Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(New Hampshire Supreme) Court rejects GOP voter list claim against Dems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:16 PM
Original message
(New Hampshire Supreme) Court rejects GOP voter list claim against Dems
Source: Concord Monitor

Justices find no cause to protest sale of data

The Supreme Court yesterday unanimously dismissed an attempt by the New Hampshire Republican Party to force Democrats to reimburse the state for money made from selling voter data. The GOP, the court ruled, suffered no harm and "lacks standing" to bring the case.

"So far as we can discern, the (Republican Party) argues that it has suffered injury because the (Democrats) made money by selling the lists and it did not, thereby placing it at a disadvantage," Justice Richard Galway wrote in a decision signed onto by the four other judges. He added: "Even presuming the (Democratic Party) was unjustly enriched, it was not at the expense of the (Republicans)."

The Republican Party appeal didn't have much in common with the original case, Libertarian Party vs. Secretary of State. That case successfully challenged a state law that allowed only the two major parties to purchase a detailed voter file from the state, with data including name, party registration history and age, for about $500. Previously, such data could only be collected on a town-by-town basis.
...
Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley painted Republicans as the ones who were wasting taxpayer money.

"Not only did the Supreme Court rule that the GOP did not suffer any legal harm or disadvantage, but they also concluded that the Republican Party had no standing to bring the complaint forward," Buckley said in a statement. "This is yet another example of the New Hampshire Republican Party clogging the court system with frivolous and baseless complaints. While many New Hampshire residents continue to struggle in the current economic climate, the Republican Party has wasted taxpayer dollars on a non-issue."

Read more: http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081220/NEWS01/812200309
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't the NH GOP the same one that was connected to that phone line jamming scandal in 2002?
They just keep showing how obnoxious they are, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yuppers, the same pathetic corrupt republicon homelanders
as usual, the republicons are busy working against the interests of honesty, decency, and America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. What a silly lawsuit
Edited on Mon Dec-22-08 07:48 AM by MaineDem
It's not just the state data that the Dems have. There's a lot of added data that the state party (and the DNC) worked hard to gather. The GOP doesn't update their data like we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. So will this be . . .
So will this be another of the dread faces of lawsuit abuse the national Chamber of Commerce is running all over the country? I'm guessing the answer will be "not bloody likely." Nor will we see Al Franken, victim of an attempted SLAPP lawsuit by Bill O'Reilly. I wonder why the Chamber of Commerce doesn't mention those "wholly without merit" lawsuits?

Now why would that be? Think, think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. that must have cost the rep's some money in lawyer time
they could have spent it on nice presents. oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC