Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fiorina changes stance on unemployment benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 10:59 PM
Original message
Fiorina changes stance on unemployment benefits
Source: Mercury News

SACRAMENTO, Calif.—Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina on Tuesday shifted her position on extending unemployment benefits, saying she would "probably" support the extension if she were in the Senate.
In an interview with San Francisco's KGO-AM radio, Fiorina said she would probably break with members of her party.

Senate Democrats on Tuesday were helped by a newly sworn senator and broke through a GOP filibuster in Washington, D.C., in their effort to extend jobless benefits to 2.5 million Americans. The effort initially failed last month.

"I probably would vote for this extension, but I'll tell you what, I think it is absolutely appropriate for people to stand on their desks and say, 'When is it that we're finally going to do what needs to be done and cut government spending?'" Fiorina said.

Earlier this month, the former Hewlett Packard chief executive said she opposed the extension because it would worsen the national deficit. Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer had been using Fiorina's position to attack her as out of touch with average workers.

"For so many weeks, more than 200,000 Californians have been waiting desperately for this bill to help them through these tough times, and for weeks, Carly Fiorina has said no to these California families," said Boxer's campaign manager, Rose Kapolczynski.



Read more: http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_15560970?nclick_check=1



She's on the run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. she is still a repuke whore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. As a Senator (forbid) she will not.
She is just saying this to get votes. She is a liar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agree DL! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iliyah Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Wait
this morning I heard on MSNBC, Andrea???, anyways someone was telling her that the POLLS were definitely on the side of the GOP and the deficit, you know, our children's children will have to pay for the unemployment extension.

I thought at that moment, if there is a depression, I mean worldwide, doesn't the rich loose also? And, there won't be a deficit to pay off b/c everyone in the world will be broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Well the problem in that situation would be the collapse of the dollar
Our debt(bonds) would mean nothing and we would have a hell of a hard time getting out of debt and spending any future money on the deficit.

But I think we are FAR FAR away from that point. The deficit isn't great, but unemployment is far worst of a point.

As for the polls and GOP, Gallup has shown two straight polls that had the Dems leading the generic poll(although the 1st one was in the margin of error but the 2nd one had a clear 6 point lead). I think we could get unemployment to go down, the better ppl will start to feel about themselves which will help the incumbent party. If the economy is slowly growing and unemployment isn't dropping fast enough, then the Dems are in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. The polls are against the GOP

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/behind-the-numbers/2010/07/broad_support_for_jobless_benefits.html?wprss=behind-the-numbers

While the national public is closely divided as to whether the federal government should spend more money to try to boost the economy, more than six in 10 support extending jobless benefits to the long-term unemployed. Thirty-six percent say they oppose the idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. she's a republican and that's all they know
is to lie and lie and cheat and steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, she would, would she? That two yacht-having bimbo
will say anything now to get elected. Just like the desperate John "5-planes" McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. she has two yachts? How many houses? Does she know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FirstTimeVoterAt37 Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Oh crap, it's going to pass?"
"I better get started taking credit for it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Republicans oppose it then if the economy turns around in the next six months
They'll do 1 of 2 things
1. Take full credit for it
or
2. Tell us how the economy turned around in spite of it. That it was really all those tax breaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Flippy - Floppy!
Oh...Ms. Finkorina...you are going to get it from the TeaTalibanTraitorBaggers for saying that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. Still won't erase the fact she's #19 of the 20 Worst CEOs of ALL TIME
"A consummate self-promoter, Fiorina was busy pontificating on the lecture circuit and posing for magazine covers while her company floundered. She paid herself handsome bonuses and perks while laying off thousands of employees to cut costs. The merger Fiorina orchestrated with Compaq in 2002 was widely seen as a failure. She was ousted in 2005."

http://www.cnbc.com/id/30502091/Portfolio_s_Worst_American_CEOs_of_All_Time?slide=3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. and her HP computers didn't work, either: story
I bought a new HP desktop ca. 2004 at Best Buy 1 hr. from my home and it wouldn't power on. Had to drive it back. Took home another, thinking the first was a fluke---a brand new computer not powering on---it had never happened to me. Second HP computer powered on but had some other major problem (cannot remember what it was now). Basically, would not work. Took back the 2nd (by now, I'm spending lots on gas and time back and forth to Best Buy). Salesman asked if I wanted another HP and I said NOOOOOOOO!!!!!**&&$$$$!!!! I paid a bit more for a Sony, took it home and I'm still using it without a major problem.

I wouldn't vote for this woman, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Flip flopper! She has no principles at all.
She's an opportunist of the worst variety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Great to see GOPers forced to think about the unemployed even if only for a few months
in order to get elected. The nation's poor, unemployed and disabled better get all that they can before November, because they will be out in the cold again after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. That's not a shift, it's weasel words for
I want you to think I'll do the right thing and support the extension of benefits when I really know that I'll do no such thing.

The key is "probably", why can't she say definitively, "I will vote for continued extension of unemployment benefits during this time of employment crisis in the United States?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. I smell bullshit n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. "they should stand on their desks"????
Pretty non Senatorial behavior there - and not what I ever saw on CSPAN-2.

Now, in the case world of the RW - if Boxer said this, I would expect immediate coverage on Fox - with photoshopped pictures of Senator Boxer standing on her desk in the Senate floor, probably with a raised clenched fist - with serious faced FOX news anchors asking "if this was how CA wanted their Senator to act".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC