|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
AlphaCentauri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 09:57 AM Original message |
US House set to vote on nuclear deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
1. H R 7061 on the US-India civilian nuclear agreement. Call and say VOTE NO! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Why vote no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Nothing against the Indian people. But this is pure insanity. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Pure insanity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. For one thing, it violates international treaties. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShockediSay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. And clearly benefits the lobbying US nuclear contractors {like GE} |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. It's lucrative enough that someone appears to be paying people to spam blogs in favor of it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShockediSay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. I've noticed a couple of troll-like postings here lately nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 10:50 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. It doesn't violate a single treaty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. India is more interested in bombs than electricity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. India cannot sign the NPT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. This cannot accelerate the arms race between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-27-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. India buys Russian aircraft carrier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phred42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. INSANE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightVictor (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. I'm OK with this deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlphaCentauri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Democracy at work: US-India Business Council aggressively lobbies for N-deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightVictor (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I prefer US companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlphaCentauri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Where money is present there is a chance of corruption, I prefer a international treaty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightVictor (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I don't disagree with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. The deal extremely limits IAEA oversight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightVictor (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. The IAEA Directior has endorsed this deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merwin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Funny, I thought that we were already pretty close with them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indio55555 (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-26-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'm fine with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC