Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force: Nuke missile silo fire went undetected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:10 PM
Original message
Air Force: Nuke missile silo fire went undetected
Source: Associated Press

DENVER – A fire caused $1 million worth of damage at an unmanned underground nuclear launch site last spring, but the Air Force didn't find out about it until five days later, an Air Force official said Thursday.

The May 23 fire burned itself out after an hour or two, and multiple safety systems prevented any threat of an accidental launch of the Minuteman III missile, Maj. Laurie Arellano said. She said she was not allowed to say whether the missile was armed with a nuclear warhead at the time of the fire.

Arellano said the Air Force didn't know a fire had occurred until May 28, when a repair crew went to the launch site — about 40 miles east of Cheyenne, Wyo., and 100 miles northeast of Denver — because a trouble signal indicated a wiring problem.

She said the flames never entered the launch tube where the missile stood and there was no danger of a radiation release.

The fire, blamed on a faulty battery charger, burned a box of shotgun shells, a shotgun and a shotgun case that were kept in the room, Arellano said. A shotgun is a standard security weapon at missile silos.

Arellano said the battery chargers at all U.S. missile launch site have been replaced.

She said the incident wasn't reported sooner because of the complexity of the investigation.
...
Cheyenne Mayor Jack Spiker, who said he learned of the incident when contacted by a reporter Thursday, said the fire doesn't undermine his confidence in the safety of the missile operations.

"It's rare that they have an accident, and the accidents have never really, that I know of, amounted to much because of the safety devices that are built into the system," he said.

The revelation was the latest in a string of embarrassing missteps involving the nation's nuclear arsenal. In 2006, four electrical fuses for ballistic missile warheads were mistakenly shipped to Taiwan, and in 2007, a B-52 bomber was mistakenly armed with six nuclear-tipped missiles when it flew between Air Force bases in North Dakota and Louisiana.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081030/ap_on_re_us/missile_silo_fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm
I find that hard to believe

I was based at Minot AFB, also a SAC missile base
and they knew if anything was amiss on those sites, they would have us (SP) out there asap,
and the repair team on their way.......

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But SAC is gone - and apparently so are the very high
standards they demanded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Saw an article in a local publication
that said the AF was standing up an organization similiar to the old SAC command to take control of the Bombers and the Missiles. The fighter jockies that run the AF really dont want to waste time or money on strategic assets, they want to go faster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Interesting. I'll have to ask my dad about that -
he was career AF; spent 26 of his 32 years in SAC - has fascinating stories to tell about the days when LeMay was in charge and he still believes the "the impossible just takes a day longer" to accomplish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I find that very distressing an unmanned post with a nuke....
what about the terrorists. Its like an open invitation when security is so bad they don't know the place burned up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I agree..anything nuclear related shouldn't be unmanned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Were paying the Russians to get rid of nukes and we leave ours unattended...
WTF is wrong with that picture.????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Seriously I think this Administration has done this on purpose
there can be no other explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Because that's the REAL Bush Doctrine-
"Do As I Say, Not As I Do".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. similar to explosives stolen (enough to bring down highrise)
from army depot. Military couldn't even speculate when they were taken a month ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems4me Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. bump. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC