Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dow to sue over Quebec pesticide ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:48 PM
Original message
Dow to sue over Quebec pesticide ban
Source: Globe and Mail

Claiming 'no scientific basis' for residential ban, U.S. company demands $2-million (U.S.) in damages under NAFTA's Chapter 11

Dow AgroSciences LLC has decided to sue the federal government over Quebec's ban on the residential use of pesticides.

The U.S.-based company, maker of the herbicide 2,4-D, is claiming $2-million (U.S.) in damages, using controversial provisions in the North American Free Trade Agreement that allow businesses to sue governments over regulations that harm their interests.

The case has attracted wide interest because so-called cosmetic pesticide bans are becoming increasingly popular, with Ontario recently following Quebec's lead in introducing one and many retailers removing chemical bug and weed killers from their shelves.

Some environmental groups have been pointing to the possibility that Dow would launch its legal action as a reason for renegotiating the Chapter 11 provisions in NAFTA that allow investors to seek compensation over government regulations.


Read more: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090409.wdow0409/BNStory/National/home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. All together now, "And Dow lets you do great things."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh yes, the infamous Chapter 11...
where a Province/State or city cannot protect their citizens against the multinationals without being sued thanks to NAFTA. Chapter 11 is a big reason NAFTA needs to be re-written, not the only reason but one big one, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. "You'll eat and breathe our toxic crap, you'll pay for it, and you'll like it." - Dow
The republicon homelander totalitarian mindset in Full Frontal Nudity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "Hear, hear!" - Monsanto. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. well this is where the evil of NAFTA shows up
its telling Canadians what to do and what they can't do

Quebec is going to get pretty ticked off over this
we may see the end of Nafta coming and I welcome it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Without Chemicals, Life Would Be Impossible" (R)
This was a marketing slogan used by DOW a few years ago. Unfortunately, the fact of the matter is that Without Life, Chemicals would be Impossible.

I commend Canada on taking the first step in ending the support of the Military Chemical complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. ROFLMAO!!! These corporations have alot of balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. replace Balls with lawyers and you are spot on. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. up next: "province N sued because sales not as high as they could be" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC