Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA 'no longer' using secret prisons: director

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 01:01 PM
Original message
CIA 'no longer' using secret prisons: director
Source: AFP

The CIA is "no longer" operating secret prisons used by the intelligence agency to interrogate terror suspects, and plans to shut all remaining "black sites," the spy agency's director said Thursday.

The statement by the Central Intelligence Agency chief confirmed the spy service was carrying out an order from President Barack Obama to shut down the secret prisons that have been condemned at home and abroad as a flagrant violation of human rights.

"CIA no longer operates detention facilities or black sites and has proposed a plan to decommission the remaining sites," CIA director Leon Panetta said in a letter sent to agency employees.

"I have directed our agency personnel to take charge of the decommissioning process and have further directed that the contracts for site security be promptly terminated," he said.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090409/wl_afp/usattacksintelligence_20090409174632
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. A crock of BULLSHIT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Obama's pro-Bush policies are hurting his polls, so this "phoney" story might help.
Crock of shit is right!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. The proof is in the quote:
"CIA no longer operates detention facilities or black sites and has proposed a plan to decommission the remaining sites,"

Which is it? We no longer operate them, or we have a plan to stop?

:grr:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. guess we just have to take their word for it.
Of course, that is also what they said when they WERE using the prisons.

Disband the fucker. We don't need the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yea, why would a modern country need an intelligence agency
Thats just totally pro-corporate fascism MAN.

CIA needs some work/reform, but it spawned to perform a necessary task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We have over a dozen intelligence agencies working in this country who can pick up any slack fine.
The CIA has outlived its use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Members of the Intelligence Community (IC)
Director of National Intelligence
Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence
Air Force Intelligence
Army Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Coast Guard Intelligence
Defense Intelligence Agency
Department of Energy
Department of Homeland Security
Department of State
Department of the Treasury
Drug Enforcement Administration
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Marine Corps Intelligence
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
National Reconnaissance Office
National Security Agency
Navy Intelligence


intelligence.gov

And yet, they all got the intel "wrong" on 9/11?...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not to mention the cooperation of friendly foreign agencies
MI5, MI6 (Britain)
Mossad (Israel)
DST (France)
Bundesnachrichtendienst BND (Germany)
CSIS (Canada)

and innumerable others...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. And the long list of intelligence agencies which warned us of 9/11 . . .!!!
Russia was so concerned about Bush's Operation Ignore that they went to

the United Nations Security Council with their information . . .

In August of 2001, the United Nations sent its representatives to warn

Bush and our intelligence agencies of the information Russia had been

supply which included specifics --

We now know the administration had been advised of the day the attacks

would occur!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Don't forget the OSP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Which one of those is responsible for foreign intel?
humint? sigint? The FBI is a domestic agency. Most of those agencies listed above have more janitors than intelligence staff. The CIA was created to be a civilian intelligence agency, separate of the military (which just so happen to be the only agencies on your list with any capability).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Puh-LEEZ!
The problem wasn't the intelligence. Remember, the PDB of 8/6/2001 was titled, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike Within U.S."

The problem was the consumer--Bush. It would have taken just too much work for him to have one of his staff call the airlines and tell them, "be on your guard; if overly-nervous people bearing one-way plane tickets paid for in cash, and who have no luggage, attempt to check in for a flight, please have your airport's police force detain them for questioning."

Liberals have no problem with this kind of profiling, as it is just standard police work. Then again, the only reason Bush cared about liberals' opinion of anything he did is so he would be sure to do things they didn't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. the other intelligence agencies..
will do the same thing..Rummie took away some of the intelligence activities from the CIA, and put it under the Pentagon's control..along with the budget..which is 'classified'. Too bad we still teach torture at the School of the America's or whatever it is called these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Often, CIA money has been in school budgets . . . !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. And what task was that?
Did it EVER do anything right?

It overthrew democratically elected governments. It supported dictatorial governments. It assassinated, and attempted to assassinate, foreign leaders. It poisoned our relationships with Iran, Cuba, Central America as a whole, most of the middle east. It did NOT give us prior intelligence on the Soviet incursion into Poland in '54, Hungary in '56, Czechoslovakia in '68, Afghanistan in '79. It almost single-handedly created the cocaine traffic from Colombia and Bolivia to support its illicit wars in Central America.

Name ONE CIA success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Well, it did manage to smuggle an impressive amount of cocaine into this country
Wikipedia

But you were probably referring to "good things"

CIA = "Cocaine Into America"

Oh, the CIA did mange to find Osama--

CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July: French report claims terrorist leader stayed in Dubai hospital

...but that was before it became more advantageous for BushCo to not find OBL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. well gosh..looks like it did everything right!
how are American business interests to be protected, so they can grow into behemoth multi-national corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Sorry, not going to defend my profession
against someone whose knowledge of it can be boiled down to one sy hersh article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. It's not the profession I have a problem with - it is the agency, which
has been a tool for American imperialism since its inception. It is NOT an intelligence agency - it is a black operations agency, less interested in gathering valuable intelligence than imposing a sick ideology upon the world. While other agencies have sometimes lost their way, and their mission, the CIA has ALWAYS been the creation of the Dulles vision of US hegemony. It has always acted against genuine democratic movements, and supported fascist and dictatorial movements.

Oh, and you don't know me - you know nothing of my background, or my knowledge of US intelligence agencies. Your snide bullshit about 'one Sy Hersh article' is as meaningless as your claim to that profession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I made an observation, you're making an assumption
My position is slightly more tenable I think.

The CIA has been the main apparatus for projecting political power in the world, most of the examples you listed above were signed off on by presidents. Claiming the CIA is not an intelligence agency is the most absurd argument yet, even today with the massive expansion of the NCS...clandestine ops are still far less staffed than the intelligence side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Bullshit. You set up a strawman, and then attacked my intelligence.
Edited on Sat Apr-11-09 11:50 AM by RaleighNCDUer
You start out saying you will not try to defend 'your profession' - which nobody was attacking - the CIA is not a profession, it is an organization, and it is the rogue organization that I have problems with.

It may have been chartered as, as its name says, an agency that is the central gatherer and analist of foreign intelligence, but the CIA has been a rogue operation since its inception, as I mentioned above.

You say "The CIA has been the main apparatus for projecting political power in the world". That is NOT its charter. That's the state department's job. The CIA was NOT created to overthrow governments, assassinate foreign opposition (as well as local opposition) and be the black-ops thugs for right wing administrations. There is not a SINGLE job being done by the CIA that is not being duplicated by a half dozen other agencies - and THAT is what the CIA was created to do, to bring all intelligence operations under one roof so we would know what the fuck we are doing. They have not done that from the beginning. Ever since the CIA was overthrowing the president of Iran to put a friendly fascist in power we had to rely on DIA and NSA for REAL intelligence.

The supposedly small roll of 'clandestine ops' is smokescreen - if the CIA truly believes that is roll is "main apparatus for projecting political power in the world", then entire CIA is a clandestine op which should be disbanded immediately and a significant number of its people put in jail.

Or are you now going to defend the CIA secret prisons?

http://aljazeera.com/news/articles/42/Somalia_Another_CIAbacked_coup_blows_up.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. Correct . . .
but, unfortunately, I'm sure they count those decades of violence as their "successes" --

and, of course, what they practiced and accomplished in other nations they brought home

to America ---

Will anyone in power ever confirm our decades of political violence which continues even

today?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
37. Even Truman spoke of his regret for creating this American "Gestapo" . . .
In fact, Allen Dulles' Nazis - brought in via Project Paperclip were used

to found the CIA . . . and were also funneled into the FBI.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. I'm missing your argument
We shouldn't have intelligence agencies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Make a copy of this story, and when someone blows the whistle in a year or two...
about renditions and black sites continuing, this will be important to have.

Not that Congress is going to do anything, of course, then, now, or in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whew! That's a relief.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pardon me while I scoff openly
If they think we still need warrantless wiretapping, you can bet they still need the other side of the equation- secret prisons and torture.

I'm rec'ing so everyone sees that they claimed this when it's proven otherwise later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. ....
The headline: CIA 'no longer' using secret prisons


Opening sentence: The CIA is "no longer" operating secret prisons used by the intelligence agency to interrogate terror suspects

So, uh...who is operating them?


"and plans to shut all remaining "black sites"

Except the ones being operated by others now?




The quote: "CIA no longer operates detention facilities or black sites and has proposed a plan to decommission the remaining sites,"

Still...no longer operating and the "remaining sites" are? What exactly?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It's all about the fine print these days, ain't it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Most likley contracted out to Blackwater or whatever they call themselves now.
Probably a bunch of different companies that are running the secret prisons now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. "XE' is their current title, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. I believe everything the Cocaine Import Agency director tells me.
Edited on Thu Apr-09-09 02:41 PM by rcrush
USA USA USA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. roflmao!!.....Thats a good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. HUH?
How can you 'decommission' the 'remaining' sites if they don't operate them anymore?

<snip>
"CIA no longer operates detention facilities or black sites and has proposed a plan to decommission the remaining sites,"...
<snip>

What am I missing?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Blackwater?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. It's the difference between having but not using them, and neither having nor using them
Edited on Thu Apr-09-09 08:09 PM by Posteritatis
If I had, let's say, an airbase out in Lower Obscuristan that was doing airbase things, I'd be operating it and it would be in commission.

If I decided to no longer do airbase things, but was still paying the lease or mowing the lawn or whatever, I wouldn't be operating it, but it would still be in commission - if I needed to do airbase things later, I would still have the option.

If I decided to no longer do airbase things and gave the place back to the Lower Obscuristani government in Hypothetibad, I'd no longer be operating it and I'd have decommissioned it - if I wanted to do airbase things again, I'd need to find a new airbase. It would, at least in theory, eliminate the option of starting operations up again there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. I BELIEVE them, dammit~!
:rofl: NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
32. there should be
an independent agency that can go around and check this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
33. And since when does the CIA carry out President's orders ....
Edited on Thu Apr-09-09 09:31 PM by defendandprotect
... unless they're for war, torture, or wiretapping?

Where we'll really be in trouble is if Pres. Obama believes this--- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
40. I believe in the Easter Bunny, Santa and Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
44. zOMG Obama = BUSH!111!111!11
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
45. oh that's so reassuring nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC