Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anger in Pakistan at US plan to expand drone attacks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:43 PM
Original message
Anger in Pakistan at US plan to expand drone attacks
Source: Guardian UK

Anger in Pakistan at US plan to expand drone attacks
• Pentagon urges Obama to widen reach of strikes
• Islamabad warns of public backlash against move

Saeed Shah in Islamabad and Ewen MacAskill in Washington
The Guardian, Thursday 19 March 2009
Article history


Pakistan reacted with anger yesterday to an American proposal to expand its drone missile strikes inside the country against Taliban and al-Qaida targets.

Pakistani politicians and officials described the idea of extending military operations into the vast, south-west province of Baluchistan as provocative and counterproductive, and warned of a severe backlash if the US went ahead.

Sources in the US administration confirmed that the White House has received recommendations from the military about an escalation in the use of the CIA's unmanned drones to launch missile attacks. At present, attacks are confined to the tribal areas in the north-west of the country.

The recommendation calls for a renewed focus on targets in the economically backward province which has provided a stronghold for the Afghan Taliban and a sanctuary for al-Qaida elements. A source cautioned that Obama has not made a decision and could decide any military gains from expansion into Baluchistan may be outweighed by the public backlash, putting at risk the Pakistan government.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/19/pakistan-us-national-security
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. pakistan is less a country than afghanistan today. we are not engaged with
any sovereign governments, and we need to let our military do and go wherever they need to be to fight al quaida. sooner rather than later, we will inherit pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. they're called war crimes, and we need to stop them
sooner rather than later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. USA,- messing around in other people's nations, sooner or later someone is gonna strike back
.
.
.

Pakistan has got nukes - probably none that can hit the USA mainland,

but they can sure as hell hit some of the USA bases nearby

Is the USA bent on creating a global nuclear war?

Frigadee, I was hoping for better from Obama

I'm waiting, but I'm not really too hopeful

I think the USA is still bent on it's global domination thing

And that's a lose-lose for everyone IMO

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Critical reading skills required...
How does "Sources in the US administration confirmed that the White House has received recommendations from the military about an escalation in the use of the CIA's unmanned drones to launch missile attacks."

lead to "US Plan to Expand"????


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcindian Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It is probably more then that since also written in the article is.
"Islamabad warns of public backlash against move"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. That makes no sense. In fact it is close to being a non sequitor. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC