And Monday, the New York Times printed a letter from an Iranian diplomat who said dates on some of the weapons shown - including a warhead marked 5-31-2006 - prove the U.S. claims are "preposterous."

"The dates are in the American date format - month first, day second - whereas the rest of the world does not use this format," wrote M.A. Mohammadi, press secretary for Iran's U.N. mission. Iran and most other countries put the day first, followed by month and year.

Judging from photos on the Web site of Defense Industries Organization, which makes weapons for sale as well as for the country's own defense, Iran does use English lettering - such as HE for "high explosives" - on at least some weapons in accord with international standards. However, none of the weapons shown on the company's site appear to be dated.

There are also visible differences between 81mm mortar shells known to be made by Iran and those displayed Feb. 11 by the U.S. military at a Baghdad briefing. The Iranian mortar shell has four horizontal ribs below the lettering and no date; the one shown in Baghdad has three ribs above the lettering and the date 3-2006.

http://www.sptimes.com/2007/02/28/Worldandnation/Gray_weapons_market_c.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cain_7777 Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. All the weapons coming from Saudi are American made and blend in with our military's spent weaponry
Not a word about Saudi insurgents or funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
38. Yep, that could've been proved easily, long ago
...if anyone in this crack-smoking administration cared to look. Too bad they don't mind if our Saudi friends are arming the Iraqi Sunnis, and those weapons have doubtless been used to injure/kill our troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. not only history repeats itself, the reasons for invasion do too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. "must eat before March of 20012". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boilinmad Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sorry, American arms dealers....
....You cant have ALL the customers in the world !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. The weapons could have come from American arms dealers
It's not like they are going to honor sanctions against Iran or other countries.

The weapons could have come from Iran via Syria passed on to Lebanon and then sold to anyone who then delivered them to Iraq fighters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
43. Or anywhere.
There could be countless arms dealers in the Middle East and elsewhere who may be buying up weapons wherever they can get them and unloading them in Iraq for a PROFIT. Third parties, black market, you name it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. To remind any who need reminding, there is a difference between the gvt of Iran, and Iranian people.
Not that DUers need reminding, but there probably are Iranian weapons in Iraq. Bought by Iraqis from someone in Iran. This is a big difference from The Gvt of Iran supplying Iraq with weaponry though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. HERE IS THE ACTUAL DATE STAMP PHOTO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. Dates way back to the Iran-Contra years. /nt
Cheney wants that oil at any cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rammy Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. Here We Go US finds *new* Iranian weapons in Iraq
Source: Wallstreet Journal

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. military says it has found caches of newly made Iranian weapons in Iraq, leading senior officials to conclude Tehran is continuing to funnel armaments into Iraq despite its pledges to the contrary.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120908648760443713.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us



Just as most people have feared, evidence is surely being planted to start an occupation of Iran!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
21.  they have their own military..
with modern weapons...so of course they have caches of weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. this sickening regime we have must be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. "Date stamps" I wonder which format these stamps are in.
If they are in the US format the weapons are planted.

If they are in the European format, these yahoos are probably misreading them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Not this time, assholes. Not again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Planted?
They don't even have to plant it- they can just say it's there, and that it's "top secret" and no photos can be provided.

I'm rather surprised they haven't done that with a nuke they "found being smuggled in to Syria"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. My, my weapons in Iraq, what a threat to the peace there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Cheney wants any excuse to attack Iran on May 5th - The bullshit will just keep coming now daily!
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 02:18 PM by GreenTea
Warring shots fired today at Iranian boat - Are we suppose to believe their lies after lies? When we know the greedy republican imperialist want those Iranian oil fields, and want another war for profit, before BushCo inc. leaves office!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. WHY WOULD ANYONE BELEIVE ANYTHING FROM THESE GUYS AT THIS POINT?!
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 02:17 PM by Phred42
Ignorance is bliss, willful ignorance is an opportunity! Double Secret Reich-wing motto

.....................







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Weapons Given to Iraq Are Missing
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 02:21 PM by Lasher
GAO Estimates 30% of Arms Are Unaccounted For

August 6, 2007

The Pentagon has lost track of about 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols given to Iraqi security forces in 2004 and 2005, according to a new government report, raising fears that some of those weapons have fallen into the hands of insurgents fighting U.S. forces in Iraq.

The author of the report from the Government Accountability Office says U.S. military officials do not know what happened to 30 percent of the weapons the United States distributed to Iraqi forces from 2004 through early this year as part of an effort to train and equip the troops. The highest previous estimate of unaccounted-for weapons was 14,000, in a report issued last year by the inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

<snip>

Stohl said insurgents frequently use small-arms fire to force military convoys to move in a particular direction -- often toward roadside bombs. She noted that the Bush administration frequently complains that Iran and Syria are supplying insurgents but has paid little attention to whether U.S. military errors inadvertently play a role. "We know there is seepage and very little is being done to address the problem," she said.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/05/AR2007080501299.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
30.  Bush, military feeding Bullshit stories......
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 02:42 PM by GreenTea
As usual, Bush/Cheney, Department of Defense, Pentagon, Corporate Military Industrial Complex war for profit republicans and media, itching to invade another sovereign nation using the same lies they used about Iraq!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. Shiite extremists, Iran-blame it on everyone else, they just want us out of their fucking country!
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 02:40 PM by LaPera
Can you blame them? would you like your country's resource OIL ripped-off and a foreign army creating havoc in your streets, saying it's for your own good and shoving it down their throats!

But BushCo wants that regions oil...so the lies just keep on coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
32. I don't believe this story, and I think most Americans won't either.
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spirit of 67 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
44. I don't believe it either. Although at this point I no longer have faith in the
people of the USA to figure out this b.s. Remember, these are still the same people in voted in Bush 43 for a second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. What stupid horseshit
That's about as good as when they found one of the 9/11 hijackers' photo ID on the sidewalk outside the WTC. Who do they think they are kidding. Gannon/Guckert needs to go back to the White House and do the hosing'. They should quit trying to hose the public. We are the recipients of a major Psyops campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
34. Tricks are for kids. The imbeciles already tried this stupid trick.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
35. And a return address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. SO WHAT?
who cares where their weapons come from?

US weapons are everywhere and that doesn't seem to be newsworthy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
39. Britons kidnapped in Iraq are ‘held by Iran’
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 08:41 AM by ohio2007
Five British hostages who were kidnapped in Iraq almost a year ago are being held inside Iran by Revolutionary Guards, according to two separate sources in the Middle East and London.

The hostages were handed over to the Revolutionary Guards by their Iraqi kidnappers last November, the sources believe. One of the sources said they were being held in the western Iranian city of Hamadan.

If confirmed, the involvement of Revolutionary Guards would be seen as evidence that senior figures in the Iranian government had backed the decision to hold them in the country.

However, British officials said that while there had been rumours that the five were in Iran, they had seen no evidence to support the idea.

snip

According to one of the sources, they are under the control of Mohammad Safaei, 41, a senior Revolutionary Guard colonel who was previously in charge of special operations in the southern Iraqi city of Basra.

The hostages were kidnapped in Baghdad last May in an attempt to force the Americans to release Qais al-Khazaali, an Iraqi militia leader said to be close to the Revolutionary Guards.

Khazaali was apparently being groomed by Iran to take control of a breakaway faction of the Mahdi Army, a Shi’ite militia, that would be compliant with Tehran.


snip
The five were abducted from the Iraqi finance ministry, where one of them, Peter Moore, a computer specialist, was teaching data-processing. The other four were his bodyguards.

The suggestion that the hostages are in Hamadan follows contradictory claims earlier this month that they were in Tehran. This is the first time it has been claimed they are in the hands of Revolutionary Guards. One of the sources has previously proved to be a reliable source of information about them.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article3822830.ece

Wonder if one of "the students" learning data processing was an exchange student from Iran ? ANyway;

"Khazaali was apparently being groomed by Iran to take control of a breakaway faction of the Mahdi Army, a Shi’ite militia, that would be compliant with Tehran."

if al Sadr states "all Madhi army is to stop attacks on Iraqi army,police,government and civilians, is it safe to say that if attacks continue, al Sadr is saying those fighters are not under his command?

Who would they lock step with? a lieing al Sadr? or ?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
40. How unoriginal. The warmongerers told us this fairytale a couple of years ago. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
41. What? No photos? The last time we had photos, the weapons had English stencil letters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
42. Building the case for attacking Iran.
And guess what? It will work on the "stuck on stupid" (I love that phrase by J. Wright) folks. They will buy it and they far outnumber thinking people. <"stuck on stupid" = sos folks> When you see "SOS folks" in my threads you will know what it means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
45. If it is true, those Iranians have a lot of gall messing with our illegal invasion...
of their neighbors on both sides. Why we outta just illegally invade them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC