Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leahy Invites Bybee To Testify Before Senate Judiciary Committee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 12:58 PM
Original message
Leahy Invites Bybee To Testify Before Senate Judiciary Committee
Source: Senator Leahy

WASHINGTON (Wednesday, April 29, 2009) – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) today sent a letter to Judge Jay S. Bybee inviting him to testify before the Committee in connection with his role in writing legal memoranda authorizing the use of harsh interrogation techniques while serving as the Assistant Attorney General of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). Bybee was the head of OLC from October 2001 until March 2003, when he was confirmed to a lifetime appointment on the federal bench.

Publicly released memoranda signed by Bybee in 2002 reveal the legal authorizations for harsh interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, a technique widely defined as torture. In 2003, during confirmation proceedings for a lifetime appointment to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Bybee refused to answer questions about his work at OLC. In the summer of 2004, more than a year after Bybee was confirmed to the bench, the first “torture memo” signed by Bybee on August 1, 2002, became public. The memo interpreted the federal anti-torture statute only to prohibit causing pain equivalent to “the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death.”

One recent press account cites Bybee associates claiming that he “was not pleased” with the outcome of the OLC memoranda. However, The New York Times today reports that Bybee “believed at the time, and continues to believe today, that the conclusions were legally correct.”

“By coming forward and testifying before the Committee, you will have the opportunity to amplify or correct these accounts, and explain your role and your views,” Leahy wrote.

Read more: http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200904/042909b.html



full letter here: http://judiciary.senate.gov/resources/documents/111thCongress/upload/042909LeahyToBybee.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. And what happens when he says, NO?
Leahy may be sincere, but he ain't got no teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Invite? Come on Leahy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, you said it first, before I got to the keyboards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. yeah, and he'll show up right after Rove does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Or maybe together. Hand in hand.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. and skipping, holding daisies!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Inviting him??????? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Time for subpoenas, not invitations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Isn't the Ninth Circuit generally liberal? No wonder W appointed Bybee to it.
Isn't that the court that just agreed with the ACLU on states secrets claims? If so, I wonder (but not too much) how old Jay voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC