Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats: Quintuple oil companies' taxes for spill fund

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ed Barrow Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:50 PM
Original message
Democrats: Quintuple oil companies' taxes for spill fund
Source: Associated Press

Senate Democrats today proposed quintupling the tax that oil companies pay into a spill liability fund as they seek to pare back a House-passed tax hike on investment fund managers.

The tax changes are being made as the Senate again takes up legislation extending unemployment benefits and a variety of expired tax breaks enjoyed by both individuals and businesses. The measure would add about $80 billion to the deficit over the upcoming decade, the Congressional Budget Office said.

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., also proposed restoring $24 billion in aid to cash-strapped states to help them pay for their Medicaid budgets next year. Deficit concerns prompted House leaders to scrap a companion plan last month, generating criticism from governors and labor unions, who say that without the funding, states would have to lay off workers and make other painful budget cuts to make up for the budget shortfall.

The legislation unveiled Tuesday would raise the tax on oil produced offshore from 8 cents to 41 cents per barrel. That's nine cents higher than legislation that passed the House last month. The move to increase the tax would raise $15 billion over the coming decade as Congress seeks to shore up the fund in the wake of the catastrophic spill in the Gulf of Mexico.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/deepwaterhorizon/7042612.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. the one downside I see is that it means taxing FUTURE income
what really needs to happen is garnish their windfall profits and seize their assets.
Taxing will take way too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC