Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Excise tax on high-cost health plans would have nonunion impact, study shows

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 03:25 AM
Original message
Excise tax on high-cost health plans would have nonunion impact, study shows
Source: Alec MacGillis, The Washington Post

A proposed tax on high-cost health insurance plans, an element of Democratic health-care legislation that has been strongly opposed by organized labor, would actually fall equally on nonunion plans, according to a new analysis.

The controversial tax has been widely viewed as a labor issue, but at least 80 percent of the workers whose plans would be subject to the tax in 2019 would be in nonunion jobs, according to the analysis by Ken Jacobs of the University of California at Berkeley Labor Center and William H. Dow, professor of health economics at Berkeley and a member of President George W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisers.

This impact is roughly in line with the overall breakdown of nonunion and union workers with employer-provided plans. And it would be true both under the version of the tax passed by the Senate and a more labor-friendly one the White House agreed to last month.

The excise tax on so-called Cadillac health plans has emerged as one of the most contentious elements of the proposal that congressional Democrats are cobbling together from bills that passed the House and Senate.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/17/AR2010021705126.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does it fall heavier on high cost of living areas and employers who have older employees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Probably, but hard to tell for sure
All I've found so far is that they want to tax plans that cost over $23,000 per year for families, or $8500 per year for individuals. That seems like a fairly high threshold, so it would seem logical that most union jobs wouldn't be affected. The tax would be 40% of the difference between the cost of the plan and either $23,000 or $8500.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They are speaking of tweeking the thresholds up in the fix
Whether union or non-union, an alternate way of looking at this is that the people with these plans and their employers currently have and have had for years a really nice tax break worth thousands more than the average tax payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC