Former U.S. weapons inspector says Bush may have picked, chosen facts in justifying war
Former U.S. weapons inspector David Kay said Wednesday that President Bush may have been selective about the facts he used to make the case for going to war with Iraq.
That's not necessarily to say, though, that intelligence about Iraqi weapons was misused by the Bush White House, Kay told an audience at Trinity University.
Kay said any American president in office during the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks would have been deeply concerned about Saddam Hussein, and would have sought to make the most persuasive appeal that he could to the nation.
"Politicians don't go around picking their weakest arguments," Kay said. "The real charge that deserves careful scrutiny is not whether you picked the best argument out, but whether you actually manipulated and were dishonest about the data."
He added that he's seen no evidence that the Bush administration mischaracterized intelligence from Iraq, "but it is such a serious charge that it deserves investigation."
more…
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/02/25/national2357EST0908.DTL