Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama keeps cool as Democratic fears heat up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:12 PM
Original message
Obama keeps cool as Democratic fears heat up
Source: Yahoo News / AFP

NEW YORK (AFP) - White House hopeful Barack Obama professes no anxiety about polls that show his longstanding lead evaporating, but senior Democrats are rattled at the Republicans' Sarah Palin-inspired charge.

Since his shock decision a fortnight ago to select the little-known Alaska governor as his running mate, John McCain has risen steadily in opinion surveys on the back of a re-energized conservative base.

Obama, however, appears confident that the Palin surge will fade as her novelty value wears off, as the media digs deeper into her record, and as voters reappraise which ticket would best bring change to a fretful nation.

"I don't spend a lot of time looking at polls because a year ago today, I was down 20," he said Wednesday in Norfolk, Virginia, referring to his long-odds bid to wrest the Democratic nomination from Hillary Clinton.

"So if I spent my time worrying about polls, I'd be in big trouble. Right now it is neck and neck and you know what, that's probably how it was going to be inevitably," the Democrat added.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080911/pl_afp/usvoteobamapoll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. what fears from Democrats? He's going to win this...
we're not fearful. Right??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. DUers could learn a lot about the Meaning of Cool from this man...
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm no longer comfortable with cool while the house burns down nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. being cool during a house fire can save your life
losing your cool could cause you to go up in flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We already tried being cool in a house fire in 2000 and 2004.
Twice we heard that by being cool and not being vicious back, we'd win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Don't you ever get tired of whining? And please stop comparing Obama to Kerry.
It gets tired. He's nothing like Kerry.

And for the Democrats who are complaining, what are they doing? Are they out there supporting Obama? Are they out there being good surrogates? Look at the Republicans. The Republicans are everywhere helping McSame. Where are the Democrats.

Unless you are doing something, please stop whining and complaining.

If you have no faith in Obama and his abilities, then why are you even here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ok fine. I'll shut up and observe nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Obama also has the benefit of Kerry's experience.
In hindsight, Kerry has knowledge of what went wrong and what went right, and all of this knowledge and experience is in now in Obama's hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Here here!
I totally agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. 
[link:www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules.html|Click
here] to review the message board rules.
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. After watching him on O'Reilly....
I am a little nervous. He is not adept in the art of the soundbyte.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Going on O'Reilly must have been a desperation move.
I really can't see any other reason for doing so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protect our future Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. It was a brilliant move. Not desperation at all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Not desperation....
but I did not think it made him look good. The soundbytes he DID provide on the surge, taxes, and Afghanistan didn't seem to help :(.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. This nation isn't 'fretful', it's on the edge of a cliff.
And in dire straits, and needs the smartest people possible to help fix it. Not some unqualified brain-dead dominionist quack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I Know That, You Know That, Every Thinking Voter Knows That
Will that be enough? :scared:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Did he say "I'm known as a good closer?" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obiwan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. Once again, here is how it works:
1. Pollsters pick one Dem, one Rethug, and one independent for their polling. Everyone knows that there are at least 11 million more registered Democrats than there are Rethugs. On numbers alone, if the Dems turn out and there is no voting machine hanky panky, the Dems should win in a landslide. 2. Pollsters only poll people with LAND LINES. This sampling skews more elderly (who tend to be conservative) and more toward less educated people. 3. A sizable slice of the new Democratic voters use CELL PHONES as their primary number. Pollsters do not poll cell phones, so the numbers are skewed. Not too worried about the election, although the GOP ads pander to the lowest common denominator and piss me off royally because they are so offensive and patently FALSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protect our future Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Also, new voters are not in the data base that the pollsters use,
so they never get polled even if they have a land line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoName Left Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Add into the equation Caller ID...
Many people have Caller ID on their land lines and ignore unfamiliar numbers.

Supposedly, polling outfits "adjust" for this...ALONG with inability to poll cell users...AND lack of access to names of newly registered voters. HOW can these multiple, unknowable, factors be adjusted with any reliability?

"Trust us, we know what we're doing - it's all scientific" from polling companies? I don't believe it. PLUS, this week it was revealed that some of the well-known pollsters had skewed additional Republican responders into their most recent snap-shot results.

This all adds up to meaningless pontificating from pollsters, based on often biased data, who have compromised their credibility. In contrast, the Obama campaign has thousands of ears to the real-world ground - 24/7.

I trust Obama's judgment. I trust the judgment of those he has chosen to put in charge of his campaign. I trust the cool leadership that has prevailed time after time. We're so accustomed to the nuts setting fire to the asylum; it's a major mind shift to realize that sanity has arrived on the scene.

In addition, don't believe for one second that Obama/Biden have no plans to deal with election fraud, rigged machines and ballot tampering. If you and I are worried about it? We can be sure they started laying groundwork months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RantinRavin Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Actually, that is not entirely correct.
According to Rasmussen:

Like all polling firms, Rasmussen Reports weights its data to reflect the population at large. Among other targets, Rasmussen Reports weights data by political party affiliation using a dynamic weighting process. Our baseline targets are established based upon survey interviews with a sample of adults nationwide completed during the preceding three months (a total of 45,000 interviews). For September, the targets are 39.7% Democrat, 32.1% Republican, and 28.2% unaffiliated (see party trends and analysis). For the month of August, the targets were 40.6% Democrat, 31.6% Republican, and 27.8% unaffiliated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. Obama has already defeated a much more formidable foe than McCain/Palin.
I'm not worried in the least about this convention bounce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC